Flower-fruit size allometry at three taxonomic levels in Crepis (Asteraceae)

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 401-407

  Andersson, Stefan ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

evolutionary constraints; floral evolution; major axis regression

Indexed keywords

ASTERACEAE; COROLLA; CREPIS; CREPIS TECTORUM;

EID: 0029911843     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/bijl.1996.0044     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Andersson S. 1989a. Phenotypic plasticity in Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 168: 19-38.
2. Andersson S. 1989b. The evolution of self-fertility in Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 168: 227-236.
3. Andersson S. 1991. Quantitative genetic variation in a population of Crepis tectorum subsp. pumila (Asteraceae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 44: 381-393.
4. Andersson S. 1992. Phenotypic selection in a population of Crepis tectorum subsp. pumila. Canadian Journal of Botany 70: 89-95.
5. Andersson S. 1993a. Population differentiation in Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae): patterns of correlation among characters. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 49: 185-194.
6. Andersson S. 1993b. Morphometric differentiation, patterns of interfertility, and the genetic basis of character evolution in Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 184: 27-40.
7. Andersson S. 1996. Seed size as a determinant of germination rate in Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae): evidence from a seed burial experiment. Canadian Journal of Botany 74: 568-572.
8. Armbruster WS. 1991. Multilevel analysis of morphometric data from natural plant populations: insights into ontogenetic, genetic, and selective correlations in Dalechampia scandens. Evolution 45: 1229-1244.
9. Arnold S. 1992. Constraints on phenotypic evolution. American Naturalist 140 (suppl.): 85-107.
10. Babcock EB. 1947. The genus Crepis I-II Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California press.
11. Berg R. 1960. The ecological significance of correlation pleiades. Evolution 17: 171-180.
12. Bond WJ, Midgley J. 1988. Allometry and sexual differences in leaf size. American Naturalist 131: 901-910.
13. Carr DE, Fenster CB. 1994. Levels of genetic variation and covariation for Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae) floral traits. Heredity 72: 606-618.
14. Cheverud JM. 1982. Phenotypic, genotypic, and environmental morphological integration in the cranium. Evolution 36: 499-516
15. Clutton-Brock TH, Harvey PH. 1980. Primates, brains and ecology. Journal of Zoology, London 190: 309-323.
16. Conner J, Via S. 1993. Patterns of phenotypic and genetic correlations among morphological and life-history traits in wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Evolution 47: 70-4-711.
17. Corner EJH. 1949. The durian theory and the origin of the modern tree. Annals of Botany 13: 367-414.
18. Falconer DS. 1981. Introduction to quantitative genetics. New York: Longman.
19. Giles BA, Bengtsson BO. 1988. Variation in another size in wild barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum). Hereditas 108: 199-205.
20. Harvey PH, Pagel MD. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Huxley JS. 1932. Problems of relative growth. London: Methuen.
22. Kirk WDJ. 1993. Interspecific size and number variation in pollen grains and seeds. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 49: 239-248.
23. Kluge AG, Kerfoot WC. 1973. The predictability of regularity of character divergence. American Naturalist 107: 426-442.
24. Lande R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution 33: 402-416.
25. Lande R, Arnold SJ. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 1210-1226.
26. McCune B. 1988. Ecological diversity in North American pines. American Journal of Botany 75: 353-368.
27. Maitre DC, Midgley J. 1991. Allometric relationships between leaf and inflorescence mass in the genus Protea (Proteaceae): an analysis of the exceptions to the rule. Functional Ecology 5: 467-484.
28. Mazer SJ, Wheelwright NT. 1993. Fruit size and shape: allometry at different taxonomic levels in bird-dispersed plants. Evolutionary Ecology 7: 556-575.
29. MidgleyJ, Bond W. 1989. Leaf size and inflorescence size may be allometrically related traits. Oecologia (Berl.) 78: 427-429.
30. Midgley J, Cowling RM, Lamont BB. 1991. Relationship of follicle size and seed size in Hakea (Proteaceae); isometry, allometry and adaptation. South African Journal of Botany 57: 107-110.
31. Nildas KJ, Buchman SL. 1994. The allometry of saguaro height. American Journal of Botany 81: 1161-1168.
32. Olson EC, Miller RL. 1958. Morphological integration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. Primack RB. 1987. Relationships among flowers, fruits, and seeds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 409-130
34. Riska B. 1986. Some models for development, growth and morphometric correlation Evolution 40: 1303-1311.
35. Riska B, Atchley WR. 1985. Genetics of growth predict patterns of brain-size evolution. Science 229: 668-671.
36. Sokal RR. 1978. Population differentiation: something different or more of the same? In Brussard PF, ed Ecological Genetics: The Interface. New York: Springer-Verlag, 215-239.
37. Sokal RR, Riska B. 1981. Geographic variation in Pemphigus populitransversus (Insecta: Aphididae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 15: 201-233
38. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1981. Biometry, San Francisco: Freeman.
39. Thomson K, Rabinowitz D. 1988. Do big plants have big seeds? American Naturalist 133: 722-728.
40. Wagner G. 1984. Coevolution of functionally constrained characters: prerequisites for adaptive versatility. BioSystems 17: 51-55.
41. Zeng Z-B. 1988. Long-term correlated response, interpopulation covariation, and interspecific allometry. Evolution 42: 363-374.