Interactive urology: An evaluation

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery

Volumn 66, Issue 7, 1996, Pages 478-480

  Khadra, Mohamed H ^a   Guinea, Ana I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

computer assisted learning; evaluation; medical education; multimedia; urology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EDUCATION PROGRAM; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PROBLEM SOLVING; SURGICAL TRAINING;

EID: 0029900171     PISSN: 00048682     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1996.tb00786.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Khadra MH, Guinea AI, Hill DA. The acceptance of computer assisted learning by medical students. Aust. N.Z. J. Surg. 1995; 65: 610-12.
2. Worthen BR, Sanders JR. Educational Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. New York: Longman, 1987.
3. MacFarlane WB. Urology for the House Officer. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1988.
4. England E. Interactional analysis: The missing factor in computer aided learning design and evaluation. Educ. Technol. 1985; 25: 24-8.
5. Cobb P. Characteristics of classroom mathematics traditions: An interactional analysis. Am. Educ. Res. J. 1992; 29: 573-604.
6. Galbreath J. Multimedia, or is it hypermedia, or interactive multimedia, or ...? Educ. Technol. 1992; 23: 15-27.
7. Bell ME. The role of instructional theories in the evaluation of microcomputer courseware. Educ. Technol. 1985; 15: 36-42.
8. Kozma RB. The implications of cognitive psychology for computer-based learning tools. Educ. Technol. 1987; 27: 20-5.
9. Kozma RB. Learning with media. Rev. Educ. Res. 1991; 61: 179-211.