Patch tests: Evaluation by instrumental methods

Clinics in Dermatology

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 41-50

  De Boer, Edith M ^a   Bruynzeel, Derk P ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DANSYL CHLORIDE; DETERGENT; SOAP;

CLINICAL TRIAL; EXPOSURE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LASER DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; METHODOLOGY; PATCH TEST; PH; PHOTOELECTRIC PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SKIN BIOPSY; SKIN COLOR; SKIN CONDUCTANCE; SKIN IRRITATION; SKIN WATER LOSS; THERMOGRAPHY;

EID: 0029915388     PISSN: 0738081X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0738-081X(95)00107-Q     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. De Boer EM, Bruynzeel DP. Irritancy. In: Berardesca E, Elsner P, Maibach HI, editors. Bioengineering of the skin: Cutaneous blood flow and erythema. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1995;199-215.
2. Björnborg A. Skin reactions to primary irritants in patients with handeczema. Oscar Isacson Tryckeri AB. Thesis. Göteborg, 1968;130-6.
3. Gloor M. Pharmakologie dermatologischer externa. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1982.
4. Goenraads PJ, Bleumink E, Nater PJ. Susceptibility to primary irritants. Contact Dermatitis 1975;1:377-81.
5. Anderson C, Sundberg K, Groth O. Animal model for assessment of skin irritancy. Contact Dermatitis 1986;15: 143-51.
6. Van Neste D, Mahmoud G, Masmoudi M. Experimental induction of rough dermatitic skin in humans. Contact Dermatitis 1987;16:27-33.
7. Tupker RA. The influence of detergents on the human skin: A study on factors determining the individual susceptibility assessed by transepidermal water loss. Thesis. Groningen, 1990.
8. Mathias CGT. Clinical and experimental aspects of cutaneous irritation. In: Marzulli FN, Maibach HI, editors. Dermatotoxicology. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing, 1986;173-89.
9. Frosch PJ, Kligman AM. The Duhring chamber: An improved technique for epicutaneous testing of irritant and allergic reactions. Contact Dermatitis 1979;5:73-81.
10. Andersen KE, Burrows D, White IR. Allergens from the standard series. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, editors. Textbook of contact dermatitis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1992;416-56.
11. Frosch PJ, Kligman AM. The soap chamber test: A new method for assessing the irritancy of soaps. J Am Acad Dermatol 1979;1:35-41.
12. Van Ketel WG, Bruynzeel DP, Bezemer PD, Stamhuis HI. Toxicity of handcleaners. Dermatologica 1984;168:94-9.
13. Shellow WVR, Rapaport MJ. Comparison testing of soap irritancy using aluminum chamber and standard patch methods. Contact Dermatitis 1981;7:77-9.
14. Lanman BM, Elvers WB, Howard CS. The case of human patch testing in a product development program. In: Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Cosmetic Science, Toilet Goods Association, editors. Washington, DC, 1968; 135-45.
15. Pinnagoda J, Tupker RA, Coenraads PJ, Nater JP. Comparability and reproducibility of the results of water loss measurements: A study of 4 evaporimeters. Contact Dermatitis 1989;20:241-6.
16. Pinnagoda J, Tupker RA, Agner T, Serup J. Guidelines for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement: A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1990;22: 164-78.
17. Barardesca E, Maibach HI. Monitoring the water-holding capacity in visually non-irritated skin by plastic occlusion stress test. Clin Exp Dermatol 1990;15:107-10.
18. Agner T, Serup J. Skin reactions to irritants assessed by polysulfide rubber replica. Contact Dermatitis 1987;17: 205-11.
19. Kawai K, Nakagawa M, Kawai J, Kawai K. Evaluation of skin irritancy of sodium lauryl sulphate: A comparative study between the replica method and visual evaluation. Contact Dermatitis 1992;27:174-81.
20. Hamami I, Marks R. Structural determinants of the response of the skin to chemical irritants. Contact Dermatitis 1988;18:71-5.
21. Takahashi M. Image analysis of skin surface contour. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1994 (Suppl 185):9-14.
22. Tagami H, Ohi M, Iwatsuki K, et al. Evaluation of the skin surface hydration in vivo by electrical measurement. J Invest Dermatol 1980;75:500-7.
23. Tagami H. Quantitative measurements of water concentration of the stratum corneum in vivo by high-frequency current. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1994 (Suppl 185): 29-33.
24. Ozawa T, Takahashi M. Skin hydration: Recent advances. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1994 (Suppl 185):26-8.
25. Wilhelm KP, Freitag G, Wolff HH. Surfactant-induced skin irritation and skin repair. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994; 30:944-9.
26. Yamamoto Y. Measurement and analysis of skin electrical impedance. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1994 (Suppl 185):34-8.
27. Tenland T. On laser Doppler flowmetry. Linköping, Thesis, 1982.
28. Shepherd AP, Obey PÅ, editors. Laser Doppler blood flowmetry. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990.
29. Berardesca E, Elsner P, Maibach HI, editors. Bioengineering of the skin: Cutaneous blood flow and erythema. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1995.
30. De Boer EM, Bezemer PD, Bruynzeel DP. A standard method for repeated recording of skin blood flow using laser Doppler flowmetry. Dermatosen 1989;37:58-62.
31. Olivarius F, Agner T, Menné T. Skin barrier function and dermal inflammation. Br J Dermatol 1993;129:554-7.
32. Bircher A, De Boer EM, Agner T, et al. Guidelines for measurement of cutaneous blood flow by laser Doppler flowmetry: A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1994;30:65-72.
33. Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI. Skin color reflectance measurements for objective quantification of erythema in human beings. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989;21:1306-8.
34. Elsner P. Chromametry: Hardware, measuring principles, and standardization of measurements. In: Berardesca E, Elsner P, Maibach HI, editors. Bioengineering of the skin: Cutaneous blood flow and erythema. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1995; 247-52.
35. Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI. Evaluation of irritation tests by chromametric measurements. In: Berardesca E, Elsner P, Maibach HI, editors. Bioengineering of the skin: Cutaneous blood flow and erythema. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1995;269-80.
36. Weatherall IL, Coombs BD. Skin color measurements in terms of CIELAB color space values. J Invest Dermatol 1992;99:468-73.
37. Takiwaki H, Overgaard L, Serup J. Comparison of narrow-band reflectance spectro-photometric and tristimulus colorimetric measurement of skin color: Twenty-three anatomical sites evaluated by the Derma Spectrometer® and the Chroma Meter CR-200®. Skin Pharmacol 1994;7: 217-25.
38. Andersen PH, Bjerring P. Remittance spectroscopy: Hardware and measuring principles. In: Berardesca E, Elsner P, Maibach HI, editors. Bioengineering of the skin: Cutaneous blood flow and erythema. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1995:231-41.
39. Ring EFG. Skin temperature measurement. Bioeng Skin 1986;2:15-30.
40. Serup J. Contact thermography - Towards the Sherlock Holmes magnifying glass for solving allergic and irritant patch test reactions? Contact Dermatitis 1987;17:61-3.
41. Agner T, Serup J. Contact thermography for assessment of skin damage due to experimental irritants. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1988;68:192-5.
42. Seidenari S, Di Nardo A, Pepe P, Gianetti A. Ultrasound B scanning with image analysis for assessment of allergic patch test reactions. Contact Dermatitis 1991;24:216-22.
43. Seidenari S, Di Nardo A. B scanning evaluation of irritant reactions with binary transformation and image analysis. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1992 (Suppl 175):9-13.
44. Vieluf D. Skin roughness-measuring methods and dependence on washing procedure. In: Braun-Falco, Korting HC, editors. Skin cleansing with synthetic detergents. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1990;130.
45. Paye M, Simion FA, Pierard GE. Dansyl chloride labelling of stratum corneum: Its rapid extraction from skin can predict skin irritation due to surfactants and cleansing products. Contact Dermatitis 1994;30:91-6.
46. Dikstein S, Zlotogorski A. Measurement of skin pH. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1994 (Suppl 185):18-20.
47. Korting HC, Kober M, Mueller M, Braun-Falco O. Influence of repeated washings with soap and synthetic detergents on pH and resident flora of the skin of forehead and forearm. Acta Dermatol Venereol (Stockh) 1987;67:41-7.
48. Bruynzeel DP, van Ketel WG, Scheper RJ, von Blombergvan der Flier BME. Delayed time course of irritation by sodium lauryl sulfate: Observations on threshold reactions. Contact Dermatitis 1982;8:236-9.
49. Agner T, Serup J. Individual and instrumental variations in irritant patch-test reactions - Clinical evaluation and quantification by bioengineering methods. Clin Exp Dermatol 1990;15:29-33.
50. Serup J, Agner T. Colorimetric quantification of erythema. Clin Exp Dermatol 1990;15:29-33.
51. Agner T. Basal transepidermal water loss, skin thickness, skin blood flow and skin colour in relation to sodium-lauryl-sulphate-induced irritation in normal skin. Contact Dermatitis 1991;25:108-14.
52. Agner T, Serup J. Individual and instrumental variations in irritant patch-tests reactions - Clinical evaluation and quantification by bioengineering methods. Clin Exp Dermatol 1990;15:29-33.
53. Gabard B. Appearance and regression of a local skin irritation in two different models. Dermatosen 1991;39:111-6.
54. Van Neste D, de Brouwer B. Monitoring of skin response to sodium lauryl sulphate: Clinical scores versus bioengineering methods. Contact Dermatitis 1992;27:151-6.
55. Van Neste D, Masmoudi M, Leroy B, et al. Repression pattern of transepidermal water loss and cutaneous blood flow values in sodium lauryl sulfate induced irritation: A human model of rough dermatitis skin. Bioeng Skin 1986; 2:103-18.
56. Eun HC, Jung SY. Comparison of irritant potential of shampoos using cultured human epidermal keratinocytes model and patch test reaction measured by laser Doppler flowmetry. Contact Dermatitis 1994;30:168-71.
57. Tupker RA, Pinnagoda J, Coenraads PJ, Nater JP. The influence of repeated exposure to surfactants on the human skin as determined by transepidermal water loss and visual scoring. Contact Dermatitis 1989;20:108-14.
58. Tupker RA, Pinnagoda J, Coenraads PJ, et al. Evaluation of hand cleansers: Assessment of composition, skin compatibility by transepidermal water loss measurements, and cleansing power. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1989;40:33-9.
59. Lee CH, Kawasaki Y, Maibach HI. Effect of surfactant mixtures on irritant contact dermatitis potential in man: Sodium lauroyl glutamate and sodium lauryl sulphate. Contact Dermatitis 1994;30:205-9.
60. van der Valk PGM, Crijns MC, Nater JP, Bleumink E. Skin irritancy of commercially available soap and detergent bars as measured by water vapour loss. Derm Beruf Umwelt 1984;32:87-90.
61. De Boer EM, Scholten RJPM, Van Ketel WG, Bruynzeel DP. Quantitation of mild irritant reactions due to repeated application of liquid cleaners: A laser Doppler flowmetry study. Int J Cosmet Sci 1990;12:43-52.
62. De Boer EM. Occupational dermatitis by metalworking fluids: An epidemiological study and an investigation on skin irritation using laser Doppler flowmetry. Amsterdam, Thesis, 1989.
63. van der Valk PGM. Water vapor loss measurements on human skin. Thesis, Groningen, 1984.
64. Wilhelm KP, Cua AB, Wolff HH, Maibach HI. Surfactant-induced stratum corneum hydration in vivo: Prediction of the irritant potential of anionic surfactants. J Invest Dermatol 1993;101:310-5.
65. Seidenari S, Belletti B. Instrumental evaluation of subclinical irritation induced by sodium lauryl sulfate. Contact Dermatitis 1994;30:175.
66. Simion FA, Rhein LD, Grove GL, et al. Sequential order of skin responses to surfactants during a soap chamber test. Contact Dermatitis 1991;25:242-9.
67. Elsner P, Wilhelm D, Maibach HI. Multiple parameter assessment of vulva irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1990;23:20-6.
68. Wolf R. Has mildness replaced cleanliness next to godliness? Dermatology 1994;189:217-21.