The effect of binocular stimulation on each component of transient and steady-state VEPs

Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Evoked Potentials

Volumn 100, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 177-183

  Tobimatsu, Shozo ^a   Kato, Motohiro ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Binocular interaction; N70; P100; Second and fourth harmonics; Visual evoked potentials (VEPs)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FACILITATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISION; VISUAL DISORDER; VISUAL STIMULATION; VOLUNTEER;

EID: 0029924933     PISSN: 01685597     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(95)00273-1     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Adachi-Usami, E. and Lehmann, D. Monocular and binocular evoked average potential Meld topography: upper and lower hemiretinal stimuli. Exp. Brain Res., 1983, 50: 341-346.
2. Allison, T., Hume, A.L., Wood, C.C. and Goff, W.R. Developmental and aging changes in somatosensory, auditory and visual evoked potentials. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1984, 58: 14-24.
3. Apkarian, P.A., Nakayama, K. and Tyler, C.W. Binocularity in the human visual evoked potential: facilitation, summation and suppression. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1981, 51: 32-48.
4. Bagolini, B., Porciatti, V. and Falsini, B. Binocular interaction and steady-state visual evoked potentials. I. A study in normal subjects and in subjects with defective binocular vision. Graefe's Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol., 1988, 226: 401-406.
5. Bobak, P., Friedman, R., Brigell, M., Goodwin, J. and Anderson, R. Visual evoked potentials to multiple temporal frequencies. Use in the differential diagnosis of optic neuropathy. Arch. Ophthalmol., 1988, 106: 936-940.
6. Bodis-Wollner, I., Onofrj, M.C., Marx, M.S. and Mylin, L.H. Visual evoked potentials in Parkinson's disease: spatial frequency, temporal rate, contrast and the effect of dopaminergic drugs. In: R.Q. Cracco and I. Bodis-Wollner (Eds.), Evoked Potentials. Alan R. Liss, New York, 1986: 307-319.
7. Celesia, G.G., Kaufman, D. and Cone, S. Effects of age and sex on pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1987, 68: 161-171.
8. Celesia, G.G., Brigell, M., Gunnink, R. and Dang, H. Spatial frequency evoked visuograms in multiple sclerosis. Neurology, 1992, 42: 1067-1070.
9. Celesia, G.G., Villa, A.E.P., Brigell, M., Rubboli, G., Bolcioni, G. and Fiori, M.G. An electrophysiological study of visual processing in Alzheimer's disease. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1993, 87: 97-104.
10. Ghilardi, M.F., Sartucci, F., Brannan, J.R., Onofrj, M.C., Bodis-Wolber, I., Mylin, L. and Stroch, R. N70 and P100 can be independently affected in multiple sclerosis. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1991, 80: 1-7.
11. Heravian, J.S., Jenkins, T.C.A. and Douthwaite, W.A. Binocular summation in visually evoked responses and visual acuity. Optimal. Physiol. Opt., 1990, 10: 257-261.
12. Hubel, D.H. and Wiesel, T.N. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.), 1968, 195: 215-243.
13. Johansson, B. and Jakobsson, P. VEP latency - a comparison between normal and defective binocularity. Clin. Vis. Sci., 1993, 8: 245-251.
14. Katsumi, O., Tanino, T. and Hirose, T. Objective evaluation of binocular function with pattern reversal VER. I. Effect of contrast. Acta Ophthalmol., 1985, 63: 706-711.
15. Katsumi, O., Tanino, T. and Hirose, T. Objective evaluation of binocular function using the pattern reversal visual evoked response. II. Effect of mean luminosity. Acta Ophthalmol., 1986, 64: 199-205.
16. Katsumi, O., Tanino, T. and Hirose, T. Objective evaluation of binocular function with pattern reversal VER. IV. Effect of spatial and temporal frequency. Acta Ophthalmol., 1988, 66: 194-200.
17. Kurita-Tashima, S., Tobimatsu, S., Nakayama-Hiromatsu, M. and Kato, M. Effect of check size on the pattern reversal visual evoked potential. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1991, 80: 161-166.
18. Minke, B. and Auerbach, E. Latencies and correlation in single units and visual evoked potentials in the cat striate cortex following monocular and binocular stimulations. Exp. Brain Res., 1972, 14: 409-422.
19. Nakayatna, K. and Mackeben, M. Steady state visual evoked potentials in the alert primate. Vision Res., 1982, 22: 1261-1271.
20. Noachtar, S., Hashimoto, T. and Lüders, H. Pattern visual evoked potentials recorded from human occipital cortex with chronic subdural electrodes. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1993, 88: 435-446.
21. Nuzzi, G. and Franchi, A. Binocular interaction in visual-evoked responses: summation, facilitation and inhibition in a clinical study of binocular vision. Ophthal. Res., 1983, 15: 261-264.
22. Previc, F.H. Origins and implications of frequency-doubling in the visual evoked potential. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt, 1987, 64: 664-673.
23. Previc, F.H. The neurophysiological significance of the N1 and P1 component of the visual evoked potential. Clin. Vis. Sci., 1988, 3: 195-202.
24. Regan, D. Comparison of transient and steady-state methods. Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 1982, 388: 45-71.
25. Schroeder, C.E., Tenke, C.E., Givre, S.J., Arezzo, J.C. and Vaughan, Jr., H.G. Striate cortical contribution to the surface-recorded pattern-reversal VEP in the alert monkey. Vision Res., 1991, 31: 1143-1157.
26. Shea, S.L., Aslin, R.N. and McCulloch, D. Binocular VEP summation in infants and adults with abnormal binocular histories. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 1987, 28: 356-365.
27. Spileers, W., Orban, G.A., Macs, H. and Missotten, L. CMSS-VEPs: contrast modulated steady state visual evoked potentials: its neuronal origin and clinical use. Doc. Ophthalmol., 1988, 68: 363-374.
28. Srebro, R. The visually evoked response. Binocular facilitation and failure when binocular vision is disturbed. Arch. Ophthalmol., 1978, 96: 839-844.
29. Strasburger, H., Scheidler, W. and Rentschier, I. Amplitude and phase characteristics of the steady-state visual evoked potential. Appl. Opt., 1988, 27: 1069-1088.
30. Tobimatsu, S., Tashima-Kurita, S., Nakayama-Hiromatsu, M. and Kato, M. Clinical relevance of phase of steady-state VEPs to P100 latency of transient VEPs. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1991, 80: 89-93.
31. Tobimatsu, S., Kurita-Tashima, S., Nakayama-Hiromatsu, M. and Kato, M. Effect of spatial frequency on transient and steady-state VEPs: stimulation with checkerboard, square-wave grating and sinusoidal grating patterns. J. Neurol. Sci., 1993, 118: 17-24.
32. Tomoda, H., Celesia, G.G. and Toleikis, S.C. Effect of spatial frequency on simultaneous recorded steady-state pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1991a, 80: 81-88.
33. Tomoda, H., Celesia, G.G., Brigell, M. and Toleikis, S. The effects of age on steady-state pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials. Doc. Ophthalmol., 1991b, 77: 201-211.
34. Tyler, C.W. and Apkarian, P.A. Effects of contrast, orientation, and binocularity in the pattern evoked potential. Vision Res., 1985, 25: 755-766.