MK-801 protects conditioned responses from extinction in the rabbit nictitating membrane preparation

Psychobiology

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 127-135

  Kehoe, E James ^a   Macrae, Michaela ^a   Hutchlnson, Catherine L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIZOCILPINE; N METHYL DEXTRO ASPARTIC ACID RECEPTOR; N METHYL DEXTRO ASPARTIC ACID RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; MALE; NICTITATING MEMBRANE; NONHUMAN; PSYCHOBIOLOGY; RABBIT; REINFORCEMENT; TRAINING;

EID: 0029934977     PISSN: 08896313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. CEGAVSKE, C. F., HARRISON, T. A., & TORIGOE, Y. (1987). Identification of the Substrates of the unconditioned response in the classically conditioned, rabbit, nictitating-membrane preparation. In I. Gormezano, W. F. Prokasy, & R. F. Thompson (Eds.), Classical conditioning (pp. 65-91). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. CHAPMAN, P. F., STEINMETZ, J. E., & THOMPSON, R. F. (1988). Classical conditioning does not occur when direct stimulation of the red nucleus or cerebellar nuclei is the unconditioned stimulus. Brain Research, 442, 97-104.
3. COLEMAN, S. R., & GORMEZANO, I. (1971). Classical conditioning of the rabbit's (Oryctolagus cuniculus) nictitating membrane response under symmetrical CS-US interval shifts. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 77, 447-455.
4. COLLINGRIDGE, G. L., KEHL, S. J., & MCLENNAN, H. (1983). Excitatory amino acids in synaptic transmission in the Schaffer collateral- commissural pathway of the rat hippocampus. Journal of Physiology, 334, 33-46.
5. COTMAN, C. W., & IVERSEN, L. L. (1987). Excitatory amino acids in the brain - Focus on NMDA receptors. Trends in Neurosciences, 10, 263-265.
6. Cox, J., GUTHRIE, R., MACRAE, M., & KEHOE, E. J. (1994). MK801 impairs acquisition and expression of conditioned responses in the rabbit nictitating membrane preparation. Psychobiology, 22, 156-166.
7. Cox, J., & WESTBROOK, R. F. (1994). The NMDA receptor anatagonist MK-801 blocks acquisition and extinction of conditioned hypoalgesic responses in the rat. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47B, 187-210.
8. DENNY, M. R. (1994). State-dependent learning. In R. J. Corsini (Ed.), Encylopedia of psychology (p. 464). New York: Wiley.
9. FALLS, W. A., MISERENDINO, M. J. D., & DAVIS, M. (1992). Extinction of fear-potentiated startle: Blockade by infusion of an NMDA anatagonist into the amygdala. Journal of Neuroscience, 12, 854-863.
10. GILBERT, M. E., & MACK, C. M. (1990). The NMDA antagonist MK-801 suppresses long-term potentiation, kindling and kindling-induced potentiation in the perforant path of the unanesthetized rat. Brain Research, 519, 89-96.
11. GLUCK, M. A., & MYERS, C. E. (1995). Representation and association in memory: A neurocomputational view of hippocampal function. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 23-29.
12. GORMEZANO, I. (1966). Classical conditioning. In J. B. Sidowski (Ed.), Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology (pp. 385-420). New York: McGraw-Hill.
13. GORMEZANO, I., & GIBBS, C. M. (1988). Transduction of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 18-21.
14. GORMEZANO, I., & HARVEY, J. A. (1980). Sensory and associative effects of LSD in classical conditioning of rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) nictitating membrane response. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 94, 641-649.
15. GRANT, N. (1994). Transfer between CSs differing in CS-US interval and/or modality in the rabbit nictitating membrane preparation: Test of a real-time model. Honours thesis, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
16. HARVEY, J. A., & GORMEZANO, I. (1981). Effects of haloperidol and pimozide on classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response. Journal of Pharmacology & Experimental Therapy, 221, 289-294.
17. HARVEY, J. A., GORMEZANO, I., & COOL-HAUSER, V. A. (1983). Effects of scopolamine and methylscopolamine on classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 9, 330.
18. HINSON, R. E. (1982). Effects of UCS preexposure on excitatory and inhibitory rabbit eyelid conditioning: An associative effects of conditioned contextual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 8, 49-61.
19. HITCHCOCK, J. M., & DAVIS, M. (1986). Lesions of the amygdala, but not the cerebellum or red nucleus, block conditioned fear as measured by the potentiated startle paradigm. Behavioral Neuroscience, 100, 11-22.
20. KEITH, J. R., & RUDY, J. W. (1990). Why NMDA-receptor-dependent long-term potentiation may not be a mechanism of learning and memory: Reappraisal of the NMDA-receptor blockade strategy. Psychobiology, 18, 251-257.
21. KEMP, J. A., FOSTER, A. C., & WONG, E. H. F. (1987). Non-competitive antagonists of excitatory amino acid receptors. Trends in Neurosciences, 10, 294-298.
22. KIM, M., CAMPEAU, S., FALLS, W. A., & DAVIS, M. (1993). Infusion of the non-NMDA receptor antagonist CNQX into the amygdala blocks the expression of fear-potentiated startle. Behavioral & Neural Biology, 59, 5-8.
23. LUBOW, R. E., & WEINER, I. (1981). Conditioned attention theory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 1-49). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
24. LYNCH, M. A., ERRINGTON, M. L., CLEMENTS, M. P., BLISS, T. V. P., REDINI-DEL NEGRO, C., & LAROCHE, S. (1990). Increases in glutamate release and phosphoinositide metabolism associated with longterm potentiation and classical conditioning. Progress in Brain Research, 83, 251-256.
25. MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variation in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298.
26. MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1977). Stimulus control: Attentional factors. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 481-513). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
27. MACRAE, M., & KEHOE, E. J. (1995). Transfer between conditional and discrete discriminations in conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response. Learning & Motivation, 26, 380-402.
28. MARSHALL-GOODELL, B., SCHREURS, B. G., & GORMEZANO, I. (1982). Ruler vs. the Apple II/FIRST system analysis of analog signals in classical conditioning. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 14,519-525.
29. MISERENDINO, M. J., & DAVIS, M. (1993). NMDA and non-NMDA antagonists infused into the nucleus reticularis pontis caudalis depress the acoustic startle reflex. Brain Research, 623, 215-222.
30. MISERENDINO, M. J. D., SANANES, C. B., MELIA, K. R., & DAVIS, M. (1990). Blocking of acquisition but not expression of conditioned fear-potentiated startle by NMDA anatagonists in the amygdala. Nature, 345, 716-718.
31. MORRIS, R. G. M., DAVIS, S., & BUTCHER, S. P. (1990). Hippocampal synaptic plasticity and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors: A role in information storage. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 329, 187-204.
32. MULLER, D., JOLY, M., & LYNCH, G. (1988, December 23). Contributions of quisqualate and NMDA receptors to the induction and expression of LTP. Science, 242, 1694-1697.
33. NAPIER, R. M., MACRAE, M., & KEHOE, E. J. (1992). Rapid reacquisition in conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 182-192.
34. OVERTON, D. A. (1964). State dependent or "dissociated" learning produced with pentobarbital. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 51, 3-12.
35. PEARCE, J. M., & HALL, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532-552.
36. PERRETT, S. P., & MAUK, M. D. (1995). Extinction of conditioned eyelid responses requires the anterior lobe of the cerebellar cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 15(3, Pt. 1), 2074-2080.
37. ROBINSON, G. B. ( 1993). MK801 retards acquisition of a classically conditioned response without affecting conditioning-related alterations in perforant path-granule cell synaptic transmission. Psychobiology, 21, 253-264.
38. ROBINSON, G. B., PORT, R. L., & STILLWELL, E. (1993). Latent inhibition of the classically conditioned rabbit nictitating membrane response is unaffected by the NMDA antagonist MK.801. Psychobiology, 21,120-124.
39. ROSENFIELD, M. E., DAVYDAITIs, A., & MOORE, J. W. (1985). Brachium conjunctivum and rubrobulbar tract: Brainstem projections of red nucleus essential for the conditioned nictitating membrane response. Physiology & Behavior, 34, 751-759.
40. ROSENFIELD, M. E., & MOORE, J. W. (1995). Connections in cerebellar cortex (Larsell's HVI) in the rabbit: A WGA-HRP study with implications for classical eyeblink conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 109, 1106-1118.
41. SCANDRETT, J., & GORMEZANO, I. (1980). Microprocessor control and A/D data acquisition in classical conditioning. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 12, 120-125.
42. SCHINDLER, C. W., GORMEZANO, I., & HARVEY, J. A. (1984). Sensory and associative effects of morphine and naloxone in classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response. Psychopharmacology, 83, 114-121.
43. SCHMAJUK, N. A., & MOORE, J. W. (1988). The hippocampus and the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response: A real-time attentional-associative model. Psychobiology, 16, 20-35.
44. SOLOMON, P. R. (1987). Neural and behavioral mechanism involved in learning to ignore irrelevant stimuli. In I. Gormezano,W. F. Prokasy, & R. F. Thompson (Eds.), Classical conditioning (pp. 117-159). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. SUTTON, R. S., & BARTO, A. G. (1990). Time-derivative models of Pavlovian reinforcement. In M. Gabriel & J. W. Moore (Eds.), Learning and computational neuroscience (pp. 497-537). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. THOMPSON, R. F. (1986, August 29). The neurobiology of learning and memory. Science, 233, 941-947.
47. THOMPSON, R. F. (1990). Neural mechanisms of classical conditioning in mammals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 329, 161-170.