Properties of fibres, endplates and acetylcholine receptors in the diaphragm, masseter, laryngeal, abdominal and limb muscles in the goat

Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 475-484

  Ibebunjo, Chikwendu ^a,c   Srikant, Coimbatore B ^a   Donati, François ^a,b  

^a ROYAL VICTORIA HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c Shriners Burns Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Muscle, skeletal: cricoarytenoideus dorsalis, thyroarytenoideus, diaphragm, masseter, soleus, gastrocnemius, transversus abdominis, rectus abdominis, morphology; Neuromuscular junction: acetylcholine receptor

Indexed keywords

CHOLINERGIC RECEPTOR;

ABDOMINAL WALL MUSCULATURE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAPHRAGM; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; GOAT; MUSCLE CELL; NERVE ENDING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

EID: 0029972991     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03018110     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Close RI. Dynamic properties of mammalian skeletal muscles. Physiol Rev 1972; 52: 129-97.
2. Robertson CH Jr, Pagel MA, Johnson RL Jr. The distribution of blood flow, oxygen consumption, and work output among the respiratory muscles during unobstructed hyperventilation. J Clin Invest 1977; 59: 43-50.
3. Ibebunjo C, Donati F. Sensitivities of different muscles to relaxant drugs. Baillière's Clinical Anaesthesiology 1994; 8: 369-94.
4. Paton WDM, Zaimis EJ. The action of d-tubocurarine and of decamethonium on respiratory and other muscles in the cat. J Physiol (Lond) 1951; 112: 311-31.
5. Churchill-Davidson HC, Richardson AT. Decamethonium iodide (C10): some observations on its action using electromyography. Proc Roy Soc Med 1952; 45: 179-86.
6. Maclagan J, Vrbova G. The importance of peripheral changes in determining the sensitivity of striated muscles to depolarizing drugs. J Physiol (Lond) 1966; 184: 618-30.
7. Martyn JAJ, White DA, Gronert GA, Jaffe RS, Ward JM. Up-and-down regulation of skeletal muscle acetylcholine receptors. Effects on neuromuscular blockers. Anesthesiology 1992; 76: 822-43.
8. Ibebunjo C, Hall LW. Muscle fibre diameter and sensitivity to neuromuscular blocking drugs. Br J Anaesth 1993; 71: 732-3.
9. Hopkins WG, Brown MC, Keynes RJ. Postnatal growth of motor nerve terminals in muscles of the mouse. J Neurocytol 1985; 14: 525-40.
10. Ibebunjo C, Srikant CS, Donati F. Duration of succinylcholine and vecuronium blockade, but not potency, in seven muscles in the goat correlates with the ratio of endplate area to fibre cross-sectional area. Can J Anaesth 1996; 43: 485-94.
11. Dubowitz V. Muscle Biopsy: A Practical Approach, 2nd ed. London: Baillière Tindall, 1985; 19-128.
12. Robbins N, Olek A, Kelly SS, Takach P, Christopher M. Quantitative study of motor endplates in muscle fibres dissociated by a simple procedure. Proc R Soc Lond BBiol Sci 1980; 209: 555-62.
13. Karnovsky MJ, Roots L. A "direct-coloring" thiocholine method for cholinesterase. J Histochem Cytochem 1964; 12: 219-21.
14. Chang CC, Chuang S-T, Huang MC. Effects of chronic treatment with various neuromuscular blocking agents on the number and distribution of acetylcholine receptors in the rat diaphragm. J Physiol (Lond) 1975; 250: 161-73.
15. Levin TA, Loring RH, Salpeter MM. Neuronal control of acetylcholine receptor turnover rate at a vertebrate neuromuscular junction. Science 1980; 210: 550-1.
16. Barany M. ATPase activity of myosin correlated with speed of muscle shortening. J Gen Physiol 1967; 50: 197-218.
17. Burke RE, Levine DN, Tsairis P, Zajac FE. Physiological types and histochemical profiles in motor units of the cat gastrocnemius. J Physiol (Lond) 1973; 234: 723-48.
18. Kuno M, Turkanis SA, Weakly JN. Correlation between nerve terminal size and transmitter release at the neuromuscular junction of the frog. J Physiol (Lond) 1971; 213: 545-56.
19. Round JM, Jones DA, Edwards RHT. A flexible microprocessor system for the measurement of cell size. J Clin Pathol 1982; 35: 620-4.
20. Banker BQ, Kelly SS, Robbins N. Neuromuscular transmission and correlative morphology in young and old mice. J Physiol (Lond) 1983; 339: 355-75.
21. Albuquerque EX, McIsaac RJ. Fast and slow mammalian muscles after denervation. Exp Neurol 1970; 26: 183-202.
22. Edström L, Lindquist C, Martensson A. Correlation between functional and histochemical properties of the intrinsic laryngeal muscles in the cat. In: Wyke B (Ed). An International Symposium on Ventilatory and Phonatory Control Systems. London: Oxford University Press, 1974; 392-407.
23. Armstrong RB, Saubert CW IV, Seeherman HJ, Taylor CR. Distribution of fiber types in locomotory muscles of dogs. American Journal of Anatomy 1982; 163: 87-98.
24. Ariano MA, Armstrong RB, Edgenon VR. Hindlimb muscle fibre populations of five mammals. J Histochem Cytochem 1973; 21: 51-5.
25. Ibebunjo C. Type, diameter and distribution of the fibres in some respiratory and abdominal muscles of the goat. Vet Res Commun 1993; 17: 171-82.
26. Ibebunjo C. Histochemical and morphometric properties of muscles of the upper airway of goats. Res Vet Sci 1993; 55: 215-23.
27. Ibebunjo C. Morphologic and morphometric characteristics of limb muscles of the goat. Small Ruminant Research 1994; 13: 277-86.
28. Suzuki A. Histochemical properties of the masseter muscle in horses and goats. Tohoku Journal of Agricultural Research 1989; 40: 1-7.
29. Eriksson P-O, Thornell L-E. Histochemical and morphological muscle-fibre characteristics of the human masseter, the medial pterygoid and the temporal muscles. Arch Oral Biol 1983; 28: 781-95.
30. Guth L, Samaha FJ. Erroneous interpretations which may result from application of the 'myofibrillar ATPase' histochemical procedure to developing muscle. Exp Neurol 1972; 34: 465-75.
31. Ringqvist M. Fiber types in human masticatory muscles. Relation to function. Scand J Dent Res 1974; 82: 333-55.
32. Rowlerson A, Mascarello F, Veggetti A, Carpene E. The fibre-type composition of the first branchial arch muscles in carnivora and primates. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 1983; 4: 443-72.
33. Albuquerque EX, Barnard EA, Porter CW, Warnick JE. The density of acetylcholine receptors and their sensitivity in the postsynaptic membrane of muscle endplates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1974; 71: 2818-22.
34. Eldridge L, Liebhold M, Steinbach JH. Alterations in cat skeletal neuromuscular junctions following prolonged inactivity. J Physiol (Lond) 1981; 313: 529-45.
35. Sterz R, Pagala M, Peper K. Postjunctional characteristics of the endplates in mammalian fast and slow muscles. Pflugers Arch 1983; 398: 48-54.
36. Steinbach JH. Developmental changes in acetylcholine receptor aggregates at rat skeletal neuromuscular junctions. Dev Biol 1981; 84: 267-76.
37. Matthews-Bellinger J, Salpeter MM. Distribution of acetylcholine receptors at frog neuromuscular junctions with a discussion of some physiological implications. J Physiol (Lond) 1978; 279: 197-213.
38. Porter CW, Barnard EA, Chiu TH. The ultrastructural localization and quantitation of cholinergic receptors at the mouse motor endplate. J Membr Biol 1973; 14: 383-402.
39. Matthews-Bellinger JA, Salpeter MM. Fine structural distribution of acetylcholine receptors at developing mouse neuromuscular junctions. J Neurosci 1983; 3: 644-57.