Myths, realities, and the political world: The anthropology of insanity defense attitudes

Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 5-26

  Perlin, Michael L ^a  

^a NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE; CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HOMICIDE; HUMAN; MENTAL DISEASE; POLITICS; REVIEW; SOCIOLOGY;

ETHICS; HUMANS; INSANITY DEFENSE; JURISPRUDENCE; PHILOSOPHY; RELIGION AND MEDICINE; SOCIAL VALUES;

EID: 0029962248     PISSN: 0091634X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (140)

1. MacKenzie: New code would alter rules of insanity. Washington Post. October 12, 1975, at C6
2. Perlin ML: Unpacking the myths: the symbolism mythology of insanity defense jurisprudence. Case W Res L Rev 40:599-731 (1989-1990)
3. Perlin ML: "The things we do for love": John Hinckley's trial and the future of the insanity defense in the federal courts. NYL Sch L Rev 30:857-68, 1985
4. Milner N: What's old and new about the insanity plea. Judicature 67:497-505, 1984
5. 18 USC § 17 (1988)
6. Reform of the Federal insanity defense. Hearings before the Subcommittee on Criminal Justice of the Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives, 98th Cong, 1st Sess 552, 553 (1983) (statement of Rep Coughlin)
7. Reagan advisor Edwin Meese enunciates administration's crime control goals. Crim Just Newsletter 12:4, 1981
8. The insanity defense. Hearings before the Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate, 97th Cong, 2d Sess 18 (1982) (statement of Sen Quayle)
9. Id. at 25 (testimony of Sen Symms)
10. Insanity defense in Federal Courts. Hearings before the Subcommittee on Criminal Justice of the Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives, 97th Cong, 2d Sess 19 (1982) (statement of Rep Myers)
11. Roberts S: High U.S. officials express outrage, asking for new laws on insanity plea. New York Times. June 23, 1982, at B6; supra note 8, at 3, 9-10 (statement of Sen. Hatch)
12. Mickenberg I: A pleasant surprise: the guilty but mentally ill verdict has both succeeded in its own right and successfully preserved the traditional role of the insanity defense. U Cin L Rev 55:943, 980, 1987 (quoting Roberts, supra note 11)
13. The insanity defense, supra note 8, at 38
14. Insanity defense in federal courts, supra note 10, at 151 (testimony of Cong. Lagomarsino); and see id. at 153 (comment by Cong. Conyers)
15. Myths and realities: hearing transcript of the National Commission on the Insanity Defense. 36 (1983)
16. Callahan L, et al: The volume and characteristics of insanity defense pleas: an eight-state study. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 19:331, 1991
17. Steadman H, et al: Before and After Hinckley: evaluating insanity defense reform. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 45:138, 1993
18. H.R. Rep No. 577, 98th Cong, 1st Sess 10 (1983)
19. Herman S: The insanity defense in fact and fiction: on Norval Morris's Madness and the Criminal Law. Am B Found Res J 385:385, 1985
20. Bazelon D: The dilemma of criminal responsibility. 72 Ky LJ 263, 263 (1982-1983)
21. Smith R: Trial by Medicine: The Insanity Defense in Victorian England. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1981, p 31
22. Biggs J: The Guilty Mind. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1955, pp 38, 39
23. Neaman J: Suggestion of the Devil: The Origins of Madness. New York: Doubleday, 1975, p 31
24. Society for Good Will to Retarded Children, Inc. v. Cuomo, 572 F Supp 1300, 1304 (EDNY 1983)
25. Foucault M: Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. Howard R, tr. New York: Pantheon, 1965, p 15
26. Neaman J, supra note 23, at 55
27. Rowland CK et al: Presidential effects on criminal justice policy in the lower Federal Courts: the Reagan judges. 22 Law Soc'y Rev 191, 194 (1988)
28. Krisberg B: Are you now or have you ever been a sociologist? J Crim L Criminol 82: 141, 1991
29. Guttmacher M: The psychiatric approach to crime and correction. Law Contemp Probs 23:633, 1958
30. Id. at 642
31. Boldt R: Restitution, criminal law, and the ideology of individuality. J Crim L Criminol 77:969-1004, 1986
32. Diamond B: From Durham to Brawner, a futile journey. Wash U LQ 109, 110 (1973)
33. Flugel JC: Man, Morals and Society. Independence, MO: Internatl Universities Press, 1970, pp 169-70
34. Sender B: Crime and communication: an interpretive theory of the insanity defense and the mental elements of crime. Geo LJ 74:1371-1428, 1986
35. Flugel JC, supra note 33, at 150
36. Rodriguez J et al: The insanity defense under siege: legislative assaults and legal rejoinders. Rutgers LJ 14:397-402, 1983
37. Perlin ML: Whose plea is it anyway? insanity defense myths and realities. Phila Med 79: 5-6, 1983
38. Rodriguez et al., supra note 36, at 401 (footnotes omitted); see also, Callahan et al., supra note 16.
39. Rodriguez et al., supra note 36, at 402
40. Steadman H et al: Factors associated with a successful insanity plea. Am J Psychiatry 140:401-3, 1983
41. Rodriguez et al., supra note 33, at 401-2
42. Steadman et al., supra note 16, at 58-61
43. Rodriguez et al., supra note 33, at 403-4
44. Pogrebin M et al: Not guilty by reason of insanity: a research note. Int J Law Psychiatry 8:237, 240, 1986
45. Steadman et al., supra note 16, at 58-61
46. Rodriguez et al., supra note 33, at 404
47. Hawkins MR, Pasewark R: Characteristics of persons utilizing the insanity plea. Psychol Rep 53:191-4, 1983
48. Rogers R et al: Insanity defense: contested or conceded? Am J Psychiatry 141:885, 1984
49. Fukunaga K et al: Insanity plea: interexaminer agreement in concordance of psychiatric opinion and court verdict. Law Hum Behav 5:325-6, 1981
50. Perlin ML: The Supreme Court, the mentally disabled criminal defendant, and symbolic values: random decisions, hidden rationales, or "doctrinal abyss"? 29 Ariz L Rev 1, 86-7 (1987)
51. Wasyliw O et al: Beyond the scientific limits of expert testimony, Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 13:147-52, 1985 ("Public decisions are often so close to impossible that those charged with making them are more than anxious to pass their burdens to unwilling experts.")
52. Merelman R: On culture and politics in America: a perspective from structural anthropology. Brit J Pol Sci 19:465-72, 1989
53. Id. at 470
54. Mossman D: Deinstitutionalization, homelessness, and the myth of psychiatric abandonment: a structural anthropology perspective. Unpublished manuscript, at 4, quoting Leach E: Anthropological approaches to the study of the Bible during the twentieth century, in Structuralist Interpretations of Biblical Myth. Edited by Leach E, Aycock D. 1983, p 7
55. Mossman D: Deinstitutionalization, homelessness, and the myth of psychiatric abandonment: a structural anthropology perspective. Unpublished manuscript, at 4, quoting Leach E: Anthropological approaches to the study of the Bible during the twentieth century, in Structuralist Interpretations of Biblical Myth. Edited by Leach E, Aycock D. 1983, p 7
56. Id.
57. Lévi-Strauss C: The Savage Mind. Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1966, p 3
58. Fabrega H: Culture and psychiatric illness: biomedical and ethnomedical aspects, in Cultural Conceptions of Mental Health and Therapy. Edited by Marsella AJ, White GM. 1982, p 45
59. Id. at 51
60. Young A: When rational men fall sick: an inquiry into some assumptions made by medical anthropologists. Culture Med Psychiatry 5:317-19, 1981
61. Merelman, supra note 51, at 473
62. Id. at 477
63. Mossman, supra note 53, at 13 (emphasis in original)
64. 471 F 2d 969, 985 (DC Cir 1972)
65. Al-Khazen J: Good morning: The Beirut syndrome. Moneyclips. December 12, 1994
66. Insanity Defense on Trial. St. Louis Post-Dispatch, February 23, 1995, p 6B
67. Gogek J, Gogek E: Why the public hates the insanity defense. Los Angeles Daily Journal, January 5, 1995
68. Williams R: The logic is very clear. Houston Chronicle, February 10, 1995, p 31
69. Overton R: Talk of legal insanity law resurfaces: to close loophole in legal system. Greensboro (NC) News & Record, August 14, 1994, p A1
70. Fernau K: Tough law makes pleading insanity harder to prove; killers face roadblock in quest for freedom. Phoenix Gazette, May 16, 1994, pA1
71. Sowell T: Insanity defense subverts justice. St. Louis Post-Dispatch, February 16, 1994, p 7B
72. Sanity on insanity. Boston Globe, April 1, 1994, p 18
73. Angelotta J: Insanity not a scientific term. Cleveland Plain Dealer, April 14, 1994, p 11B
74. Terzian P: Is Colin Ferguson insane? Not enough to duck prison. Rocky Mountain News, March 28, 1995, p 27A
75. Sorrentino J: Invasion of the white coats: psychology 'experts' assail idea that people are responsible for their actions. Los Angeles Daily Journal, February 4, 1994
76. McWhirter C: Ohio's insane criminals serve short terms; 45% released from custody since 1988. Cincinnati Enquirer, December 18, 1994, p A01
77. Simon R: Was Lorena Bobbitt's act 'an irresistible impulse'? Baltimore Sun, January 12, 1994, p 2A
78. Sevilla G: At rapist's sanity trial, woman recounts attack; assault was 'methodical,' victim says. Washington Post, April 6, 1994, p B6
79. Lin B: Jury rejects insanity defense, convicts ex-TCU student of murder. Houston Post, January 7, 1994, p A22
80. Terzian, supra note 72
81. Carr C: Savona case spotlights issue of insanity vs. responsibility. Buffalo News, August 21, 1994, p 7
82. Garcia G: Delay asked in Filiaggi Trial. Cleveland Plain Dealer, January 6, 1995, p 1B
83. Taylor B: Kaplan heard orders to shoot, lawyer says. Orlando Sentinel, February 1, 1995, p C1
84. Sullivan R: Bridge gunman thought of Beirut, witness says. N.Y. Times, November 22, 1994, p B3
85. Pelton T: Robles is sane, expert testifies. Chicago Tribune, December 21, 1994, p 1
86. Jury gets Duran case. Tampa Tribune, April 4, 1995, p 5
87. Brown JW: Lawyer calls client a monster; jury told man was insane during slaying of librarian. Phoenix Gazette, April 5, 1994, p B1
88. Kaufman B: Benchmarks: murder conviction is upheld; appeals judges reject race, publicity claims. Cincinnati Enquirer, October 2, 1994, p B06
89. McWhirter C: 'What do you do with them?' Cincinnati Enquirer, December 18, 1994, p A14
90. Aucoin D: Move afoot to replace insanity plea in Mass. Boston Globe, March 31, 1994, p 34
91. Prisoners, gun control lose in session. United Press Int., September 1, 1994
92. Baden P: Foley says Wynia isn't being tough enough on crime. Star Tribune, August 19, 1994, p 2B
93. Williams L: Republicans take Curry to task for votes in 1979-1981. Hartford Courant, October 29, 1994, p A10
94. Duffy J: Ark. strives to develop law on insane criminals. Memphis Commercial Appeal, November 18, 1994, p 1B
95. Williams L: Rowland's new television campaign ads. Hartford Courant, October 21, 1994, p A14
96. Fisher accused of about-face on insanity plea. Columbus Dispatch, October 21, 1994, p 5C
97. Levine K: Insanity defense questioned. Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, April 11, 1994, p 28
98. Fong T: Coffman wins GOP Senate seat vacated by Owens. Rocky Mountain News, December 16, 1994, p 20A
99. Sanity on insanity. Boston Globe, April 1, 1994
100. Insanity should be an explanation, not an excuse, for criminal behavior. Ft. Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel, April 3, 1994, p 4G
101. Perspective: what other newspapers are saying. Chicago Tribune, April 9, 1994, p 19
102. Hamstra H: Crime solution. Fresno Bee, January 11, 1994, p B4
103. Calvino L: Too much time, Fresno Bee, February 12, 1995, p B10
104. Resnick P: Perceptions of psychiatric testimony: a historical perspective on the hysterical invective. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 14:203-6, 1986
105. Wasyliw et al., supra note 50, at 151
106. Perlin ML: Psychodynamics and the insanity defense: "Ordinary Common Sense" and Heuristic Reasoning. Neb L Rev 69:3, 1990
107. Saks M, Kidd R: Human information processing and adjudication: trial by heuristics. Law Socy Rev 15:123-37, 1980-1981
108. Snyder M, et al: Social perception and interpersonal behaviors: on the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. J Pers Soc Psychol 35:656, 1977
109. State Farm Fire & Casualty Ltd. v. Wicka, 474 NW 2d 324, 327 (Minn 1991)
110. Perlin ML: Psychiatric testimony in a criminal setting. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 3:143-147, 1975
111. Lasswell H: Foreword, in Richard Arens, The Insanity Defense 1974, p xi
112. Sherwin R: Dialects and dominance: a study of rhetorical fields in the law of confessions. U Pa L Rev 136:729-37, 1988
113. Id. at 738
114. Perlin ML: On "sanism." SMU L Rev 46:373, 1992
115. Perlin ML: Therapeutic jurisprudence: understanding the sanist and pretextual bases of mental disability law. New Engl J Crim Civ Confinement 20:369, 1994
116. Perlin ML: Pretexts and mental disability law: the case of competency. U Miami L Rev 47:625, 1993
117. Appelbaum P: The empirical jurisprudence of the United States Supreme Court. Am J Law Med 13:335-44, 1987
118. Tanford JA: The limits of scientific jurisprudence: the Supreme Court and psychology. Ind LJ 66:137, 144-50 (1990)
119. Faigman D: "Normative constitutional fact-finding": exploring the empirical component of constitutional interpretation. U Pa L Rev 139:541-81, 1991
120. Woolhandler A: Rethinking the judicial reception of legislative facts. Vand L Rev 41: 111-25, 1988
121. Perlin ML: Are courts competent to decide questions of competency?: stripping the facade from United States v. Charters. U Kan L Rev 38:957, 986-93, 1990
122. Sendor, supra note 34, at 1372
123. Arens R, Susman J: Judges, jury charges, and insanity. 12 Howard LJ 1, 34 n. 43 (1966)
124. Hans V: An Analysis of Public Attitudes Toward the Insanity Defense. Criminology 24:393-411, 1986
125. Roberts C, et al: Implicit theories of criminal responsibility, decision making and the insanity defense. Law Hum Behav 11:207, 1987
126. Final report of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Ad Hoc Forensic Advisory Panel. Ment Phys Dis Law Rep 12:77-96, 1988
127. Parry J: The civil-criminal dichotomy in insanity commitment and release proceedings: Hinckley and other matters. Ment Phys Dis Law Rep 11:218-23, 1987
128. Francois v. Henderson, 850 F 2d 231, 234 (5th Cir 1988)
129. Woolhandler, supra note 118, at 119
130. Berk R: The role of subjectivity in criminal justice classification and prediction methods. Crim Just Ethics 7:35, 1988
131. Bazelon D: The defective assistance of counsel. U Cinn L Rev 42:1-2, 1973
132. Perlin ML: What is therapeutic jurisprudence? NY L Sch J Hum Rts 10:623, 1993
133. Wexler D (Ed.): Therapeutic Jurisprudence: The Law as a Therapeutic Agent. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 1990
134. Wexler D, Winick B (Eds.): Essays in Therapeutic Jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 1991
135. Wexler D: Putting mental health into mental health law: therapeutic jurisprudence. Law Hum Behav 16:27, 1992
136. Perlin ML: Mental Disability Law: Civil and Criminal. Charlottesville, VA: Michie Co., 1989, §1.05A (1994 Supp)
137. Perlin ML: Law and Mental Disability. Charlottesville, VA: Michie Co., 1994, §5.01
138. Scott D et al: Monitoring insanity acquittees: Connecticut Psychiatric Review Board. Hosp Community Psychiatry 41:980-2, 1990
139. Roberts et al., supra note 123, at 226
140. Golding S: Mental health professionals and the courts: The ethics of expertise. Int J Law Psychiatry 13:281-7, 1990