The extension and application of molecular similarity calculations to drug design

Drug Information Journal

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 371-388

  Good, Andrew C ^a,c   Richards, W Graham ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Physical Laboratory   (United Kingdom)

^c NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Electrostatics; Pharmacophore; QSAR; Shape; Similarity

Indexed keywords

DRUG CARRIER;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; DRUG DESIGN; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 0029949325     PISSN: 00928615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/009286159603000206     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Martin YC. 3D Database Searching in Drug Design. J Med Chem. 1992;35:2145-2154.
2. Kuntz ID. Structure Based Strategies for Drug Design and Discovery. Science. 1992;257:1078-1082.
3. Cramer RD III, Patterson DE, Bunce JD. Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA). Effect of Shape on Binding of Steroids to Carrier Proteins. J Am Chem Soc. 1988;110:5959-5967.
4. Mcfarland JW. Comparative Molecular Field Analysis of Antococcidial Triazines. J Med Chem. 1992;35:2543-2550.
5. Hodgkin EE, Richards WG. Molecular Similarity Based on Electrostatic Potential and Electric Field. Int J Quantum Chem Quantum Biol Symp. 1987;14:105-110.
6. Dean PM, Callow P, Chau P-L. Molecular Recognition: Blind Searching for Regions of Strong Structural Match on the Surfaces of Two Dissimilar Molecules. J Mol Graph. 1988;6:28-34.
7. Burt C, Richards WG. Molecular Similarity: The Introduction of Flexible Fitting. J Comput-Aided Mol Design. 1990;4:231-238.
8. Blaney FE, Finn P, Phippen R, Wyatt M. Molecular Surface Comparison: Application to Molecular Design. J Mol Graph. 1993;11:98-105.
9. Manaut M, Sanz F, Jose J, Milesi M. Automatic Search for Maximum Similarity Between MEP Distributions. J Comput-Aided Mol Design. 1991;5:371-380.
10. Moon JB, Howe WJ. 3D Database Searching and De Novo Design Construction Methods in Molecular Design. Tetrahedron Comput Methodol. 1992;3:697-711.
11. van Geerestein VJ, Perry NJ, Grootenhuis PDJ, Haasnoot CAG. 3D Database Searching on the Basis of Shape Using the SPERM Prototype Method. Tetrahedron Comput Methodol. 1992;3:595-613.
12. Nilakantan R, Bauman N, Venkataraghavan R. New Method for Rapid Characterization of Molecular Shapes: Applications in Drug Design. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 1993;33:79-85.
13. Hopfinger AJ. A QSAR Investigation of DHFR Inhibition by Bakers Triazines Based Upon Molecular Shape Analysis. J Am Chem Soc. 1980;102:7196-7206.
14. Hopfinger AJ. Theory and Analysis of Molecular Potential Energy Fields in Molecular Shape Analysis: A QSAR Study of 2,4-diamino-5-benzylpyrimidines as DHFR Inhibitors. J Med Chem. 1983;26:990-996.
15. Burt C, Huxley P, Richards, WG. The Application of Molecular Similarity Calculations. J Comp Chem. 1990;11:1139-1146.
16. Seri-Levy A, Richards WG. Chiral Drug Potency: Pfeiffers Rule and Computed Chirality Coefficients. Tetrahedron Asymmetry. 1993;4:1917-1921.
17. Carbo R, Leyda L, Arnau M. An Electron Density Measure of the Similarity Between Two Compounds. Int J Quantum Chem. 1980;17:1185-1189.
18. Richard AM. Quantitative Comparison of Molecular Electrostatic Potentials for Structure Activity Studies. J Comp Chem. 1991;12:959-969.
19. Meyer AM, Richards WG. Similarity of Molecular Shape. J Comput-Aided Mol Design. 1991;5:426-439.
20. Oxford Molecular Ltd., The Magdalen Centre, Oxford Science Park, Sandford on Thames, Oxford OX4 4GA, United Kingdom.
21. Good AC. The Calculation of Molecular Similarity: Alternative Formulas, Data Manipulation and Graphical Display. J Mol Graph. 1992;10:144-151.
22. Reynolds CA, Burt C, Richards WG. A Linear Molecular Similarity Index. Quant Struct-Act Relat. 1992;11:34-35.
23. Seeman P, Grigoriadis D. Dopamine Receptors in Brain and Periphery. Neurochem Int. 1987;10:1-25.
24. Allen FN, Kennard O, Taylor R. Systematic Analysis of Structural Data as a Research Technique in Organic Chemistry. Acc Chem Res. 1983:146-153.
25. SYBYL, Tripos Associates Inc, 1699 S. Hanley Rd., Suite 303, St Louis, Missouri 63144.
26. Stewart JJ. MOPAC: A Semi Empirical Molecular Orbital Program. J Comput-Aided Mol Design. 1990;4:1-105.
27. Ferenzcy G, Reynolds CA, Richards WG. Semi Empirical AMI Electrostatic Potential and AMI Electrostatic Potential Derived Charges, a Comparison with Ab Initio Values. J Comp Chem. 1990;11:159-166.
28. Manallack, D, Beart PM. A Three Dimensional Receptor Model of the Dopamine D2 Receptor from Computer Graphic Analyses of D2 Agonists. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1988;40:422-428.
29. Liljefors T, Wikstrom H. A Molecular Mechanics Approach to the Understanding of Presynaptic Selectivity for Centrally Acting Dopamine Receptor Agonists of the Phenylpiperidine Series. J Med Chem. 1986;29:1896-1904.
30. de Vries DJ, Beart PM. Role of Assay Conditions in Determining Agonist Potency at D2 Dopamine Receptor in Stratial Homogenates. Mol Brain Res. 1986;1:29-35.
31. Anderson PH, Jansen JA. Dopamine Receptor Agonists: Selectivity and Dopamine Receptor Efficacy. European J. Pharmac. 1990;188:335-347.
32. Good AC, Hodgkin EE, Richards WG. The Utilization of Gaussian Functions for the Rapid Evaluation of Molecular Similarity. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 1992;32:188-191.
33. Good AC, Richards WG. Rapid Evaluation of Shape Similarity Using Gaussian Functions. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 1993;33:112-116.
34. Szabo A, Ostland NS. Modern Quantum Chemistry. New York: McGraw Hill; 1982; pp. 410-412.
35. Gill PE, Murray W. Algorithms for the Solution of Non-linear Least Squares Problems. J Numer Anal. 1978;15:977-992.
36. NAG libraries, Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd, Oxford, United Kingdom.
37. CHEM-X, Chemical Design Ltd., Roundway House, Cromwell Business Park, Chipping Norton, Oxon, OX7 5SR, United Kingdom.
38. Hodgkin EE, Richards WG. A Semi-Empirical Method for Calculating Molecular Similarity. J Chem Soc Chem Commun. 1986;1342-1344.
39. Gaussian 88. Frisch MJ, Head GM, Schlegel HB, Raghavachari K, Binkley JS, Gonzalez C, et al. Pittsburgh, PA: Gaussian. Inc.; 1988.
40. Good AC, So S, Richards WG. Structure Activity Relationships from Similarity Matrices. J Med Chem. 1993;36:433-438.
41. Good AC, Peterson SJ, Richards WG. QSARs from Similarity Matrices. Technique Validation and Application in the Comparison of Different Similarity Evaluation Methods. J Med Chem. 1993;36:2929-2937.
42. Geladi P, Kowalski BR. PLS Regression: A Tutorial. Analytica Chimica Acta. 1986;185:1-17.
43. Livingstone DJ, Hesketh G, Clayworth D. Novel Method for the Display of Multivariate Data Using Neural Networks. J Mol Graph. 1991;9:115-118.
44. Allen, MS, Tan Y, Trudell ML, Narayanan K, Schindler LR, Martin MJ, et al. Synthetic and Computer Assisted Analysis of the Pharmacophore for the Benzodiazepine Receptor Inverse Agonist Site. J Med Chem. 1990;33:2343-2357.
45. Carroll FI, Gao Y, Rahman MA, Abraham P, Parham K, Lewin AH, Boja JW, Kuhar MJ. Synthesis, Ligand Binding, QSAR and CoMFA Study of 3β-(p-substituted phenyl)tropane-2/3carboxylic acid methyl esters. J Med Chem. 1991;34:2719-2725.
46. Maret GM, Tayar NE, Carrupt PA, Testa B, Jenner P, Baird M. Toxication of MPTP and Analogues by Monoamine Oxidase. Biochem Pharm. 1990;40:783-792.
47. Baroni M, Constantino G, Cruciani G, Riganelli D, Valigi R, Clementi S. GOLPE: An Advanced Chemometric Tool for 3D QSAR Problems. Quant Struct Act Relat. 1993;12:9-20.
48. Mitchell TJ. An Algorithm for the Construction of D-Optimal Experimental Designs. Technometrics. 1974;16:203-210.
49. Box GEP, Hunter WG, Hunter JS. Statistics for Experimenters. New York: 1978; Willey J. & Sons; chapter 12.