Response surface models to describe the effects of temperature, pH, and ethanol concentration on growth kinetics and fermentation end products of a Pectinatus sp.

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 1233-1237

  Watier, D ^a   Dubourguier, H C ^a,b   Leguerinel, I ^a,c   Hornez, J P ^a  

^a UNIV LILLE   (France)

^b Lab de Chim Organique et E Ecl des Hautes Etudes Industrielles   (France)

^c IUT Département de Biologie   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID; ALCOHOL; GLUCOSE; PROPIONIC ACID;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; CELL DENSITY; FERMENTATION; GRAM NEGATIVE ANAEROBIC BACTERIA; GROWTH CURVE; GROWTH RATE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONHUMAN; PH; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 0029932805     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/aem.62.4.1233-1237.1996     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Back, W., N. Weiss, and H. Seidel. 1979. Isolierung und systematische Zuordnung bierschadlicher gramnegativer Bakterien. II Gramnegative anaerobe Stabchen/Anhang: Aus Bier isolierte gramnegative fakuitativ Stäbchen. Brauwissenschaft 32:233-238.
2. Buchanan, R. L., L. K. Bagi, R. V. Goins, and J. G. Phillips. 1993 Response surface models for the growth kinetics of Escherichia coli O157:H7 Food Microbiol. 10:303-315.
3. Buchanan, R. L., J. L. Smith, C. Mccolgan, B. S. Marmer, M. Golden, and B. Dell. 1993. Response surface models for the effects of temperature, pH. sodium chloride and sodium nitrite on the aerobic and anaerobic growth of Staphylococcus aureus 196E. J. Food Safety 13:159-175
4. Davey, K. 1989. Comparison of the Schoolfiel (non linear Arrhenius) model for predicting bacterial growth in foods. A reply to Adair et al. Food Microbiol 6:302-303.
5. Gibson, A. M., N. Bratchell, and T. A. Roberts. 1988. Predicting microbial growth responses of Salmonellae in a laboratory medium as affected by pH sodium chloride and storage temperature Int J. Food Microbiol. 6:155-178
6. Gompertz, B. 1825. On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the values of life contingencies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc London 115:513-585
7. Haïkara, A., T.-M. Enari, and K. Lounatmaa. 1981. The genus Pectinatus. a new group of anaerobic beer spoilage bacteria. Eur. Brewery Conv Proc. Int. Congr 24:229-240.
8. Haukeli, A. D. 1980. En ny ølskadelig bakterie i tappet øl. Referat frân det 18. Skan dinaviska Bryggeritekniska Mötet. Stockholm, p. 112-122
9. Hsu, S. T., and S. T. Yet. 1991. Propionic acid fermentation of lactose by Propiombacterium acidipropionici effects of pH. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 38:571-578
10. Kirchner, G., R. Lurz, and K. Matsuzawa. 1980. Biertrübungen durch Bakterien der Gattung Bacteroides. Monatsschr. Brauwissenschaft. 33:461-467
11. Lee, S. Y., M. S. Mabee, and N. O. Jangaard. 1478 Pectinatus. a new genus of the family Bacteroidaceae. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 28:582-594.
12. Membré, J. M., and P. M. Burlot. 1994. Effects of temperature, pH, and NaCl on growth and pectinolytic activity of Pseudomonas marginalis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60:2017-2022.
13. Membré, J. M., and J. L. Tholozan. 1994. Modeling growth and off-flavours production of spoiled beer bacteria, Pectinatus frisingensis. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 77:456-460.
14. Pirt, S. J. 1974 Effects of temperature, p. 137-140. In Principles of microbe and cell cultivation. Blackwell Scientific Publications Ltd., Oxford.
15. Ratkowsky, D. A., J. Olley, T. A. McMeekin, and A. Ball. 1982. Relationship between temperature and growth rate of bacterial cultures. J. Bacteriol. 149: 1-5.
16. Ratkowsky, D., T. Ross, T. McMeekin, and J. Olley. 1991. Comparison of Ahrrenius-type and Belehrek-type models for predicting bacterial growth in foods. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 71:452-459.
17. Richards, F. J. 1959 A flexible growth function for empirical use J. Exp. Bot. 10:290-300
18. Ricker, W. E. 1979. Growth rates and models. Fish Physiol. 8:677-743.
19. Schnute, J. 1981. A versatile growth model with statistically stable parameters Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci. 38:1128-1140.
20. Seidel, H. 1989. Pectinatus und etere morphologisch ähnliche gram-negative. anaerobe stabchen aus dem Brauereibereich. Monatsschrift Brau. 11:428-429
21. Shoolfiels, R., P. Sharpe, and C. Magnuson. 1981. Nonlinear regression of biological temperature-dependent rate models based on absolute reaction rate theory. J Theor. Biol. 88:719-731.
22. Skinner, G. E., J. W. Larkin, and E. J. Rhodehamel. 1994. Mathematical modeling of microbial growth a review. J. Food Safety 14:175-217.
23. Soberka, R., D. Sciazko, and A. Warzecha, 1989. Pectinatus, nouvelle bactérie pouvant affecter la stabilité biologique du moût et de la bière. Bios 20: 51-59.
24. Stannard, C. J., A. P. Williams, and P. A. Gibbs. 1985. Temperature/growth relationship for psychotrophic food-spoilage bacteria. Food Microbiol. 2: 115-122.
25. Takahashi, N. 1983 Presumed Pectinatus strain isolated from Japanese beer. Bull. Brew Sci. 28:11-14.
26. Tholozan, J. L., G. Delattre, J. P. Grivet, and M. Kubaczka. 1993. Succinate pathway from glucose to propionate in Pectinatus frisingensis metabolism, a strictly anaerobic bacterium. Meded. Fac Landbouwwet. Univ. Gent 58/4b: 1891-1893.
27. Watier, D., I. Leguerinel, J. P. Hornez, and H. C. Dubourguier. 1993. Influence de facteurs physico-chimiques sur les cinetiques de croissance de Pectinatus cerevisüphilus et de Megasphaera cerevisiae. Sci. Aliments 13:297-304.
28. Zweitering, M., H. I. Jongenburger, F. M. Rombouts, and K. Van'T Riet. 1990. Modeling of the bacterial growth curve. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56: 1875-1881.