The application of standard and morphometric dating criteria for luteal phase endometrial specimens collected by outpatient sampling

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 103, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 473-474

  Arthur, I D ^a   Khan, S M ^b  

^a ROYAL VICTORIA INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^b ST MARY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LUTEINIZING HORMONE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOMETRIUM; FEMALE; HUMAN; LUTEAL PHASE; MENSTRUAL CYCLE; MORPHOMETRICS; OUTPATIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLING; STANDARDIZATION; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; AMBULATORY CARE; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; COHORT STUDIES; ENDOMETRIUM; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUTEAL PHASE; LUTEINIZING HORMONE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 0029971504     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09777.x     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Noyes RW, Hertig AT, Rock J. Dating the endometrial biopsy. Fertil Steril 1950; 1:3–25.
2. Li TC, Rogers AW, Dockery P, Lenton EA, Cooke ID. A new method of histological dating of human endometrium in the luteal phase. Fertil Steril 1988; 1: 52–60.
3. Eddowes HA. Pipelle: a more acceptable technique for outpatient endometrial biopsy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 961–962.
4. Sheehan AL, Read MD, Codling BW. A comparison of two endometrial samplers. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99: 266–269.
5. Martinez AR, Voorhorst FJ, Schoemaker J. Reliability of urinary LH testing for planning of endometrial biopsies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1992; 43: 137–140.
6. Li TC, Rogers AW, Dockery P, Lenton EA, Cooke ID. A comparison between two methods of chronological dating of the human endometrial biopsies during the luteal phase, and their correlation with histological dating. Fertil Steril 1987; 48: 928–932.