Hearing aids I. Conventional hearing devices

Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 122, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 227-231

  Stach, Brad A ^a   Gulya, A Julianna ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY; DEVICE; HEARING AID; HEARING LOSS; LOUDNESS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; REVIEW; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

HEARING AIDS; HUMANS; MINIATURIZATION; PROSTHESIS FITTING; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOFTWARE;

EID: 0029963937     PISSN: 08864470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1996.01890150005001     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Killion MC. The K-amp hearing aid: an attempt to present high fidelity for persons with impaired hearing. Am J Audiol. 1993;2:52-74.
2. Hickson LMH. Compression amplification in hearing aids Am J Audiol. 1994,3:51-65.
3. VanVliet D, Bentler R, Fabry D, Sweetow R. Armstrong S Debating linear vs nonlinear fittings Hear Instrum. March 1994,45:33-35.
4. Moore BCJ, Johnson JS, Clark TM, Pluvinage V. Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear. 1992:13:349-370.
5. Chasin M. The acoustic advantages of CIC hearing aids Hear J. November 1994;47:13-17.
6. Ebinger K. Surveys evaluate manufacturer, dispenser, and consumer views on ClC hearing aids. Hear J. November 1994,47.45-48.
7. Mueller HG Update on programmable hearing aids Hear J May 1994;47:13-20.
8. Jelonek S Noah/Hi-Pro system offers industry-wide standard for fitting programmables. Hear J. May 1994;47:21-22
9. Valente M, Fabry D, Potts L. Recognition of speech in noise with hearing aids using dual microphones. J Am Acad Audiol. 1995;6:440-449.
10. Ribic Z Hearing Aid for Persons With an Impaired Hearing Faculty US patent 5 214 709, 1993
11. Fabry DA Noise reduction with FM systems in FM/EM mode. Ear Hear. 1994;15 82-86
12. Allen JB, Jeng PS. Loudness growth in 1/2-octave bands (LGOB): a procedure for the assessment of loudness. J Acoust Soc Am. 1990; 88:745-753
13. Cox RM Using loudness data for hearing aid selection: the IHAFF approach. Hear J February 1995;48 10, 39-44.
14. Jerger J, Darling R, Florin E Efficacy of the cued-listening task in the evaluation of binaural hearing aids J Am Acad Audiol 1994:5 279-285.
15. Newman CW, Jacobson GP, Hug GA, Weinstein BE, Malinoff RL. Practical method for quantifying hearing aid benefit in older adults. J Am Acad Audiol. 1991,2:70-75.
16. Cox RM, Alexander GC The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) Ear Hear. 1995; 16:176-186.
17. Silman S, ed. Special issue on late-onset auditory deprivation. J Am Acad Audiol. 1993;4:277-350.
18. Jerger JF, Jerger S, Oliver T, Pirozzolo F. Speech understanding in the elderly. Ear Hear. 1989;10.79-89.
19. Stach BA, Loiselle LH, Jerger JF. Special hearing aid considerations in elderly patients with auditory processing disorders Ear Hear 1991;12:131-138.