Repeat interventions as a long-term treatment strategy in the management of progressive coronary artery disease

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 1398-1405

  Lehmann, Kenneth G ^a   Maas, Arthur C ^b   Van Domburg, Ron ^b   De Feyter, Pim J ^b   Van Brand, Marcel Den ^b   Serruys, Patrick W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESTENOSIS;

EID: 0029972582     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(96)00002-2     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Detre K, Holubkov R, Kelsey S, et al. Co-investigators of National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute's Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in 1985-1986 and 1977-1981: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Registry. N Engl J Med 1988;318:265-70.
2. Parisi AF, Folland ED, Hartigan P. A comparison of angioplasty with medical therapy in the treatment of single vessel coronary artery disease. Veterans Affairs ACME Investigators. N Engl J Med 1992;326:10-6.
3. King SB III, Schlumpf M. Ten-year completed follow-up of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: the early Zurich experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:353-60.
4. Talley JD, Hurst JW, King SB III, et al. Clinical outcome 5 years after attempted percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in 427 patients. Circulation 1988;77:820-9.
5. Weintraub WS, Ghazzal ZM, Cohen CL. et al. Clinical implications of late proven patency after successful coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1991;84: 572-82.
6. Ellis SG, Fisher L, Dushman-Ellis S, et al. Comparison of coronary angioplasty with medical treatment for single-and double-vessel coronary disease with left anterior descending coronary involvement: long-term outcome based on an Emory-CASS registry study. Am Heart J 1989;118:208-20.
7. Rogers WJ, Coggin CJ, Gersh BJ, et al., for CASS investigators. Ten-year follow-up of quality of life in patients randomized to receive medical therapy or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CASS). Circulation 1990;82:1647-58.
8. Peduzzi P, Hultgren H, Thomsen J, Detre K. Ten-year effect of medical and surgical therapy on quality of life: Veterans Administration Cooperative Study of coronary artery surgery. Am J Cardiol 1987;59:1017-23.
9. Laird-Meeter K, ten Katen HJ, Brower RW, et al. Angina pectoris, one to 10 years after aortocoronary bypass surgery. Eur Heart J 1983;4:678-86.
10. Fitzgibbon GM, Leach AJ, Kafka HP, Keon WJ. Coronary bypass graft fate: long-term angiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;17:1075-80.
11. Loop FT, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. Influence of the internal mammary artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med 1986;314:1-6.
12. Foster ED, Fisher LD, Kaiser GC, Myers WO, CASS principal investigators. Comparison of operative mortality and morbidity for initial and repeat coronary artery bypass grafting: the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) registry experience. Ann Thorac Surg 1984;38:563-70.
13. Laird-Meeter K, van den Brand MJ, Serruys PW, et al. Reoperation after aortocoronary bypass procedure. Results in 53 patients in a group of 1041 with consecutive first operations. Br Heart J 1983;50:157-62.
14. Williams DO, Gruentzig AR, Kent KM, Detre KM, Kelsey SF, To T. Efficacy of repeat percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for coronary restcnosis. Am J Cardiol 1984;53:32C-5C.
15. Reeder GS, Krishan I, Nobrega FT, et al. Is percutaneous coronary angioplasty less expensive than bypass surgery? N Engl J Med 1984;311: 1157-62.
16. Kelly ME, Taylor GJ, Moses HW, et al. Comparative cost of myocardial revascularization: percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;5:16-20.
17. Hlatky MA, Lipscomb J, Nelson C, et al. Resource use and cost of initial coronary revascularization: coronary angioplasty versus coronary bypass surgery. Circulation 1990;82 Suppl IV:IV-208-13.
18. Thompson RC, Holmes DR, Gersh BJ, Bailey KR. Predicting early and intermediate-term outcome of coronary angioplasty in the elderly. Circulation 1993;88:1579-87.
19. Elayda MA, Hall RJ, Gray AG, Mathur VS, Cooley DA. Coronary revascularization in the elderly patient. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984;3:398-402.
20. Montague NT III, Kouchoukos NT, Wilson TAS, et al. Morbidity and mortality of coronary bypass grafting in patients 70 years of age and older. Ann Thorac Surg 1985;39:552-7.
21. Nobuyoshi M, Kimura T, Nosaka H, et al. Restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: serial angiographic follow-up of 229 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;12:616-23.
22. Austen WG, Edwards GE, Frye RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the ad hoc committee for grading of coronary artery disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975;51:7-40.
23. van Domburg RT, Sanders WJ, Hoare MR, Zeelenberg C. CLINT, a software package for acquiring and processing multiple choice and numeric data for clinical trials. Computers in Cardiology. Long Beach (CA): IEEE Computer Society, 1984:301-4.
24. Alderman EL, Bourassa MG, Cohen LS, et al., for CASS investigators. Ten-year follow-up of survival and myocardial infarction in the randomized Coronary Artery Surgery Study. Circulation 1990;82:1629-46.