Trends in photoprotection in American fashion magazines, 1983-1993: Will fashion make you look old and ugly?

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 424-428

  George, Pierre M ^a   Kuskowski, Michael ^b   Schmidt, Christopher ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COSMETIC; SUNSCREEN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER PREVENTION; CHILD; EDUCATION PROGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MASS MEDIUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; SKIN CANCER; SUN EXPOSURE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0029916539     PISSN: 01909622     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0190-9622(96)90433-8     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Hill D, White V, Marks R, et al. Changes in sun-related attitudes and behaviors and reduced sunburn prevalence in a population at high risk of melanoma. Eur J Cancer Prev 1993;2:447-56.
2. Mawn VB, Fleischer AB Jr. A survey of attitudes, beliefs, and behavior regarding tanning bed use, sunbathing, and sunscreen use. J AM ACAD DERMATOL 1993;29:959-62.
3. Chapman S, Marks R, King M. Trends in tans and skin protection in Australian fashion magazines, 1982 through 1991. Am J Public Health 1992;82:1677-80.
4. Lund CC, Browder NC. The estimation of areas of burns. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1944;352-8.
5. Department of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug Administration. Sunscreen drug products for over-the-counter human use: tentative final monograph. Fed Reg 1993;58:28194-302.
6. Threlfall TJ. Sunglasses and clothing - An unhealthy correlation? Aust J Public Health 1992;16:192-6.