The noise level in magnetic stimulation

Scandinavian Audiology

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 223-226

  Starck, Jukka ^a   Rimpiläinen, Ilpo ^b   Pyykkö, Ilmari ^c   Esko, Toppila ^a  

^a FINNISH INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH   (Finland)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Magnetic stimulation; Peak noise level; Risk for hearing loss

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; MAGNETIC FIELD; NOISE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND LEVEL MEASUREMENT; SOUND PRESSURE;

EID: 0029951305     PISSN: 01050397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/01050399609074958     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Amassian VE, Cracco RQ, Maccabee PJ. Focal stimulation of human cerebral cortex with the magnetic coil: a comparison with electrical stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1989; 74: 401-16.
2. Barker AT. An introduction to the basic principles of magnetic nerve stimulation. J Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 81: 26-37.
3. Barker AT, Jalinous R. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. The Lancet 1985; I: 1106-7.
4. Berardelli A, Inghilleri M, Cruccu G, Mercuri B, Manfredi M. Electrical and magnetic transcranial stimulation in patients with corticospinal damage due to stroke or motor neurone disease. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 81: 389-96.
5. Boniface SJ, Mills KR, Schubert M. Responses of single spinal motoneurons to magnetic brain stimulation in healthy subjects and patients with multiple sclerosis. Brain 1991; 114: 643-62.
6. Britton TC, Thomson PD, Rothwell JC, Findley LJ, Marsden CD. Modulation of postural wrist tremors by magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in patients with Parkinson's disease or essential tremor and in normal subjects mimicking tremor. Ann Neurol 1993; 33: 473-9.
7. Council directive 89/391/EEC, Council directive on the minimum safety and health requirements for the workplace, Luxemburg 1989.
8. Council directive 89/392/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the member states relating to machinery. Luxemburg 1989.
9. Counter SA. Neurobiological effects of extensive transcranial electromagnetic stimulation in an animal model. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993; 89: 341-8.
10. Counter SA, Borg E. Analysis of the coil generated impulse noise in extracranial magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1992; 85: 280-8.
11. Counter SA, Borg E, Löfqvist L, Brismar T. Hearing loss from the acoustic artifact of the coil used in extracranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 1990; 40: 1159-62.
12. Counter SA, Borg E, Löfqvist L. Acoustic trauma in extracranial magnetic brain stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 78: 173-84.
13. Gates JR, Dhuna A, Pascual-Leone A. Lack of pathologic changes in human temporal lobes after transcranial magnetic stimulation. Epilepsia 1992; 33: 504-8.
14. IEC 651. Sound Level Meters. International Electrotechnical Commission. Geneva 1979.
15. Mills KR, Boniface SJ, Schubert M. The firing probability of single motor units following transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects and patients with neurological disease. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 43: 100-10.
16. Murray NMF Magnetic stimulation of cortex: clinical applications. J Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 8: 66-76.
17. Rimpiläinen I, Karma P, Laranne J, Eskola H, Hakkinen V. Magnetic facial nerve stimulation in Bell's palsy. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1992; 112: 311-6.
18. Rimpiläinen I. The origin of facial long latency responses elicited with magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 93: 121-30.
19. Rothwell JC. Long latency reflexes of human arm muscles in health and disease. New Trends Adv Tech Clin Neurophysiol (EEG Suppl. 41) 1990; 41: 251-63.
20. TLV's Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices for 1992-3. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. 116pp. Cincinnati 1992.