-
1
-
-
0028874048
-
-
D. D. Ho et al., Nature 373, 123 (1995)
-
(1995)
Nature
, vol.373
, pp. 123
-
-
Ho, D.D.1
-
3
-
-
84984934413
-
-
M. A Nowak et al , ibid. 375, 193 (1995)
-
(1995)
Nature
, vol.375
, pp. 193
-
-
Nowak, M.A.1
-
7
-
-
0028986503
-
-
C Pachl et al., J. Acquired Immune Defic. Syndr. 8, 446 (1995), Y Cao et al., AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 11, 353 (1995).
-
(1995)
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
, vol.11
, pp. 353
-
-
Cao, Y.1
-
9
-
-
13344259567
-
-
note
-
o must balance the virion clearance at rate c.
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
13344249347
-
-
note
-
c/(c-δ)][c exp(-δt) - δ exp(-ct)], the equation introduced by Wei et al. (2) for analysis of the effects of drug treatment on viral load. Their analysis was based on Eqs. 1 and 2 and the assumption that no new infections occur after drug treatment (k = 0 after treatment). Equation 6 is a new model appropriate for protease inhibitors, which do not prevent infections ansing from preexisting mature infectious virions. Because of the symmetry between c and δ in the Wei et al equation, the virion clearance rate cannot be distinguished from the infected cell death rate by data fitting
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
13344282356
-
-
note
-
Because our parameter estimates are based on the assumption of complete inhibition of the production of new infectious virions and no increase in target cells, we expect our parameter estimates to be minimal estimates. Generalizing our model to relax these two assumptions, we can show that 5 is always a minimal estimate and that, with target cell growth, c is typically a minimal estimate We tested how the estimates of c and δ depend on the assumption that ritonavir is 100% effective as follows: We generated viral load data assuming different drug effectivenesses with c = 3 and δ = 0 5. With these "data," we used our fitting procedure to estimate c and δ under the assumption that the drug is 100% effective For data generated with η = 1.0, 0 99, 0 95, and 0.90, we estimated c = 3 000, 3.003, 3.015, and 3.028, respectively, and δ = 0.500, 0.494, 0.470, and 0.441, respectively. Thus, our estimate of c remains essentially unchanged, whereas that of δ is a slight underestimate (for example, for η = 0 95, δ = 0.47 rather than the true 0 5). Consequently, if a drug is not completely effective, cell life-spans may be somewhat less than we estimate. If the target cells are allowed to increase by the maximum factor observed In the five patients (that is, fivefold), we find that the derived values of c and δ are minimal estimates. Thus, for example, for data generated with η = 1, with c = 3.00 and δ = 0.500, we find that our fitting procedure yields estimates of c = 2.76 and δ = 0.499.
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
13344294680
-
-
Vinons that are not released into the extracellular fluid are not included in this estimate. Thus, the total production in the body is even larger
-
Vinons that are not released into the extracellular fluid are not included in this estimate. Thus, the total production in the body is even larger.
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
13344279932
-
-
note
-
The solution to Eq. 3 is equation presented If cellular RNA data were obtained, this equation could be fitted to those data, and the parameter estimates for c and δ could be verified for consistency with the viral kinetics.
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
13344278283
-
-
note
-
p rather than infected cells T' are to be tracked, Eq 1 can be replaced by equation presented Models of this type can also be solved explicitly when ω(t′) is given by a gamma function. M. Nowak and A Herz (personal communication) have solved this model for the case where w(t′) is a delta function, in which case the delay simply adds to the pharmacologie delay and Eq 6 is regained after this combined delay Analysis of current data by nonlinear least squares estimation has so far not allowed accurate simultaneous estimation of c, δ, and the intracellular delay. However, the qualitative effect of including the delay in the model is to increase the estimate of c, which is consistent with our claim that the values of c in Table 1 are minimal estimates. Higher values of c (hence lower values of 1/c) will lead to increased estimates of the intracellular delay, S - (1/c). Thus our estimate of the duration of the intracellular phase, as derived above and given in Table 2, is still a minimal estimate.
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
0027403718
-
-
A. Carmichael, X. Jin, P Sissons, L. Borysiewicz, J. Exp. Med. 177, 249 (1993)
-
(1993)
J. Exp. Med.
, vol.177
, pp. 249
-
-
Carmichael, A.1
Jin, X.2
Sissons, P.3
Borysiewicz, L.4
-
22
-
-
13344284247
-
-
note
-
We thank the patients for participation; A. Hurley, Y. Cao, and scientists at Chiron for assistance; B, Goldstein for the use of his nonlinear least squares fitting package; and G. Bell, T. Kepler, C. Macken, E. Schwartz, and B. Sulzer for helpful discussions and calculations. Portions of this work were performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy. Supported by Abbott Laboratories, grants from NIH (NO1 Al45218 and RR06555) and from the New York University Center for AIDS Research (Al27742) and General Clinical Research Center (MO1 RR00096), the Aaron Diamond Foundation, the Joseph P. Sullivan and Jeanne M. Sullivan Foundation, and the Los Alamos National Laboratory Directed Research and Development program
-
-
-
|