Pacemaker patient-triggered event recording: Accuracy, utility, and cost for the pacemaker follow-up clinic

PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Volumn 19, Issue 11 II, 1996, Pages 1813-1818

  Machado, Christian ^a   Johnson, Delos ^b   Thacker, James R ^b   Duncan, James L ^b  

^a Heart Institute   (United States)

^b Pacesetter Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

loop event monitoring; pacemaker; patient triggered event records; PTER

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART RATE; HEART RHYTHM; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MALE; MONITORING; SICK SINUS SYNDROME;

EID: 0029919379     PISSN: 01478389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03231.x     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Sutton R, Kenny R. The natural history of sick sinus syndrome. PACE 1986; 9:1110-1114.
2. Simon AB, Zloto A. Symptomatic sinus node disease: Natural history after permanent ventricular pacing. PACE 1979; 2:305-314.
3. Sgarbossa E, Pinski S, Maloney J, et al. Chronic atrial fibrillation and stroke in paced patients with sick sinus syndrome: Relevance of clinical characteristics and pacing modalities. Circulation 1993; 88:1045-1053.
4. Sweesy M, Erickson S, Crago J, et al. Analysis of the effectiveness of in-office and transtelephonic follow-up in terms of pacemaker system complications. PACE 1994; 17:2001-2003.