Selection for body composition does not affect energetic efficiency of jejunal glucose uptake in mice

Journal of Nutrition

Volumn 126, Issue 11, 1996, Pages 2861-2866

  Fan, Yang Kwang ^a,c   Croom Jr , Warren J ^a,d   Daniel, Linda R ^a   Bird, Anthony R ^a,e   Black, Betty L ^a   Eisen, Eugene J ^a   Mcbride, Brian W ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^c NATIONAL CHUNG HSING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d Department of Poultry Science ^*  (Canada)

^e CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

body composition; energetic efficiency; genetic selection; intestinal absorption; mice

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BODY DISTRIBUTION; ENERGY METABOLISM; GENETIC SELECTION; GLUCOSE TRANSPORT; JEJUNUM; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; SMALL INTESTINE ABSORPTION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BODY COMPOSITION; BODY WEIGHT; BREEDING; ENERGY METABOLISM; GLUCOSE; JEJUNUM; MALE; MICE; NA(+)-K(+)-EXCHANGING ATPASE; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; SELECTION (GENETICS);

ANIMALIA; STROPHANTHUS GRATUS;

EID: 0029909962     PISSN: 00223166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bird, A. R., Croom, W. J., Jr., Fan, Y. K., Daniel, L. R., Black, B. L., McBride, B. W., Eisen, E. J., Bull, L. S. & Taylor, I. L. (1994) Jejunal glucose absorption is enhanced by epidermal growth factor in mice. J. Nutr. 124: 231-240.
2. Croom, W. J., Jr., Bird, A. R., Black, B. L. & McBride, B. W. (1993) Manipulation of gastrointestinal nutrient delivery in livestock. J. Dairy Sci. 76: 2112-2124.
3. Eisen, E. J. (1987) Selection for components related to body composition in mice: direct responses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 74: 793-801.
4. Eisen, E. J. (1992a) Restricted index selection in mice designed to change body fat without changing body weight: direct response. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 973-980.
5. Eisen, E. J. (1992b) Restricted index selection in mice designed to change body fat without changing body weight: correlated response. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84: 307-312.
6. Eisen, E. J., Benyon, L. S. & Douglas, J. A. (1995) Long-term restricted index selection in mice designed to change fat content without changing body size. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91:340-345.
7. Eisen, E. J. & Leatherwood, J. M. (1981) Predicting percent fat in mice. Growth. 45:100-107.
8. Fan, Y. K., Croom, W. J., Jr., Black, B. L., Christensen, V. L., Eisen, E. J. & McBride, B. W. (1994) Effect of selection for growth on jejunal respiration in poults. J. Anim. Sci. 72 (suppl. 1):214.
9. Fan, Y. K., Croom, W. J., Jr., Eisen, E. J., Daniel, L. R., Black, B. L. & McBride, B. W. (1996) Selection for growth does not affect apparent energetic efficiency of jejunal glucose uptake in mice. J. Nutr. 126: 2851-2860.
10. Leclercq, B., Guy, G. & Rudeaux, F. (1989) Growth characteristics and lipid distribution in two lines of chickens selected for low or high abdominal fat. Genet. Sel. Evol. 21: 69-80.
11. +-ATPase (EC 3.6.1.3)-dependent respiration in duodenal mucosa of sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 53: 605-614.
12. Mitchell, M. A. & Smith, M. W. (1991) The effects of genetic selection for increased growth rate on mucosal and muscle weights in the different regions of the small intestine of the domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 99A: 251-258.
13. SAS Institute Inc. (1988) SAS/STAT® User's Guide (Release 6.03). SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
14. Wood, J. D., Whelehan, O. P., Ellis, M., Smith, W. C. & Laird, R. (1983) Effects on selection for low backfat thickness in pigs on the sites of tissue deposition in the body. Anim. Prod. 36: 389-397.