Simple ligation vs stump inversion in appendicectomy

Annales Chirurgiae et Gynaecologiae

Volumn 85, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 222-224

  Lavonius, M I ^a   Liesjarvi S ^b   Niskanen, R O ^b   Ristkari, S K K ^b   Korkala, O ^b   Mokka, R E M ^b  

^a TURKU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^b NONE

Author keywords

appendectomy; appendicitis; operative methods

Indexed keywords

APPENDECTOMY; APPENDICITIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIGATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; APPENDECTOMY; APPENDICITIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; LIGATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0029956365     PISSN: 03559521     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Cleland G: Caecocolic intussusception following appendicectomy. Br J Surg 41: 108, 1953
2. Engstrom L, Fenyö G. Appendicectomy: assessment of stump invagination versus simple ligation: a prospective, randomized trial. Br J Surg 72: 971, 1985
3. Greenall MJ, Bakran A et al: A double-blind trial of a single intravenous dose of metronidazole as prophylaxis against wound infection following appendicectomy. Br J Surg 66: 428, 1979
4. Hortolomei N: Soll man den Appendixstumpf nach Appendektomie versenken oder nicht. Zentralbl Chir 58: 2379, 1931 (in German)
5. Kingsley DPE: Some observations on appendectomy with particular reference to technique. Br J Surg 56(7): 492, 1969
6. Kohler B: Ueber Stumpfversorgung bei der Wurmfortsatzentfernung. Munchener Medizinische Wochenschrift (Munich) 73: 1076, 1926 (in German)
7. Mayo, CW: Appendicitis. Southwestern Medicine (El Paso Tx) 18: 397, 1934
8. Ochsner A, Lilly G: The technique of appendectomy with particular reference to the treatment of the appendical strump. Surgery 2: 532, 1937
9. Richards W, Watson D et al: A review of the results of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surgery 177: 473, 1993
10. Sinha AP: Appendicectomy: an assessment of the advisability of stump invagination. Br J Surg 64: 499, 1977
11. Street D, Balazs I: Simple ligation vs stump inversion in appendectomy. Arch Surg 123: 689, 1988
12. Tate JJT, Chung SCS et al: Conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 80: 761, 1993
13. Watters DAK, Walker MA, Abernethy EC: The appendix stump: should it be invaginated? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 66: 92, 1984