The analyst's influence

Psychoanalytic Quarterly

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 681-692

  Grossman, Lee ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTHORITY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PSYCHOANALYSIS;

EID: 0029970821     PISSN: 00332828     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/21674086.1996.11927511     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. EISSLER, K. R. (1953). The effect of the structure of the ego on psychoanalytic technique. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 1:104-143.
2. FREUD, S. (1912). The dynamics of transference. S.E., 12.
3. GILL, M. M. (1982). Analysts of Transference, Vol. 1: Theory and Technique. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
4. _ (1991). Indirect suggestion: a response to Oremland's Interpretation and Interaction. In Interpretation and Interaction: Psychoanalysis or Psychotherapy?, ed. J. D. Oremland. Hillsdale, NJ/London: Analytic Press, pp. 137-164.
5. GLOVER, E. (1931). The therapeutic effect of inexact interpretation: a contribution to the theory of suggestion. Int. J. Psychoanal., 12:397-411.
6. LOEWALD, H. W. (1971). Some considerations on repetition and repetition compulsion. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven/London: Yale Univ. Press, 1980, pp. 87-101.
7. PANEL (1991). Classics revisited: Eissler's "The effect of the structure of the ego on psychoanalytic technique." L Friedman, chair. Presented at Fall Meeting of American Psychoanalytic Assn., New York.
8. POLAND, W. S. (1975). Tact as a psychoanalytic function. Int. J. Psychoanal., 56:155-162.
9. RENIK, O. (1993a). Countertransference enactment and the psychoanalytic process. In Psychic Structure and Psychic Change: Essays in Honor of Robert S. Wallerstein, M.D., ed. M. J. Horowitz, O. F. Kernberg & E. M. Weinshel. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 135-158.
10. _ (1993b). Analytic interaction: conceptualizing technique in light of the analyst's irreducible subjectivity. Psychoanal. Q., 62:553-571.
11. STEIN, M. S. (1981). The unobjectionable part of the transference. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 29:869-892.