Automatic sensor adjustment in a rate modulated pacemaker

PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Volumn 19, Issue 11 II, 1996, Pages 1809-1812

  Gentzler, Richard D ^a,c   Lucas, Eric H ^b  

^a LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Pacesetter Inc   (United States)

^c Pacemaker Services Dept   (United States)

Author keywords

automaticity; pacemaker; rate modulation; sensor; sensor slope

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; BIOSENSOR; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEART AUTOMATICITY; HEART PACING; HEART RATE; HISTOGRAM; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PULSE GENERATOR;

EID: 0029957179     PISSN: 01478389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03230.x     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Bernstein A, Irwin M, Personnet V, et. al. NASPE Policy Conference on Antibradycardia Pacemaker Follow-Up: Effectiveness, needs, and resources. PACE 1994; 14(I):1714-1729.
2. Sulke N, Dritsas A, Chambers J, et. al. Is accurate rate response programming necessary? PACE 1990; 13:1031-1044.
3. Hayes D, VonFeldt L, Higano S. Standardized informal exercise testing for programming rate adaptive pacemakers. PACE 1991; 14(II):1772-1776.
4. McGrew F, Hamilton B, Strong S. Comparison of manual and "auto" activity threshold feature in a rate adaptive pacemaker, (abstract) PACE 1993; 16(II):905.
5. Bornzin G, Tyler J, Arambula E. Comparison of a new activity auto slope algorithm with clinically obtained slope settings. (abstract) Eur JCPE 1994; 4(II):50.