Differentiation of breast lesions by measurements under craniocaudal and lateromedial compression using a new sonographic method

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 1996, Pages 401-414

  Richter, Kari ^a   Willrodt, Ruth Gesa ^b   Opri, Firu ^b   Heywang Köbrunner, Sylvia H ^c  

^a Vivantes Auguste Viktoria Klinikum   (Germany)

^b CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^c MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

breast lesions; craniocaudal lateromedial compression; quantitative parameters; sound amplitude velocity; Ultrasound sonography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST TUMOR; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND TRANSMISSION;

EID: 0029942980     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199607000-00003     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Shapiro S. Periodic breast cancer screening in seven foreign countries. Cancer 1992;69:1919-1924.
2. Feig SA. Breast masses: Mammographic and sonographic evaluation. Radiol Clin North Am 1992;30:67-92.
3. Sickles EA. Practical solutions to common mammographic problems: Tailoring the examination. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;151:31-39.
4. Sickles EA. Imaging techniques other than mammography for detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. In: Brümer S, Langfeldt B, eds. Recent results in cancer research: Advances in breast cancer detection. Berlin: Springer, 1990.
5. Schwartz GF, Carter DL, Conant EF, et al. Mammographically detected breast cancer. Cancer 1994;73:1660-1665.
6. Leucht W. Lehratlas der mammasonografie. Stuttgart: Thieme, 1989.
7. Jackson VP. The role of US in breast imaging. Radiology 1990;177:305-311.
8. Basset LW, Kimme-Smith C, Sutherland LK, et al. Automated and hand held breast US: Effect on patient management. Radiology 1987;65:103-108.
9. Jellins J, Kossof G, Reve TS. Detection and classification of liquid-filled masses in breast by grey scale echography. Radiology 1977;125:205-212.
10. Fornage BD, Sneige N, Faroux MJ, Andry E. Sonographic appearance and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of breast carcinoma smaller than 1 cm. J Ultrasound Med 1990;9: 559-568.
11. Adler DD, Hyde DL, Ikeda DM. Quantitative sonographic parameters as a means of distinguishing breast cancers from benign solid breast masses. J Ultrasound Med 1991;10:505-508.
12. Fornage BD, Lorigan JG, Andry E. Fibroadenoma of the breast: Sonographic appearance. Radiology 1989;172:671-675.
13. Richter K. Technique for detecting and evaluating breast lesions. J Ultrasound Med 1994;13:797-802.
14. Richter K, Roßdeutscher W, Hasenpusch M. A new sonographic method for detecting breast lesions-screening for breast cancer possible? In: Madjar H, Teubner J, eds. Breast ultrasound update. Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on the Ultrasonic Examination of the Breast. Basel: Karger, 1995.
15. Richter K. Clinical Amplitude/velocity reconstructive imaging (CARI): A new sonographic method for detecting breast lesions. BJR 1995;68:375-384.
16. Richter K. Detection of diffuse breast cancers with a new sonographic method. J Clin Ultrasound. 1996;24:157-168.
17. Richter K, Heywang-Köbrunner SH. Simple indirect in vivo measurement of relative velocity for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:825-831.
18. Richter K, Heywang-Köbrunner SH. Quantitative parameters measured by a new sonographic method for differentiation of benign and malignant breast disease. Invest Radiol. 1995;30: 401-411.
19. Harms V. Biomathematik, Statistik, und dokumentation. Kiel-Mönkeberg, Germany: Harms, 1988.
20. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, et al. Solid breast nodules: Use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995;196:123-134.