Alternative blood glucose monitoring strips for the One Touch system

Laboratory Medicine

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 404-407

  Bernbaum, Maria ^a,b   Albert, Stewart G ^a   Miller, Deborah ^a   Stich, Tamara ^a   Hoffmann, Joseph W ^a   Mooradian, Arshag D ^a  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HOME MONITORING; INSULIN TREATMENT; LABORATORY TEST; RELIABILITY;

EID: 0029952627     PISSN: 00075027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/labmed/27.6.404     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Bland IM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310.
2. American Diabetes Association. Consensus statement. Self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care. 1994;17:81-86.
3. Bernbaum M, Albert SG, McGinnis J, et al. Laboratory assessment of glucose meters does not predict reliability of clinical performance. Lab Med. 1994;25:32-34.
4. Lenhard MJ, DeCherney GS, Maser RE, Patten BC, Kubik J. A comparison between alternate and trade name glucose tests strips. Diabetes Care. 1995;18:686-689.
5. Nettles A. User error in blood glucose monitoring. The National Steering Committee for Quality Assurance. Diabetes Care. 1993;16:946-948.