Is general practice audit alive and well? The view from Portsmouth

British Journal of General Practice

Volumn 46, Issue 413, 1996, Pages 735-736

  Lewis, Charles ^a   Combes, Dee ^a  

^a QUEEN ALEXANDRA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Medical audit; Questionnaire

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA BASE; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; MEDICAL AUDIT; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED KINGDOM;

ENGLAND; FAMILY PRACTICE; FINANCIAL SUPPORT; HUMANS; MEDICAL AUDIT;

EID: 0029954617     PISSN: 09601643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Stewart A, Jhanjee VK. Sandwell MAAG report. Audit Trends 1994; 2: 80-82.
2. Webster J. Liverpool MAAG report. Audit Trends 1993; 1: 124-125.
3. Johnson R. Where have all the pennies gone? The work of the Manchester medical audit advisory group. BMJ. 1994; 309: 98-102.
4. Lervy B, Wareham K, Cheung WY. Practice characteristics associated with audit activity: a medical audit advisory group survey. Br J Gen Pract 1994; 44: 311-314.
5. Department of Health. Medical audit in the family practitioner services. [Health Circular (FP) (90) 8.] London: HMSO, 1990.
6. Baker R, Robertson N, Farooqi A. Audit in general practice: factors influencing participation. BMJ 1995; 311: 31-34.