Novel chemistry of carbon bound to cobalt in organocobalt complexes related to B12

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 118, Issue 20, 1996, Pages 4804-4808

  Poison, Suzette M ^a   Hansen, Lory ^a   Marzilli, Luigi G ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COBALT COMPLEX; CYANOCOBALAMIN DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; DRUG STRUCTURE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; X RAY ANALYSIS;

EID: 0029971023     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja953086i     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Zangrando, E.; Bresciani-Pahor, N.; Randaccio, L.; Charland, J.-P.; Marzilli, L. G. Organometallics 1986, 5, 1938-1944.
2. Marzilli, L. G.; Bayo, F.; Summers, M. F.; Thomas, L. B.; Zangrando, E.; Bresciani-Pahor, N.; Mari, M.; Randaccio, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc: 1987, 109, 6045-6052.
3. Charland, J.-P.; Zangrando, E.; Bresciani-Pahor, N.; Randaccio, L.; Marzilli, L. G. Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 4256-4267.
4. Parker, W. O., Jr.; Bresciani-Pahor, N.; Zangrando, E.; Randaccio, L.; Marzilli, L. G. Inorg. Chem. 1985, 24, 3908-3913.
5. Finke, R. G.; Smith, B. L.; McKenna, W. A.; Christian, P. A. Inorg. Chem. 1981, 20, 687-693.
6. 3, the two one-proton singlets at δ 3.15 and 4.09 arise from the methylene bridge from the Co to the N. The more upfield singlet is from the ring proton over the unsaturated equatorial ligand. The imine methyl that was converted to an enamine gives rise to the olefin doublets at δ 5.41 and 5.83, and the three remaining imine methyls give rise to signals in the normal shift range (δ 2.04, 2.28, and 2.41). The lower symmetry increases the number of propylene bridge signals.
7. Poon, C.; Wan, W.; Liao, S. S. T. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1977, 1247-1251.
8. Poznyak, A. L.; Pavlovski, V. I.; Chuklanova, E. B.; Polynova, T. N.; Porai-Koshits, M. A. Monatsh. Chem. 1982, 113, 561-564.
9. 3 after 6 h. NMR spectroscopy was used to estimate the extent of reaction.
10. Noyce, D. S.; Virgilio, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 1972, 37, 2643-2647.
11. Bockrath, B.; Dorfman, L. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 5708-5715.
12. Zhu, L.; Kostic, N. M. Inorg. Chem. 1987, 26, 4194-4197.
13. Gerli, A.; Marzilli, L. G. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 1152-1160.
14. Bjerrum, M. J.; Gajhede, M.; Larsen, E.; Springborg, J. Inorg. Chem. 1988, 27, 3960-3964.
15. Chakraborty, P.; Karmakar, S.; Chandra, S. K.; Chakravorty, A. Inorg. Chem. 1994, 33, 816-822.
16. Kofod, P.; Larsen, E.; Larsen, S.; Peterson, C. H.; Springborg, J.; Wang, D. Acta Chem. Scand. 1992, 46, 841-853.
17. Kanamori, K.; Broderick, W. E.; Jordan, R. F.; Willett, R D.; Legg, J. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 7122-7124.
18. Weiss, M. C.; Gordon, G. C.; Goedken, V. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 857-864.
19. Chevrier, B.; Weiss, R.; Lange, M.; Chottard, J.; Mansuy, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 2899-2901.
20. Mansuy, D.; Mahy, J. P. In Metalloporphyrins Catalyzed Oxidations; Montanari, F., Casella. L., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: The Netherlands, 1994; pp 175-206.
21. Gerli, A.; Sabat, M.; Marzilli, L. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 6711-6718.
22. Unpublished results.
23. Bouzid, M.; Pradère, J. P.; Palvadeau, P.; Vénien, J. P.; Toupet, L. J. Organomet. Chem. 1989, 369, 205-216.
24. Walsh, P. J.; Hollander, F. J.; Bergman, R. G. Organometallics 1993, 12, 3705-3723.
25. Abbenhuis, H. C. L.; van Beizen, R.; Grove, D. M.; Klomp, A. J. A.; van Mier, G. P. M.; Spek, A. L.; van Koten, G. Organometallics 1993, 12, 210-219.
26. Pratt, J. M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1985, 161-170.
27. Randaccio, L.; Bresciani-Pahor, N.; Toscano, P. J.; Marzilli, L. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 6347-6351.
28. Bresciani-Pahor, N.; Randaccio, L.; Toscano, P. J.; Marzilli, L. G. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1982, 567-572.
29. Bresciani-Pahor, N.; Calligaris, M.; Nardin, G.; Randaccio, L. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1982, 2549-2551.
30. Finke, R. G.; Smith, B. L.; Mayer, B. J.; Molinero, A. A. Inorg. Chem. 1983, 22, 3677-3679.
31. Bresciani-Pahor, N.; Forcolin, M.; Marzilli, L. G.; Randaccio, L.; Summers, M. F.; Toscano, P. J. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1985, 63, 1-125.
32. Bresciani-Pahor, N.; Randaccio, L.; Zangrando, E.; Marzilli, P. A. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1989, 1941-1946.
33. Daikh, B. E.; Finke. R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1991, 114, 4160-4172.
34. The TEMPO result could also be explained by a very large cage effect. (Garr, C. D.; Finke, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10440-10445.) However, the high 1 M TEMPO concentrations needed to test for this possibility led to decomposition of the complex.