Clinical cancer research. Some aspects on doctors' attitudes to informing participants

Acta Oncologica

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 749-754

  Lynöe, Niels ^a   Sandlund, Mikael ^a   Jacobsson, Lars ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISEASES; HEALTH CARE; PATIENT TREATMENT; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS;

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH; INFORMATION POLICY;

ONCOLOGY;

ARTICLE; CANCER RESEARCH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; PATIENT INFORMATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE;

EID: 0029963660     PISSN: 0284186X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/02841869609084010     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Appelbaum PS, Roth LH. Competency to consent to research. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1982; 39: 951-8.
2. Stanley B, Guido J, Stanley M, Shortell D. The elderly and informed consent. Empirical findings. JAMA 1984; 252: 1302-6.
3. Silva MC, Sorell JM. Enhancing comprehension of information for informed consent: A review of empirical research. IRB. A review of human subjects research. A publication of New York: The Hastings Centre, 1988; 10: 1-5.
4. Simes RJ, Tattersall MHN, Coates AS, Raghavan D, Solomen HJ, Smartt H. Randomised comparison of procedures for obtaining informed consent in clinical trials of treatment for cancer. Br Med J 1986; 293: 1065-8.
5. Cassileth BR, Zupkis RB, Sutton-Smith K, March V. Informed consent - why are its goals imperfectly realized? Engl J Med 1980; 302: 896-900.
6. Kennedy BJ, Lilehaugen A. Patient recall of informed consent. Med Paediatr Oncol 1979; 7: 173-8.
7. Taub HA. Informed consent, memory, and age. Gerontologist 1980; 20: 686-90.
8. Lynöe N, Sandlund M, Dahlqvist G, Jacobsson L. Informed consent: study of the quality of information given to participants in a clinical trial. Br Med J 1991; 303: 610-3.
9. Wager E, Tooley PJH, Emanuel MB, Wood SF. Get patients' consent to enter clinical trials. Br Med J 1995; 311: 734-7.
10. Slevin M, Mossman J, Bowling R Leonard R. et al. Volunteers or victims: patients' views of randomised cancer clinical trials. Br J Cancer 1995; 71: 1270-4.
11. Östergaard Thomsen O, Wulff HR, Martin A, Singer PA. What do gastroenterologist in Europe tell cancer patients? Lancet 1993; 341: 473-6.
12. Zelen M. A new design for randomized clinical trials. N Engl J Med 1979; 300: 1242-5.
13. Taube A. Zelens modeller för randomisering (Zelen's models for randomisation). Lakartidningen 1994; 91: 977-82.
14. Hermerén G, Hjemdahl P, Gahrton G. Patientens medbestämmande starkt krav vid medicinsk forskning (The patient's right to determine is a heavy demand in clinical research). Lakartidningen 1992; 89: 1379-80.
15. Parmar MKB. Randomization before consent: Practical and ethical considerations. In Williams CJ. Introducing new treatments for cancer. Practical, ethical and legal problems. Chichester: Wiley, 1992.
16. Holmberg L, Taube A, Glimelius B. Hur man underlättar den svåra randomiseringen (How to facilitate the difficult procedure of randomisation). Lakartidningen 1992; 89: 545-7.
17. Werkö L. Moment 22 för klinisk forskning. (Moment 22 in clinical research. Ethically defensible applying new treatment without assessment?). Lakartidningen 1995; 92: 835-6.
18. Williams CJ, Zwitter M. Informed consent in european multicentre randomised clinical trials - Are patients really informed? Eur J Cancer 1994; 30A: 907-10.