Morphological comparison of mitral and aortic bioprostheses explanted from the same patient for primary tissue failure

Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 291-294

  Pansini, S ^a,b   Di Summa, M ^a   Galloni, M ^a   Gagliardotto, P ^a   Parisi, F ^a   Zattera, G ^a   Punta, G ^a   Girotto, M ^a   Cesarani, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^b Regina Margherita Sant'Anna   (Italy)

Author keywords

Porcine bioprosthesis; Tissue failure

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANIMAL TISSUE; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; ARTICLE; CALCIFICATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; HUMAN; MALE; MITRAL VALVE PROSTHESIS; MORPHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PANNUS; PHOTOGRAPHY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; STENT; SWINE; VALVULAR HEART DISEASE; X RAY FILM;

AORTIC VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; CALCINOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MITRAL VALVE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION;

EID: 0029944043     PISSN: 00219509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Pansini S, Ottino GM, Galloni M, Forsennati PG, Serpieri G, Morea M. Morphological comparison of primary tissue failure in porcine mitral and aortic bioprostheses in the same patient Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg 1990;4 431-4
2. Milano A, Bortolotti U, Talenti E et al Calcific degeneration as the main cause of porcine bioprosthetic valve failure. Am J Cardiol 1984,53:1066-70.
3. Schoen FJ, Kujovich IL, Levy RJ. Bioprosthetic valve failure. Cardiovasc Clin 1988,18(2):289-317.
4. Burdon TA, Miller DC, Oyer PE et al Durability of porcine valves at fifteen years in a representative North American patient population. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;103 238-51.
5. Pansini S, Ottino GM, Galloni M et al Primary tissue failure in porcine bioprostheses: risk factors evaluated with clinical and morphological studies. In: Bodnar E, editors Surgery for heart valve disease. London. ICR, 1990:435-42
6. Pansini S, Ottino GM, Caimmi F, Del Ponte S, Morea M. Risk factors of primary tissue failure within the 11th postoperative year in 217 patients with porcine bioprostheses. J Card Surg 1991;6(4 Suppl):644-8
7. Jamieson WRE, Rosado LJ, Munro AI et al Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis primary tissue failure (structural valve deterioration) by age groups Ann Thorac Surg 1988;46: 155-62
8. Louagie Y, Noirhomme P, Aranguis E et al. Use of the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis: assessement of a patient selection policy J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992,104 1013-24.
9. Bortolotti U, Milano A, Thiene G et al Long term durability of Hancock porcine bioprosthesis following combined mitral and aortic valve replacement: an 11 years experience. Ann Thorac Surg 1987,44:139-44.
10. Cipriano PR, Billingham ME, Miller DC. Calcification of aortic versus mitral porcine bioprosthetic heart valves: a radiographic study comparing amounts of calcific deposits in valves explanted from the same patient. Am J Cardiol 1984,54:1030-2.
11. Warnes CA, Scott ML, Silver GM, Smith CW, Ferrans VJ, Roberts WC. Comparison of late degenerative changes in porcine bioprostheses in mitral and aortic valve position in the same patient Am J Cardiol 1983,51:965-8.
12. Broom ND. Fatigue induced damage in glutaraldehyde preserved heart valve tissue J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1978,76:202-11
13. Thubrikar MJ, Deck JD, Aouad J, Nolan SP. Role of mechanical stress in calcification of aortic bioprosthetic valves J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983,86:115-25.