Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test: Validity and comparability

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 238-240

  Enderby, P ^a   Crow, E ^b  

^a FRENCHAY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Aphasia; Assessment; Screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; APHASIA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LANGUAGE; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SCREENING TEST; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

EID: 0029972998     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638289609166307     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. FAST. Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test. Windsor: NFER, 1986.
2. Powell GE, Bailey S, Clark E. A very short version of the Minnesota Aphasia Test. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1980; 19: 189-194.
3. Schuell H. The Minnesota Test for Differential Diagnosis of Aphasia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
4. Enderby P, Wood V, Wade D, Langton Hewer R. Aphasia after stroke: a detailed study of recovery in the first three months. International Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 1987; 8: 162-165.
5. Enderby P, Wood V, Wade D, Langton Hewer R. The Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test: a short simple test appropriate for non-specialists. International Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 1987; 8: 166-170.
6. Young A. Assessment for rehabilitation after stroke. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, 1988; 17: 267-273.
7. Thompson J, Enderby P. Is your Schuell really necessary? British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 1980; 14: 195-201.
8. Sarno MT. The Functional Communication Profile: manual of directions. Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine. Rehabilitation Monograph 42. New York.