Ectopic pairing of homologous DNA and post-transcriptional gene silencing in transgenic plants

Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 173-180

  Baulcombe, David C ^a   English, James J ^a  

^a SAINSBURY LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; RNA;

GENE CONTROL; GENE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; TRANSGENIC PLANT;

EID: 0029913660     PISSN: 09581669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0958-1669(96)80009-7     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Jorgensen RA: Silencing of plant genes by homologous transgenes. AgBiotech News Inform 1992, 4:265-273.
2. Finnegan J, McElroy D: Transgene inactivation: plants fight back. Biotechnology 1994, 12:883-888.
3. Flavell RB: Inactivation of gene expression in plants as a consequence of specific sequence duplication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994, 91:3490-3496.
4. Dougherty WG, Parks TD: Transgenes and gene suppression - telling us something new. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1995, 7:399-405.
5. •].
6. Delange P, Vanblokland R, Kooter JM, Mol JNM: Suppression of flavonoid flower pigmentation genes In Petunia hybrid by the introduction of antisense and sense genes. Curr Topics Microbiol Immunol 1995, 197:57-75.
7. Matzke M, Matzke AJM, Sheid OM: Inactivation of repeated genes-DNA-DNA interaction? In Homologous Recombination and Gene Silencing in Plants. Edited by Paszkowski J. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1995:271-307.
8. •] are among the most informative of the many recent reviews on gene silencing in plants.
9. Matzke MA, Matzke AJM: Homology-dependent gene silencing in transgenic plants - what does It really tell us. Trends Genet 1995, 11:1-3.
10. Meins F, Kunz C: Gene silencing in transgenic plants - a heuristic autoregulation model. Curr Topics Microbiol Immunol 1995, 197:105-120.
11. Meyer P: Understanding and controlling transgene expression. Trends Biotechnol 1995, 13:332-337.
12. Phillips RL, Matzke MA, Oono K: Treasure your exceptions. Plant Cell 1995, 7:1522-1527.
13. Napoli C, Lemieux C, Jorgensen RA: Introduction of a chimeric chalcone synthase gene into Petunia results in reversible co-suppression of homologous genes in trans. Plant Cell 1990, 2:279-289.
14. Smith CJS, Watson CF, Bird CR, Ray J, Schuch W, Griersor D: Expression of a truncated tomato polygalacturonase gene inhibits expression of the endogenous gene in transgenic plants. Mol Gen Genet 1990, 224:447-481.
15. Van der Krol AR, Mur LA, Beld M, Mol JNM, Stuitji AR: Flavonoid genes in petunia: addition of a limited number of gene copies may lead to a suppression of gene expression. Plant Cell 1990, 2:291-299.
16. De Carvalho F, Gheysen G, Kushnir S, Van Montagu M, Inzé D, Castresana C: Suppression of β-1,3-glucanase transgene expression in homozygous plants. EMBO J 1992, 11:2595-2602.
17. Hart CM, Fischer B, Neuhaus JM, Meins F Jr: Regulated inactivation of homologous gene-expression in transgenic Nicotiana sylvestris plants containing a defense-related tobacco chitinase gene. Mol Gen Genet 1992, 235:179-108.
18. Fray RG, Grierson D: Identification and genetic analysis of normal and mutant phytoene synthase genes of tomato by sequencing, complementation and co-suppression. Plant Mol Biol 1993, 22:589-602.
19. Seymour GB, Fray RG, Hill P, Tucker GA: Down-regulation of two non-homologous endogenous tomato genes with a single chimaeric sense gene construct. Plant Mol Biol 1993, 23:1-9.
20. Angenent GC, Franken J, Busscher M, Weiss D, Vantunen AJ: Co-suppression of the petunia homeotic gene fbp2 affects the identity of the generative meristem. Plant J 1994, 5:33-44.
21. Boerjan W, Bauw G, Van Montagu M, Inzé D: Distinct phenotypes generated by overexpression and suppression of S-adenosyl-L-methionine synthetase reveal developmental patterns of gene silencing in tobacco. Plant Cell 1994, 6:1401-1414. These authors propose a model to explain developmental and spatial regulation of co-suppression. They suggest that co-suppression in a few cells would create a sink for the metabolite product of the silenced gene. The transport of metabolite in the sink would deplete adjacent cells and result in compensating activation of the unsilenced host gene. Expression of this gene would activate co-suppression either through a threshold mechanism or because it could function as a receptor locus (as is proposed in the present review).
22. Deborne FD, Vincentz M, Chupeau Y, Vaucheret H: Co-suppression of nitrate reductase host genes and transgenes in transgenic tobacco plants. Mol Gen Genet 1994, 243:613-621.
23. Van Blokland R, Van der Geest N, Mol JNM, Kooter JM: Transgene-mediated suppression of chalcone synthase expression in Petunia hybrids results from an increase in RNA turnover. Plant J 1994, 6:861-877. Illustrates that transgene expression is not relevant to co-suppression. Different CHS loci are shown to co-suppress the endogenous CHS loci irrespective of whether they are transcribed at high levels, low levels or not at all.
24. Brandle JE, McHugh SG, James L, Labbe H, Miki BL: Instability of transgene expression in-field grown tobacco carrying the csrl-l gene for sulfonylurea herbicide resistance. Biotechnology 1995, 13:994-998. Highlights the practical problems generated by co-suppression. Like [17], this study reveals that co-suppression is greatly influenced by the condition and treatment of the plant; transplantation of seedlings is shown to activate gene silencing.
25. De Carvalho Niebel F, Frendo P, Van Montagu M, Cornelissen M: Post-transcriptional cosuppression of β-glucanase genes does not affect accumulation of transgene nuclear mRNA. Plant Cell 1995, 7:347-358. Shows conclusively that co-suppression does not affect accumulation of pre-mRNA. The data could be consistent either with a block of mRNA transport out of the nucleus or degradation of the target RNA in the cytoplasm.
26. Palauqui JC, Vaucheret H: Field trial analysis of nitrate reductase co-suppression-a comparative-study of 38 combinations of transgene loci. Plant Mol Biol 1995, 29:149-159.
27. Vaucheret H, Palauqui JC, Elmayan T, Moffatt B: Molecular and genetic-analysis of nitrite reductase co-suppression in transgenic tobacco plants. Mol Gen Genet 1995, 248:311-317.
28. Hobbs SLA, Kpodar P, DeLong CMO: The effect of T-DNA copy number, position and methylation on reporter gene expression in tobacco transformants. Plant Mol Biol 1990, 15:851-864.
29. Hobbs SLA, Warkentin TD, DeLong CMO: Transgene copy number can be positively or negatively associated with transgene expression. Plant Mol Biol 1993, 21:17-26.
30. Dehio C, Schell J: Identification of plant genetic loci involved in post-transcriptional mechanism for meiotically reversible transgene silencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994, 91:5538-5542. Uses the rolB phenotype to select for mutant Arabidopsis with enhanced gene silencing. Illustrates that plant functions required for gene silencing can be mutated and therefore paves the way for extended mutational analysis of the trait and the eventual isolation of the genes involved.
31. Ingelbrecht I, Van Houdt H, Van Montagu M, Depicker A: Post-transcriptional silencing of reporter transgenes in tobacco correlates with DNA methylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994, 91:10502-10506. The first report demonstrating the association between transgene methylation and post-transcriptional gene silencing.
32. Smith HA, Swaney SL, Parks TD, Wernsman EA, Dougherty WG: Transgenic plant virus resistance mediated by untranslatable sense RNAs: expression, regulation, and fate of nonessential RNAs. Plant Cell 1994, 6:1441-1453. Reinforces the previously made association between gene silencing and virus resistance conferred by transgenes of viral cDNA [36]. This paper also describes the use of dihaploid techniques to produce families of plants that are genetically identical, but display different levels of resistance to PVY and gene silencing. Notably, the resistant/silenced lines contain viral transgenes with an increased level of methylation.
33. Mueller E, Gilbert JE, Davenport G, Brigneti G, Baulcombe DC: Homology dependent resistance: transgenic virus resistance in plants related to homology-dependent gene silencing. Plant J 1995, 7:1001-1013. Genetic analysis reveals that viral transgenes confer resistance through a mechanism associated with transgene trans-inactivation at the post-transcriptional level. Some of the data on gene dosage and silencing were interpreted at the time in terms of an expression threshold. A more up-to-date interpretation is now favoured based on the distinction of silencing and receptor loci and the ectopic paring of homologous loci.
34. English JJ, Mueller E, Baulcombe DC: Suppression of virus accumulation in transgenic plants exhibiting silencing of nuclear genes. Plant Cell 1996, 8:179-188. Illustrates the use of a virus to analyze post-transcriptional gene silencing. The data also reinforce the association between post-transcriptional gene silencing and transgene methylation, showing a concurrence of the target of silencing at the RNA level and transgene methylation at the DNA level. The demonstration that the methylation is localized to the transgene serves to emphasize that methylation analyses of post-transcriptionally silenced genes should inspect the gene in its entirety.
35. Lindbo JA, Silva-Rosales L, Proebsting WM, Dougherty WG: Induction of a highly specific antiviral state in transgenic plants: implications for regulation of gene expression and virus resistance. Plant Cell 1993, 5:1749-1759,
36. Baulcombe DC: Replicase mediated resistance: a novel type of virus resistance in transgenic plants? Trends Microbiol 1994, 2:60-63.
37. Lomonossoff GP: Pathogen-derived resistance to plant viruses. Annu Rev Phytopathol 1995, 33:323-343. An assessment of all aspects of virus resistance in transgenic plants. The prominent emphasis on the potential role of the co-suppression mechanism by this author, a proponent of replicase mediated virus resistance, illustrates how the perspective of the virology community is changing.
38. Goodwin J, Chapman K, Parks TD, Wernsman EA, Dougherty WG: Genetic and biochemical dissection of transgenic RNA-mediated resistance. Plant Cell 1996, 8:95-105. An elegant use of doubled haploid lines to confirm that the potential for post-transcriptional silencing/resistance is increased with multiple transgene loci. Biochemical analysis of putative breakdown products of the silenced RNA species is carried out. This analysis reinforces the earlier findings indicating specific target sites for the silencing/resistance mechanism [14].
39. Assaad FF, Tucker KL, Signer ER: Epignetic repeat-induced gene silencing (RIGS) in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol 1993, 22:1067-1085.
40. Meyer P, Heidmann I, Niedenhof I: Differences in DNA methylatlon are associated with a paramutatlon phenomenon in transgenic petunia. Plant J 1993, 4:89-100.
41. Barry C, Faugeron G, Rossignol J-L: Methylation induced prerneiotically in Ascobulus: Coextension with DNA repeat lengths and effect on transcript elongation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993, 90:4557-4561.
42. Breyne P, Van Montagu M, Depicker A, Gheysen G: Characterization of a plant scaffold attachment region in a DNA fragment that normalizes transgene expression in tobacco. Plant Cell 1992, 4:463-471.
43. Allen GC, Hall GE, Childs LC, Weissinger AK, Spiker S, Thompson WF: Scaffold attachment regions increase reporter gene expression in stably transformed plant-cells. Plant Cell 1993, 5:603-613.
44. Mlynarova L, Loonen A, Heldens J, Jansen RC, Keizer P, Stiekema WJ, Nap JP: Reduced position effect in mature transgenic plants conferred by the chicken lysozyme matrix associated region. Plant Cell 1994, 6:417-426.
45. Mlynarova L, Jansen RC, Conner AJ, Stiekema WJ, Nap JP: The MAR-mediated reduction in position effect can be uncoupled from copy number-dependent expression in transgenic plants. Plant Cell 1995, 7:599-609. Extends the previous analysis [44] and supports the conclusions from [46] that MARs protect a gene from transcriptional and post-transcriptional gene silencing. Even with MARs, however, there is still a level of control over transgene expression that is not understood, as previously suggested [44].
46. Schiebel W, Haas B, Marinkovic S, Klanner A, Sanger HL: RNA directed RNA polymerase from tomato leaves. I. Purification and physical properties. J Biol Chem 1993, 263:11851-11857.
47. Schiebel W, Haas B, Marinkovic S, Klanner A, Sanger HL: RNA directed RNA polymerase from tomato leaves. II. Catalytic in vitro properties. J Biol Chem 1993, 268:11858-11867.
48. Vaucheret H, Kronenberger J, Lepingle A, Vilaine F, Boulin JP, Caboche M: Inhibition of tobacco nitrite reductase activity by expression of antisense RNA. Plant J 1992, 2:559-569.
49. Hofgen R, Axelsen KB, Kannangara CG, Schuttke I, Pohlenz H-D, Willmitzer L, Grimm B, Von Wettstein D: A visible marker for antisense mRNA expression in plants: inhibition of chlorophyll synthesis with a glutamate-1-semialdehyde aminotransferase antisense gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994, 91:1726-1730. Illustrates the use of antisense transgenes to suppress chlorophyll biosynthesis, but also shows that the chlorotic phenotype does not necessarily reflect the known pattern of expression of the promoter in the antisense constructs. The sectoring of suppression in one set of lines is as one would expect if there were somatically unstable methylation of the endogenous genes as a result of ectopic pairing with the antisense transgene.
50. Hammond J, Kamo KK: Effective resistance to potyvirus infection conferred by expression of antisense RNA in transgenic plants. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 1995, 8:674-682. The introduction reviews the previous unsuccessful attempts to control RNA viruses with antisense transgenes. The data provide one of only a few successful applications of these antisense transgenes against viruses.
51. Kaido M, Mon M, Mise K, Okuno T, Furusawa I: Inhibition of brome mosaic virus (BMV) amplification in protoplasts from transgenic tobacco plants expressing replicable BMV RNAs. J Gen Virol 1995, 76:2827-2833. This paper prompts the question of why do viruses not activate gene silencing in the course of a normal infection? Is it because there must be DMA with homology to the virus or is it because the transgene allows the virus to enter cells that are not normally infected?
52. Wassenegger M, Heimes S, Riedel L, Sänger HL: RNA-dlrected de novo methylation of genomic sequences in plants. Cell 1994, 76:567-576. The first and so far only report of RNA-directed methylation of DNA in plants. This phenomenon could be central to many aspects of epigenetic phenomena in plants. It should be a matter of priority to find out whether this effect of RNA on DNA is specific to viroid RNAs.
53. Kumagai MH, Donson J, Della-Cioppa G, Harvey D, Hanley K, Grill LK: Cytoplasmic inhibition of carotenoid biosynthesis with virus-derived RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995, 92:1679-1683. This paper leaves many questions unanswered, but describes how RNA viruses may be useful for both over-expression and suppression of host genes. These findings suggest novel applications of viruses as research tools in the analysis of the function of unknown gene products. These data also suggest that viruses may be useful in the analysis of gene silencing.
54. Longstaff M, Brigneti G, Boccard F, Chapman S, Baulcombe DC: Extreme resistance to potato virus X infection in plants expressing a modified component of the putative viral replicase. EMBO J 1993, 12:379-386.
55. Ronchi A, Petroni K, Tonelli C: The reduced expression of endogenous duplications (REED) in the maize R gene family is mediated by DNA methylation. EMBO J 1995, 14:5318-5328.
56. Bender J, Fink G: Epigenetic control of an endogenous gene family is revealed by a novel blue fluorescent mutant of Arabidopsis. Cell 1995, 83:725-734.
57. Martienssen RA, Richards EJ: DNA methylation in eukaryotes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1995, 5:234-242.
58. Sherwood JL: Mechanisms of cross protection between virus strains. In Plant Resistance to Viruses. Edited by Evered D, Harnett S. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons Ltd; 1988:144-157.