Efficient hybridization between Lycopersicon esculentum and L. peruvianum via 'embryo rescue' and in vitro propagation

Plant Breeding

Volumn 115, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 251-256

  Lanzhuang, Chen ^a   Adachi, Taiji ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIYAZAKI   (Japan)

Author keywords

clonal propagation; cross incompatibility; embryo rescue; interspecific hybridization; Lycopersicon esculentum; Lycopersicon peruvianum; shoot regeneration ability; somatic embryogenesis

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON PERUVIANUM;

EID: 0029910060     PISSN: 01799541     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1996.tb00912.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alexander, L. J., 1963: Transfer of a dominant type resistance to the four known Ohio pathogenic strains of tobacco mosaic virus (TMV), from Lycopersicon peruvianum to L. esculentum. Phytopathology 61, 611-617.
2. Barbano, P. P., and L. D. Topoleski, 1984: Postfertilization hybrid seed failure in Lycopersicon esculentum x Lycopersicon peruvianum ovules. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 109, 95-100.
3. Chen, L. Z., and T. Adachi, 1992a: Embryo abortion and efficient rescue in interspecific hybrids, Lycopersicon esculentum and the 'peruvianum-complex' Japan. J. Breed. 42, 65-77.
4. _, and _, 1992b: Somatic hybridization between Lycopersicon esculentum and the 'peruvianum-complex'. Proc. Asia-Pacific Agriculture Biotechnology, Beijing China, 266-267.
5. _, and , 1995: Mechanism of abortion of postfertilization hybrid embryo in interspecific backcross, Lycopersicon esculentum x (L. esculentum x L. peruvianum). Cytologia 60, 123-131.
6. _, and S Imanishi, 1991. Cross-compatibility between the cultivated tomato Lycopersicon esculentum and the wild species L. peruvianum, L. chilense assessed by ovule culture in vitro. Japan. J. Breed 41, 223-230.
7. Gradziel, T. M., and R. W. Robinson, 1989: Breakdown of self-incompatibility during pistil development in Lycopersicon peruvianum by modified bud pollination. Sex Plant. Reprod. 2, 38-42.
8. _, and _, 1991: Overcoming unilateral breeding barriers between Lycopersicon peruvianum and cultivated tomato Lycopersicon esculentum. Euphytica 54, 1-9.
9. Hille, J., M. Koornneef, M. S. Ramanna, and P. Zabel, 1989: Tomato: a crop species amenable to improvement by cellular and molecular methods. Euphytica 42, 1-23.
10. Hogenboom, N. G , 1972a: Breaking breeding barriers in Lycopersicon. I The genus Lycopersicon, its breeding barriers and the importance of breaking these barriers Euphytica 21, 221-227.
11. _, 1972b: Breaking breeding barriers in Lycopersicon. III. Inheritance of self-incompatibility in Lycopersicon peruvianum (L.) Mill. Euphytica 21, 244-256.
12. Imanishi, S., 1988: Efficient ovule culture for the hybridization of Lycopersicon esculentum and L. peruvianum, L. glandulosum. Japan. J. Breed. 38, 1-9.
13. _, and Y. Watanabe, 1988: Embryoid formation in the first backcross generation between Lycopersicon esculentum and L. grandulosum. J Yamagata Agr. For. Soc. 45, 5-7.
14. _, _, and I. Hirua, 1985: A simple and efficient method for interspecific hybridization between Lycopersicon esculentum and L peruvianum. J. Yamagata Agr. For. Soc. 42, 13-15.
15. Kinsara, A., S. N. Patnaik, E. C. Cocking, and J. B Power, 1986: Somatic hybrid plants of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. and Lycopersicon peruvianum Mill. J. Plant Physiol. 125, 225-234.
16. Koornneef, M., D. J. Hanhart, and L. Martinelli, 1987: A genetic analysis of cell culture traits in tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 74, 633-641
17. McGuire, D. C., and C. M. Rick, 1954: Self-incompatibility in species of Lycopersicon sect. Eriopersicon and hybrids with L. esculentum. Hilgardia 23, 101-124.
18. Murashige, T., and F. Skoog. 1962: A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol. Plant 15, 473-497.
19. Neal, C. A., and L. D. Topoleski, 1983: Effects of the basal medium on growth of immature tomato embryos in vitro. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 108, 434-438.
20. _, and _, 1985. Hormonal regulation of growth and development of tomato embryos in vitro. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 110, 869-873.
21. Ratushnyak, Y. I., S. A. Latypov, A. M. Samoylov, N. M. Piven, and Y. Y. Gleba, 1991: Introgressive hybridization of tomatoes by 'gamma fusion' of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. and Lycopersicon peruvianum var. dentatum Dun. protoplasts. Plant Sci. 73, 65-78.
22. Rick, C. M , 1979: Biosystematic studies in Lycopersicon and closely related species of Solanum. In: J. G. Hawkes, R. N. Lester, and A. D. Skelding (eds), The Biology and Taxonomy of the Solanaceae, 667-677. Academic Press, London.
23. Smith, P. G., 1944: Embryo culture of a tomato species hybrid. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 44, 413-416.
24. Thomas, B. R., and D. Pratt, 1981. Efficient hybridization between Lycopersicon esculentum and L. peruvianum via embryo callus. Theor Appl Genet. 59, 215-219.
25. Wijbrandi, J., A. Postthuma, J. M. Kok, R. Rijken, J. G. M. Vos, and M. Koornneef, 1990a: Asymmetric somatic hybrids between Lycopersicon esculentum and irradiated Lycopersicon peruvianum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80, 305-312.
26. _, W Van Capelle, C. J Hanhart, E. P. Van Loenen Martinet-Schuringa, and M. Koornneef, 1990b: Selection and characterization of somatic hybrids between Lycopersicon esculentum and Lycopersicon peruvianum. Plant. Sci. 70, 197-208.
27. Young, R., V. Kaul, and E. G. Williams, 1987: Clonal propagation in vitro from immature embryos and flower buds of Lycopersicon peruvianum and L esculentum. Plant. Sci. 52, 237-242.
28. Zelcer, A , 1991: The potential contribution of cell engineering to the genetic improvement of tomato. Israel J. Bot. 40, 109-113.