Intestinal fat differentially suppresses sham feeding of different gustatory stimuli

American Journal of Physiology - Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology

Volumn 270, Issue 5 39-5, 1996, Pages

  Foster, L A ^a   Nakamura, K ^b   Greenberg, D ^b   Norgren, R ^b  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

food intake; palatability; satiety; taste

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FAT INTAKE; FOOD INTAKE; GUSTATORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; MALE; NONHUMAN; PALATABILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SATIETY; TASTE;

EID: 0029954051     PISSN: 03636119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.1996.270.5.r1122     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Antin, J., J. Gibbs, J. Holt, R. C. Young, and G. P. Smith. Cholecystokinin elicits the complete behavioral sequence of satiety in rats. J. Comp. Physiol. Psych. 89: 784-790, 1975.
2. Antin, J., J. Gibbs, and G. P. Smith. Intestinal satiety requires pregastric food stimulation. Physiol. Behav. 18: 421-425, 1977.
3. Baile, C. A., W. Zinn, and J. Mayer. Feeding behavior of monkeys: glucose utilization rate and site of glucose entry. Physiol. Behav. 6: 537-541, 1971.
4. SAS. User's Guide: Statistics. Cary, NC: SAS Inst. Inc., 1985.
5. Sclafani, A., and J. W. Nissenbaum. Is gastric sham feeding really sham feeding? Am. J. Physiol. 248 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 17): R387-R390, 1985.
6. Sunday, S. R., S. A. Sanders, and G. Collier. Palatability and meal patterns. Physiol. Behav. 30: 915-918, 1983.