A regional approach to the classic metaphyseal lesion in abused infants: The proximal humerus

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 167, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 1399-1403

  Kleinman, Paul K ^a   Marks Jr , Sandy C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CHILD; CHILD ABUSE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; HUMERUS FRACTURE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0029963467     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.167.6.8956566     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Caffey J. Some traumatic lesions in growing bones other than fractures and dislocations: clinical and radiologic features. Br J Radiol 1957;30:225-238
2. Kleinman PK, Marks SC Jr, Blackbourne BD. The metaphyseal lesion in abused infants: radiologic-histopathologic study. AJR 1986;146:895-905
3. Kleinman PK, Marks SC Jr, Richmond JM, Blackbourne BD. Inflicted skeletal injury: postmortem radiologic-histopathologic study in 31 infants. AJR 1995;165:647-650
4. Kleinman PK, Marks SC Jr. A regional approach to the metaphyseal lesion in abused infants: proximal tibia. AJR 1996;166:421-426
5. Kleinman PK, Marks SC Jr. A regional approach to the metaphyseal lesion in abused infants: distal tibia. AJR 1996;166:1207-1212
6. Ogden JA. Humerus. In: Ogden JA, ed. Skeletal injury in the child. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1982:221-282
7. Kleinman PK, Belanger PL, Karellas A, Spevak MR. Normal metaphyseal radiologic variants not to be confused with infant abuse. AJR 1991;156:781-783
8. Jee WSS. The skeletal tissues. In: Weiss L, ed. Histology cell and tissue biology, 5th ed. New York: Elsevier, 1983;238-243
9. Laval-Jeantet M, Balmain N, Juster M, Bernard J. Les rapports de la virole perichondrale et du cartilage en croissance normale et pathologique. Ann Radiol (Paris) 1968;11:327-335
10. Oestreich AR, Ahmad BS. The periphysis and its effect on the metaphysis. I. Definition and normal radiographic pattern. Skeletal Radiol 1992;21:283-286
11. Kleinman PK, Marks SC Jr. Relationship of the subperiosteal bone collar to the metaphyseal lesions in abused infants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77-A:1471-1476
12. Kleinman PK, Marks SC Jr, Spevak MR, Belanger PL, Richmond JM. Extension of the growth-plate cartilage into the metaphysis: sign of healing fracture in abused infants. AJR 1991;156:775-779
13. Osier LK, Marks SC Jr, Kleinman PK. Metaphyseal extensions of hypertrophied chondrocytes in abused infants indicate healing fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 1993;13:249-254
14. Worlock P, Stower M, Barbor P. Patterns of fractures in accidental and non-accidental injury in children: a comparative study. Br Med J 1986;293:100-102
15. Loder RT, Bookout C. Fracture patterns in battered children. J Orthop Trauma 1991;5:428-433
16. Kleinman PK, Nimkin K, Spevak MR, et al. Follow-up skeletal surveys in suspected child abuse. AJR 1996;167:893-896
17. Jaramillo D, Laor T, Zaleske DJ. Indirect trauma to the growth plate: results of MR imaging after epiphyseal and metaphyseal injury in rabbits. Radiology 1993;187:171-178
18. Silverman FN. Radiology and other imaging procedures. In: Helfer RE, Kempe RS, eds. The battered child, 4th ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987:214-246
19. Salter RB, Harris WR. Injuries involving the epiphyseal plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1963;45-A:587-622
20. Kleinman PK. Extremity trauma. In: Kleinman PK, ed. Diagnostic imaging of child abuse. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins. 1987:29-66
21. Snedecor ST, Wilson HB. Some obstetrical injuries to the long bones. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1949;31-A:378-384