Reculturing science: Politics, policy, and promises to keep

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 2-12

  Chubin, Daryl E ^a  

^a NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PERCEPTION; RESEARCH FUNDING; SCIENCE POLICY; SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH;

USA;

EID: 0029907609     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/spp/23.1.2     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Nicholas C Mullins and Daryl E Chubin, "Society for social studies of science: perspectives on interdisciplinary research", in B Mar et al. Managing High Technology (Elsevier, 1985).
2. Loren Eiseley, Lost Notebooks, pages 175-179.
3. For example, see David W Breneman and Ted I K Youn (editors), Academic Labor Markets and Careers (Palmer Press, New York, 1988).
4. Daryl E Chubin, "Misinformation and the recruitment of students to science", BioScience, 40, July-August 1990, pages 524-526.
5. See Scott Freeman, "The Ph.D. shortage from the bottom up", Journal for Applied Research and Public Policy. Winter 1992.
6. For some recent crystal ball gazing, see Jon Sargent and Janet Pfleeger, "The job outlook for college graduates in the year 2000: a 1990 update", Occupational Outlook Quarterly, 34, Summer 1990, pages 3-8.
7. US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Federally Funded Research: Decisions for a Decade, OTA-SET-490 (US Government Printing Office, Washington. DC, May 1991) especially chapter 7.
8. For speculations, see Roland W Schmitt, "Universities of the future", Research-Technology Management, September-October 1989, pages 18-22; and Frank H T Rhodes, "Shaping the future: science and technology 2030", Physics Today, May 1991 .pages 42-49.
9. For speculations, see Roland W Schmitt, "Universities of the future", Research-Technology Management, September-October 1989, pages 18-22; and Frank H T Rhodes, "Shaping the future: science and technology 2030", Physics Today, May 1991 .pages 42-49.
10. This post-Sputnik legacy is recounted in US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Demographic Trends and the Scientific and Engineering Work Force (US Government Planning Office, Washington, DC, December 1985) pages 44-49.
11. US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, see reference 16. page 12. Also see "How much science is enough?", Washington Post, 24 April 1991, page A20.