Respiratory and laryngeal function associated with experimental coupling of the oral and nasal cavities

Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 118-126

  Sapienza, Christine M ^a,c   Brown, W S ^a,c   Williams, William N ^a,c   Wharton, Paul W ^b,c   Turner, Glenn E ^a,c  

^a Dept of Communication Processes ^*

^b Univ Hlth Sci Center/Jacksonville   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

experimental; laryngeal; palatal fistula; palatal opening; respiratory kinematic; single subject

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FISTULA; HARD PALATE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LARYNX; LUNG VOLUME; MALE; MOUTH CAVITY; NOSE AIRFLOW; NOSE CAVITY; PALATOPHARYNGEAL INCOMPETENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPIRATORY FUNCTION; SOFT PALATE; SOUND PRESSURE; SPEECH;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; AIR PRESSURE; CLEFT PALATE; FISTULA; HUMANS; LARYNX; LUNG VOLUME MEASUREMENTS; MALE; NASAL CAVITY; NOSE DISEASES; PALATAL OBTURATORS; PALATE; PULMONARY VENTILATION; RESPIRATORY MECHANICS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH DISORDERS; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; SPIROMETRY; TRANSDUCERS, PRESSURE; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 0029918305     PISSN: 10556656     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569(1996)033<0118:RALFAW>2.3.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. BERNTHAL JE, BEUKELMAN DR. The effect of changes in velopharyngeal orifice area on vowel intensity. Cleft Palate J 1977:14.3-77.
2. BJORK L. Velopharyngeal function in connected speech. Studies using tomography and cineradiography synchronized with speech spectrography. Acta Radiol Suppl 1961;202.
3. BZOCH KR. Measurement and assessment of categorical aspects of cleft palate language, voice, and speech disorders. In: Bzoch KR, ed. Communicative disorders related to cleft lip and palate. Austin: Pro-Ed, 1989.
4. DALSTON RD, WARREN DW, MORR KE, SMITH LR. Intraoral pressure and its relationship to velopharyngeal inadequacy Cleft Palate J 1988;25:210-219.
5. DROMEY, CD, STATHOPOLLOS ET, SAPIENZA CM. Glottal airflow and electroglottographic measures of vocal function at multiple intensities. J Voice I:44-54.
6. GUYETTE TW, SMITH BE, REISBERG DJ. Aerodynamic estimates of induced anterior orifice openings in human subjects. Cleft Palate J 1994;31:185-192.
7. HIXON TJ. Respiratory function in speech and song. Boston: College-Hill Press: Little, Brown, 1987.
8. HOIT JH, HIXON TJ. Age and speech breathing. J Speech Hear Res 1987;30:351-366.
9. HOLMBERG EB, HILLMAN RB, PERKELL J. Glottal airflow and transglottal air pressure measurements for male and female speakers in soft, normal, and loud voice. J Acoust Soc Am 1988;84:511-529.
10. HONDA K. Relationship between pitch control and vowel articulation. In:Bless DM, Abbs JH, eds. Vocal folds physiology: contemporary research and clinical issues. San Diego: College-Hill, 1983:286-297.
11. LAINE T, WARREN DW, DALSTON RM, HAIRFIELD WM, MORR KE. Intraoral pressure, nasal pressure and airflow rate in cleft palate speech. J Speech Hear Res 1988;31:432-437.
12. MCWILLIAMS BJ, GLASER ER, PHILIPS BJ, LAWRENCE C, LAVORATO AS, BEERY Q, SKOLNICK ML. A comparative study of four methods of evaluating velopharyngeal adequacy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981;68:1-10.
13. MILENKOVIC P. Cspeech 4.0 Computer software program. Madison. WI: University of Wisconsin, 1992.
14. PUTNAM AHB, SHELTON RL, KASTNER CU. Intraoral air pressure and oral airflow under different bleed and bite-block conditions. J Speech Hear Res 1986;29:37-49.
15. SHPRINTZEN RJ, CROFT C, LEWIN ML, RAKOFF S. The relationship of perceived hypernasality to velopharyngeal gap size during speech. Cleft Palate J 1977;21:91-99.
16. STATHOPOULOS ET, SAPIENZA CM. Respiratory and laryngeal function of women and men during vocal intensity variation. J Speech Hear Res 1993;36:64-75.
17. SUBTELNY JD, WORTH JH. Intraoral pressure and rate of flow during speech. J Speech Hear Res 1966;9:498-518.
18. WARREN DW Velopharyngeal orifice size and upper pharyngeal pressure-flow patterns in cleft palate speech: a preliminary study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1964;34:15-26.
19. WARREN DW, DUBOIS AB. A pressure-flow technique for measuring velopharyngeal orifice area during continuous speech. Cleft Palate J 1964;1:52-71
20. WARREN DW, DEVEREUX JL. An analog study of cleft palate speech. Cleft Palate J 1966;4.38-46.
21. WARREN DW, WOOD MT, BRADLEY DP. Respiratory volumes in normal and cleft palate speech. Cleft Palate J 1969;6:449-460.
22. WARREN DW. Regulation/control of speech aerodynamics. ASHA 1985,27:111.
23. WARREN DW. Regulation/control of speech aerodynamics. Folia Phoniatr 1986;38:368.
24. WARREN DW, MORR KE, PUTNAM-ROCHET A, DALSTON RE. Respiratory response to a decrease in velopharyngeal resistence. J Acoust Soc Am 1989;86:917-924.
25. WATTERSON T, EMANUEL F. Observed effects of velopharyngeal orifice size on vowel identification and vowel nasality. Cleft Palate J 1981;18:271-278.