Development and comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches to laparoscopic-assisted aortofemoral bypass in a porcine model

Journal of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 466-471

  Jones, D B ^a   Thompson, R W ^a   Soper, N J ^a   Olin, J M ^a   Rubin, B G ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL MODEL; AORTOFEMORAL BYPASS; ARTICLE; FEMALE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL APPROACH; SWINE;

EID: 0029925772     PISSN: 07415214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0741-5214(96)80012-7     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Soper NJ Brunt LM Kerbl K Laparoscopic general surgery N Engl J Med 330 1994 409 419
2. Barkun JS Barkun AN Sampalis JS Randomized control trial of laparoscopic vs. mini-cholecystectomy Lancet 340 1992 116 119
3. McMahon AJ Russell IT Baxter JN Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomized trial Lancet 343 1994 135 138
4. Dion YM Katkhouda N Rouleau C Aucoin A Laparoscopyassisted aortobifemoral bypass Surg Laparosc Endosc 3 1993 425 429
5. Berens E Herde JR Laparoscopic vascular surgery: four case reports J Vasc Surg 22 1995 73 79
6. Sicard GA Freeman MB Vanderwoude JC Anderson CB Comparison between the transabdominal and retroperitoneal approach for reconstruction of the infrarenal aorta J Vasc Surg 5 1987 19 27
7. Sicard GA Reilly JM Rubin BG Transabdominal versus retroperitoneal incision for abdominal aortic surgery: report of a prospective randomized trial J Vasc Surg 21 1995 174 183
8. Smith RS Fry WR Tsoi KM Gasless laparoscopy and conventional instruments: the next phase of minimally invasive surgery Arch Surg 128 1993 1102 1107
9. Golletti O Buccianti P Cavina E Laparoscopic sonography 1st ed. 1994 Editoriale Grasso Bologna