Iohexol vs. ioxaglate in lower extremity angiography: A comparitive randomized double-blind study in 80 patients

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 133-135

  Krouwels, M M ^a   Overbosch, E H ^a   Guit, G L ^a  

^a Kennemer Gasthuis ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Angiography, contrast media; Contrast media, efficacy study

Indexed keywords

IOHEXOL; IOXAGLIC ACID;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTERIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM FUNCTION DISORDER; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HEAT; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; LEG; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; THROMBOEMBOLISM;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST MEDIA; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; IOHEXOL; IOXAGLIC ACID; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NAUSEA; PAIN; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES; TIME FACTORS; VOMITING;

EID: 0029939612     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0720-048X(96)00736-X     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K. Adverse reactions to ionic and non-ionic contrast media: a report from the Japanese Committee on the safety of contrast media. Radiology 1990; 175: 621-628.
2. Caro JJ, Trindade E, McGregor M. The risk of death and of severe non-fatal reactions with high- vs. low-osmolality contrast media: a meta-analysis. AJR 1991; 156: 825-832.
3. Lasser EC, Berry CC. Non-ionic vs. ionic contrast media: what do the data tell us? AJR 1989; 152: 945-946.
4. Morris TW. X-ray conrast media: where are we now, and where are we going? Radiology 1993; 188: 11-16.
5. Manhire AR, Dawson P, Dennet R. Contrast agent-induced emesis. Clin Radiol 1984; 35: 369-370.
6. Thron A, Ratzka M, Voigt K, Nadjmi M. Iohexol and ioxaglate in cerebral angiography. In: Taenzer and Zeitler, editors. Contrast media in urography, angiography and computerized tomography. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag, 1983; 115-119.
7. Vacek JL, Gersema L, Woods M et al. Frequencies of reactions to iohexol versus ioxaglate. Am J Cardiol 1990; 66: 1277-1278.
8. Fareed J, Walenga JM, Saravia GE, Moncada RM. Thrombogenic potential of non-ionic contrast media? Radiology 1990; 174: 321-325.
9. Hill JA, Grabowski EF. Comprehensive review: Relationship of anticoagulation and radiographic contrast agents to thombosis during coronair angiography and angioplasty: Are there real concerns? Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 1992; 25: 200-208.
10. Hardeman MR, Konijnenberg A, Sturk A, Reekers JA. Activation of platelets by low-osmolar contrast media: differential effects of ionic and non-ionic agents. Radiology 1994; 192: 563-566.