Judging hospitals by severity-adjusted mortality rates: The influence of the severity-adjustment method

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 86, Issue 10, 1996, Pages 1379-1387

  Iezzoni, Lisa I ^a   Ash, Arlene S ^a,c   Shwartz, Michael ^a,d   Daley, Jennifer ^a,e   Hughes, John S ^a,b   Mackieman, Yevgenia D ^a,b  

^a BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e VA CONNECTICUT HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ADULT; ARTICLE; DISEASE SEVERITY; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD; MORTALITY;

EID: 0029910569     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.86.10.1379     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Epstein A. Performance reports on quality-prototypes, problems, and prospects. NEngUMed. 1995;333:57-61.
2. Kassirer JP. The use and abuse of practice profiles. N EnglJMed. 1994:330:634-636.
3. Health Care Reform. "Report Cards" Are Useful but Significant Issues Need to Be Addressed. Washington, DC, US General Accounting Office, Health, Education, and Human Services Division; September 1994. GAO/HEHS 94-219.
4. Employers Urge Hospitals to Battle Costs Using Performance Data. Washington, DC, US General Accounting Office, Health, Education, and Human Services Division; October 1994. GAO/HEHS 95-1.
5. Iezzoni LI, Shwartz M, Restuccia J. The role of severity information in health policy debates: a survey of state and regional concerns. Inquiry. 1991;28:117-128.
6. Iezzoni LI, Greenberg LG. Widespread assessment of risk-adjusted outcomes: lessons from local initiatives. Joint Committee J Quality Improvement. 1994;20:305-316.
7. Localio AR, Hamory BH, Sharp TJ, Weaver SL, TenHave TR, Landis JR. Comparing hospital mortality in adult patients with pneumonia. A case study of statistical methods in a managed care program. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122:125132.
8. Iglehart JK. Academic medical centers enter the market: the case of Philadelphia. NEngUMed. 1995;333:1019-1023.
9. Selker HP. Systems for comparing actual and predicted mortality rates: characteristics to promote cooperation in improving hospital care. Ann Intern Med. 1993;! 18: 820-822.
10. Kassirer JP. The use and abuse of practice profiles. N E/!g//A/?rf. 1994;330:634-636.
11. McMahon LF, Bill! JE. Measurement of severity of illness and the Medicare prospective payment system: state of the art and future directions./ Gen Intern Med. 1988;3: 482-490.
12. The Quality Measurement and Management Project. The Hospital Administrator's Guide to Se\-crity Measurement Systems. Chicago, III: The Hospital Research and Educational Trust of the American Hospital Association; 1989.
13. Iezzoni LI, ed. Risk Adjustment for Measuring Health Care Outcomes. Ann Arbor, Mich: Health Administration Press; 1994.
14. All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups. Definition Manual. Wallingford, Conn: 3M Health Information Systems; 1993.
15. Edwards N, Honemann D, Burley D, Navarro M. Refinement of Medicare diagnosis-related groups to incorporate a measure of severity. Health Care Financing Re\: 1994;16:45-64.
16. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373-383.
17. Deyo RA, Gherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases./din Epidemiol. 1992;45:613-619.
18. Gonnella JS, Hornbrook MC, Louis DZ. Staging of disease: a case-mix measuremenUAMA. 1984;251:637-644.
19. Markson LE, Nash DB, Louis DZ, Gonnella JS. Clinical outcomes management and disease staging. Eval Health Professions. 1991;14:201-227.
20. Naessens JM, Leibson CL, Krishan I, Ballard DJ. Contribution of a measure of disease complexity (COMPLEX) to prediction of outcome and charges among hospitalized patients. Mayo Clin Proc. 1992;67: 1140-1149.
21. Brewster AC, Karlin BG, Hyde LA, Jacobs CM, Bradbury RC, Chae YM. MED1SGRPS: a clinically based approach to classifying hospital patients at admission. Inquiry. 1985;12:377-3S7.
22. Iezzoni LI, Moskowitz MA. A clinical assessment of MedisGroups. JAMA. 260: 3159-3163.
23. Blumberg MS. Biased estimates of expected acute myocardial infarction mortality using MedisGroups admission severity groups. JAMA.199\ ;265:2965-2970.
24. Steen PM, Brewster AC, Bradbury RC, Estabrook E, Young JA. Predicted probabilities of hospital death as a measure of admission severity of illness. Inquiry. 1993; 30:128-141.
25. Young WW, Kohler S, Kowalski J. PMC . patient severity scale: derivation and validation. Health Sen-Res. 1994;29:367-390.
26. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 19S5;13:818-S29.
27. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. An evaluation of outcome from intensive care in major medical centers.,-!/! Intern Med. 1986;104:410-418.
28. Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, et al. The APACHE III prognostic system: risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest. 1991;100: 1619-1636.
29. Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE, Draper EA. Variations in mortality and length of stay in intensive care units. Ann Intern Med. 1993;! 18:753-761.
30. Freeman JL, Fetter RB, Park H, et al. Refinement. In: Fetter RB, Brand DA, Gamache D, eds. DRGs: Their Design and Development. Ann Arbor, Mich: Health Administration Press; 1991:57-79.
31. Freeman JL, Fetter RB, Park H, et al. Diagnosis-related group refinement with diagnosis- and procedure-specific comorbidities and complications. Med Care. 1995; 33:806-827.
32. Iezzoni LI, Restuccia JD, Shwartz M, et al. The utility of severity of illness information in assessing the quality of hospital care. Med Care. 1992;30:428-444.
33. Thomas JW, Ashcraft MLF. Measuring severity of illness: six severity systems and their ability to explain cost variations. Inquiry. 1991;28:39-55.
34. MacKenzie TA, Willan AR, Lichter J, et al. Patient Classification Systems: An Evaluation of the State of the Art. Kingston, Ontario, Canada: Case Mix Research, Queens College; 1991.
35. Iezzoni LI, Shwartz M, Ash AS, Hughes JS, Daley J, Mackiernan YD. Using severity-adjusted stroke mortality rates to judge hospitals. Int 3 Qual Health Care. 1995;7: 81-94.
36. Iezzoni LI, Shwartz M, Ash AS, Hughes JS, Daley J, Mackiernan YD. Severity measurement methods and judging hospital death rates.Med Care. 1996;34:ll-28.
37. Uniform Hospital Discharge Data Minimum Data Set. Hyattsville, Md: US Dept of Health, Education and Welfare, National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics; 1980. DHEW publication PHS 80-1157.
38. Anderson G, Steinberg EP, Whittle J, Powe NR, Antebi S, Herbert R. Development of clinical and economic prognoses from Medicare claims data. JAA1A. 1990; 263:967-972.
39. Connell FA, Diehr P, Hart LG. The use of large data bases in health care studies. AnnuRe\' Public Health. 1987;8:51-74.
40. Kong D. Hiah hospital death rates. Boston Globe. Octobers, 1994:1,6,7.
41. Iezzoni LI, Shwartz M, Ash AS, et al. Evaluating Seventy Adjusters for Patient Outcome Studies. Final Report. Boston, Mass: Beth Israel Hospital; May 10, 1995. Report from Agency for Health Care Policy and Research grant R01-HSO6742.
42. Iezzoni LI, Ash AS, Shwartz M, Daley J, Hughes JS, Mackiernan YD. Predicting who dies depends on how severity is measured: implications for evaluating patient outcomes. Ann Intent Med. 1995;123: 763-770.
43. Iezzoni LI, I lotchkin EK, Ash AS, Shwartz M, Mackiernan Y. MedisGroups databases: the impact of data collection guidelines on predicting in-hospital mortality. Med Care. 1993;31:277-283.
44. Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Technical Report, Vol II, 1991. Harrisburg, Pa: Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council; February 1994.
45. Viadeck BC. Medicare hospital payment by diagnosis-related groups. Ann Intern Med. 1984;100:576-591.
46. Iezzoni LI, Burnside S, Sickles L, Moskowitz MA, Sawitz E, Levine PA. Coding of acute myocardial infarction: clinical and policy implications. Ann Intern Med. 1988; 109:745-751.
47. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.
48. Harrell FE, Lee KL, Califf RM, Pryor DB, Rosati RA. Regression modelling strategies for improved prognostic prediction. StatMed. 19S4;3:143-152.
49. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology: 19S2;143:29-36.
50. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the area under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983;148:839-843.
51. Ash AS, Shwartz M. Evaluating the performance of risk-adjustment methods: dichotomous measures. In: lezzoni LI, ed. Risk Adjustment for Measuring Health Care Outcomes. Ann Arbor, Mich: Health Administration Press, 1994:313-346.
52. Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jacknife.^/i/! Stat. 1979;7:l-26.
53. Daley J. Validity of risk-adjustment methods. In: lezzoni LI, ed. Risk Adjustment for Measuring Health Care Outcomes. Ann Arbor, Mich: Health Administration Press; 1994;239-262.
54. Iezzoni LI, Foley SM, Heeren T, et al. A method for screening the quality of hospital care using administrative data: prelimi-nary validation results. Qual Rev Bull. 1992;18:361-371.
55. Iezzoni LI, Daley J, Heeren T, et al. Identifying complications of care using administrative data. Med Care. 1994;32:700715.
56. Shapiro MF, Park RE, Keesey J, Brook RH. The effect of alternative case-mix adjustments on mortality differences between municipal and voluntary hospitals in New York City. Health Serv Res. 1994;29:95112.
57. Iezzoni LI, Foley SM, Daley J, Hughes J, Fisher ES, Heeren T. Comorbidities, complications, and coding bias. Does the number of diagnosis codes matter in predicting in-hospital mortality? JAMA. 1992;267:2197-2203.
58. Sullivan LW, Wilensky GR. Medicare Hospital Mortality Information: 7937, 19S8, 1989. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Health Care Financing Administration; 1991. HCFA publication 00720.
59. Jencks SF, Williams DK, Kay TL. Assessing hospital-associated deaths from discharge data: the role of length of stay and comorbidities.//M£4. 1988;260:2240-2246.
60. Byer MJ. Faint hearts. New York Times. March 21,1992:23.
61. Oberman L. Valuable input? Risk-adjusted data credited for better outcomes. American Medical Ne\vs. December 28, 1992.
62. Green J, Wintfeld N. Report cards on cardiac surgeons. Assessing New York state's approach. N EnglJ Med. 1995;332: 1229-1232.
63. Keeler EB, Rubenstein LV, Kahn KL, et al. Hospital characteristics and quality of czK.JAMA. 1992:268:1709-1714.
64. Kühn EM, Hartz AJ, Gottlieb MS, Rimm AA. The relationship of hospital characteristics and the results of peer review in six large states. Med Care. 1991:29:10281038.
65. Hartz AJ, Gottlieb MS, Kühn EM, Rimm AA. The relationship between adjusted hospital mortality and the results of peer review. Health Sen-Res. 1993;27:765-777.
66. Thomas JW, Holloway JJ, Guire KE. Validating risk-adjusted mortality as an indicator of quality of care. Inquiry. 1993;30: 6-22.