Confidence intervals for measures of interaction

Epidemiology

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 286-290

  Assmann, Susan F ^a,b   Hosmer, David W ^a   Lemeshow, Stanley ^a   Mundt, Kenneth A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES   (United States)

Author keywords

confidence intervals; interaction; simulation study

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0029962280     PISSN: 10443983     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001648-199605000-00012     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Rothman KJ. Modern Epidemiology. Boston: Little, Brown, 1986.
2. Pearce N. Analytical implications of epidemiological concepts of interaction. Int J Epidemiol 1989;18:976-980.
3. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Walker AM. Concepts of interaction. Am J Epidemiol 1980;112:467-470.
4. Walker AM. Proportion of disease attributable to the combined effect of two factors. Int J Epidemiol 1981;10:81-85.
5. Jennings DE. How do we judge confidence-interval adequacy? Am Stat 1987;41:334-337.
6. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Confidence interval estimation of interaction. Epidemiology 1992;3:452-456.
7. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. London: Chapman & Hall, 1993.
8. Hamilton LC. Bootstrap programming. Stata Tech Bull 1991;4:18-27.
9. Hertz-Picciotto I, Smith AH, Holtzman D, Lipsett M, Alexeeff G. Synergism between occupational arsenic exposure and smoking in the induction of lung cancer. Epidemiology 1992;3:23-31.
10. Mundt DJ, Kelsey JL, Golden AL, Panjabi MM, Pastides H, Berg AT, Sklar J, Hosea T, Northeast Collaborative Group on Low Back Pain. An epidemiologic study of sports and weight lifting as possible risk factors for hemiated lumbar and cervical discs. Am J Sports Med 1993;21:854-860.
11. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Stat Sci 1986;1:54-77.