Re-evaluation of the concept that high cell concentrations "protect" cells in vitro from ultrasonically induced lysis

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 497-514

  Brayman, A A ^a   Church, C C ^b   Miller, M W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b Acusphere Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell concentration Cell volume fraction; Hematocrit; Ultrasonic cell lysis

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MEMBRANES; BLOOD; BUBBLES (IN FLUIDS); CELLS; LIVING SYSTEMS STUDIES; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; VOLUME FRACTION;

CELL AGGREGATES; HEMATOCRIT; HIGH CELL CONCENTRATIONS; MICROBUBBLES; SONOLYSIS; ULTRASONICALLY INDUCED CELL LYSIS;

ULTRASONIC EFFECTS;

ARTICLE; CELL AGGREGATION; CELL DENSITY; CELL PROTECTION; CYTOLYSIS; HEMATOCRIT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ULTRASOUND THERAPY;

EID: 0029933883     PISSN: 03015629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(95)02078-0     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Azadniv M. Effect of extremely low frequency electric fields on growth of mammalian cells in vitro. Ph.D. Thesis, State University of New York, Syracuse, NY, USA, 1992.
2. Blackshear PL, Blackshear GL. Mechanical hemolysis. In: Skalak R, Chien S, eds. Handbook of bioengineering. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1987:15.1-15.19.
3. Brayman AA, Azadniv M, Chen X, Miller MW. Bubble recycling and ultrasonic cell lysis in a stationary exposure vessel. J Acoust Soc Am 1994;96:627-633.
4. Brayman AA, Doida Y, Miller MW. Apparent contribution of respiratory gas exchange to the in vitro "cell density effect" in ultrasonic cell lysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 1992; 18:701-714.
5. Brayman AA, Miller MW. Cell density dependence of the ultrasonic degassing of fixed erythrocyte suspensions. Ultrasound Med Biol 1993; 19:243-252.
6. Carstensen EL, Kelly P, Church CC, et al. Lysis of erythrocytes by exposure to CW ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1993; 19:147-165.
7. Church CC, Flynn HG, Miller MW, Sacks PG. The exposure vessel as a factor in ultrasonically-induced mammalian cell lysis. II. An explanation of the need to rotate exposure tubes. Ultrasound Med Biol 1982; 8:299-309.
8. Church CC. Bubble dynamics and bubble-cell interactions induced by an acoustic traveling wave. Ultrasound Med Biol 1996; (in press).
9. Coakley WT, Nyborg WL. Cavitation; dynamics of gas bubbles; applications. In: Fry F, ed. Ultrasound: Its applications in medicine and biology. New York: Elsevier Science Inc., 1978:77-159.
10. Ellwart JW, Brettel H, Kober LO. Cell membrane damage by ultrasound at different cell concentrations. Ultrasound Med Biol 1988; 14:43-50.
11. Flynn HG, Church CC. Transient pulsations of small gas bubbles in water. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 84:985-998.
12. Miller DL. The influence of hematocrit on hemolysis by ultrasonically activated gas-filled micropores. Ultrasound Med Biol 1988; 14:293-297.
13. Miller DL, Williams AR. Bubble cycling as the explanation of the promotion of ultrasonic cavitation in a rotating tube exposure system. Ultrasound Med Biol 1989; 15:641-648.
14. Miller MW, Azadniv M, Doida Y, Brayman AA. Effect of a stabilized microbubble contrast agent on CW ultrasound-induced red blood cell lysis in vitro. Echocardiography 1995; 12:1-11.
15. Nyborg WL. Radiation pressure on a small rigid sphere. J Acoust Soc Am 1967;42:947-952.
16. Nyborg WL, Miller DL. Biophysical implications of bubble mechanics. Appl Sci Res 1982; 38:17-24.
17. Prosperetti A. Thermal effects and damping mechanisms in the forced radial oscillations of gas bubbles in liquids. J Acoust Soc Am 1977;61:17-27.
18. Saad AH. Some biological effects of ultrasound. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Manchester, Manchester, England, 1983.
19. Veress E, Vince J. The haemolysing action of ultrasound on erythrocytes. Acustica 1977; 36:100-103.
20. Williams AR. Ultrasound: Biological effects and potential hazards. New York: Academic Press, 1983.