Cost-effectiveness of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in comparison with donor insemination

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 75, Issue 8, 1996, Pages 734-737

  Granberg, Maria ^a,b   Wikland, Matts ^a   Hamberger, Lars ^a  

^a SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b Fertilitets Centrum   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cost; Donor insemination; ICSI

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; COST CONTROL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DELIVERY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE INFERTILITY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0029958592     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00016349609065737     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet 1992; 340: 17-8.
2. Van Steirteghem A, Liu J, Joris H, Nagy Z. Janssenwillen C, Tournaye H et al. Higher success rate by intracytoplasmic sperm injection than by subzonal insemination. Report of a second series of 300 consecutive treatment cycles. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 1055-60.
3. Svalander P, Forsberg A-S, Jakobsson A-H, Wikland M. Factors of importance for the establishment of a successful program of intracytoplasmatic sperm injection treatment for male infertility. Fertil Steril 1995; 63: 828-37.
4. Sherins RJ, Thorsell LP, Dorfman A, Dennison-Lagos L, Calvo LP, Krysa L et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection facilitates fertilization even in the most severe forms of male infertility: pregnancy outcome correlates with maternal age and number of eggs available. Fertil Steril 1995; 64: 369-75.
5. Gray DT, Thorburn J, Lundorff P, Strandell A, Lindblom B. A cost-effectiveness study of a randomised trial of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy. Lancet 1995; 345: 1139-43.
6. Ethason J, Petz L, Keeler E, Calhoun L, Kleinman S, Snider C et al. The cost effectiveness of preoperative autologous blood donations. N Engl J Med 1995; 11: 719-24.
7. The Euroqol Group. Euroqol - A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16: 199-208.
8. Silber SJ, Devroey P, Tournaye H, Van Steirteghem A. Fertilizing capacity of epididymal and testicular sperm using intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Reprod Fertil Dev 1995; 7: 281-93.
9. Schover LR, Collins RL, Ricards S. Psychological aspects of donor insemination: evaluation and follow-up of recipient couples. Fertil Steril 1992; 57: 583-90.
10. Granberg M, Wikland M, Nilsson L, Hamberger L. Couples' willingness to pay for IVF/ET. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1995; 74: 199-202.
11. Van Steirteghem A, Nagy Z, Joris H, Liu J, Staessen C, Smitz J et al. High fertilization and implantation rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 1061-6.
12. Socialstyrelsen LR-enheten, Givarinseminationsverksamheten 1989-1994, [Swedish Medical Board, Annual reports of donor inseminations 1989-1994].
13. Depypere HT, Gordts S, Campo R, Comhaire F. Methods to increase the success rate of artificial insemination with donor semen. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 661-3.
14. Shenfield F, Doyle P, Valentine A, Steele SJ, Tan SL. Effects of age, gravidity and male infertility status on cumulative conception rate following artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor semen: analysis of 2998 cycles of treatment in one center over 10 years. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 60-4.
15. Ahmed Ebbiary NA, Martin K, Gibbs A, D'arcy Y, Afnan M, Newton JR. Spontaneous ovulatory cycle donor insemination programme: prognostic indicators of a successful pregnancy. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 1852-8.