Effects of a class III antiarrhythmic drug and biphasic shocks on the postdefibrillation refractory period of relatively refractory myocardium

Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

Volumn 7, Issue 7, 1996, Pages 603-611

  Murakawa, Yuji ^a   Yamashita, Takeshi ^a   Ajiki, Kohsuke ^a   Sezaki, Kazunori ^a   Omata, Masao ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

biphasic shock; defibrillation; defibrillation threshold; E 4031; refractory period

Indexed keywords

1 [2 (6 METHYL 2 PYRIDYL)ETHYL] 4 (4 METHYLSULFONYLAMINOBENZOYL)PIPERIDINE; ANTIARRHYTHMIC AGENT;

ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEFIBRILLATION; DOG; HEART MUSCLE REFRACTORY PERIOD; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WAVEFORM;

EID: 0029899816     PISSN: 10453873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1996.tb00568.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Chen P-S, Shibata N, Wolf PD, et al: Activation during ventricular defibrillation in open chest dogs: Evidence of complete cessation and regeneration of ventricular fibrillation after unsuccessful shocks. J Clin Invest 1986;77:810-823.
2. Shibata N, Chen P-S, Dixon EG, et al: Epicardial activation following unsuccessful defibrillation shocks in dogs. Am J Physiol 1988;255:H902-H909.
3. Chen P-S, Wolf PD, Ideker RE: The mechanism of cardiac defibrillation: A different point of view. Circulation 1991;84:913-919.
4. Zhou X, Daubert JP, Wolf PD, et al: Epicardial mapping of ventricular defibrillation with monophasic and biphasic shocks in dogs. Circ Res 1993;72:145-160.
5. Chen PS, Wolf PD, Melnick SD, et al: Comparison of activation during ventricular fibrillation and following unsuccessful defibrillation shocks in open-chest dogs. Circ Res 1990;66:1544-1560.
6. Sweeney RJ, Gill RM, Steinberg MI, et al: Ventricular refractory period extension caused by defibrillation shocks. Circulation 1990;82:965-972.
7. Zhou X, Knisley SB, Wolf PD, et al: Prolongation of repolarization time by electric field stimulation with monophasic and biphasic shocks in open-chest dogs. Circ Res 1991;68:1761-1767.
8. Daubert JP, Frazier DW, Wolf PD, et al: Response of relatively refractory canine myocardium to monophasic and biphasic shocks. Circulation 1991;84:2522-2538.
9. Sweeney RJ, Gill RM, Reid PR: Characterization of refractory period extension by transcardiac shock. Circulation 1991;83:2057-2066.
10. Dillon SM: Optical recordings in the rabbit heart show that defibrillation strength shocks prolong the duration of depolarization and refractory period. Circ Res 1991;69:842-856.
11. Knisley SB, Smith WM, Ideker RE: Effect of field stimulation on cellular repolarization in rabbit myocardium. Implication for reentry induction. Circ Res 1992;70:707-715.
12. Dillon SM: Synchronized repolarization after defibrillation shocks. A possible component of the defibrillation process demonstrated by optical recordings in rabbit heart. Circulation 1992;85:1865-1878.
13. Dillon SM, Mehra R: Prolongation of ventricular refractoriness by defibrillation shocks may be due to additional depolarization of the action potential. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1992;3:442-457.
14. Knisley SB, Smith WM, Ideker RE: Prolongation and shortening of action potentials by electrical shocks in frog ventricular muscle. Am J Physiol 1994;266:H2348-H2358.
15. Murakawa Y, Sezaki K, Inoue H, et al: Shock-induced refractory period extension and pharmacological modulation of defibrillation threshold. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1994;23:822-825,
16. Echt DS, Black JN, Barbey JT, et al: Evaluation of antiarrhythmic drugs on defibrillation energy requirements in dogs: Sodium channel blockade and action potential prolongation. Circulation 1989;79:1106-1117.
17. Dorian P, Wang M, David I, et al: Oral clofilium produces sustained lowering of defibrillation energy requirements in a canine model. Circulation 1991;83: 614-621.
18. Dorian P, Newman D: Effect of sotalol on ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation in humans. Am J Cardiol 1993;72:72A-79A.
19. Bardy GH, Ivey TD, Allen MD, et al: A prospective randomized evaluation of biphasic versus monophasic waveform pulses on defibrillation efficacy in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989;14:728-733.
20. Winkle RA, Mead RH, Ruder MA, et al: Improved defibrillation efficacy in man with the use of a biphasic truncated exponential waveform. Am Heart J 1989; 117:122-127.
21. Dixon EG, Tang ASL, Wolf PD, et al: Improved defibrillation thresholds with large contoured epicardial electrodes and biphasic waveforms. Circulation 1987;76:1176-1184.
22. Feeser SA, Tang ASL, Kavanagh KM, et al: Strength-duration and probability of success curves for defibrillation with biphasic waveforms. Circulation 1990;82:2128-2141.
23. Tang ASL, Yabe S, Wharton JM, et al: Ventricular defibrillation using biphasic waveforms: The importance of phasic duration. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13:207-214.
24. K, by flecainide and E-4031 in cat ventricular myocytes. Circulation 1990;82:289-293.
25. Wettner E, Scholtysik G, Schaad A, et al: Effects of the new class III antiarrhythmic drug E-4031 on myocardial contractility and electrophysiologic parameters. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1991;17:480-487.
26. Lynch JJ Jr, Heaney LA, Wallace AA, et al: Suppression of lethal ischemic ventricular arrhythmias by the class III agent E4031 in a canine model of previous myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1990;15:764-775.
27. Babbs CF: Effect of pentobarbital anesthesia on ventricular defibrillation threshold in dogs. Am Heart J 1978;95:331-337.
28. Jones DL, Irish WD, Klein G: Defibrillation efficacy: Comparison of defibrillation threshold versus dose-response curve determination. Circ Res 1991;69:45-51.
29. Zipes DP, Fischer PJ, King RM, et al: Termination of ventricular fibrillation in dogs by depolarizing a critical amount of myocardium. Am J Cardiol 1975;36:37-44.
30. Frazier DW, Wolf PD, Wharton JM, et al: Stimulus-induced critical point. Mechanism for electrical initiation of reentry in normal canine myocardium. J Clin Invest 1989;83:1039-1052.
31. Davy JM, Fain ES, Dorian P, et al: The relationship between successful defibrillation and delivered energy in open-chest dogs: Reappraisal of the defibrillation threshold concept. Am Heart J 1987;113:77-84.
32. Chen PS, Wolf PD, Claydon FJ, et al: The potential gradient field created by epicardial defibrillation electrodes in dogs. Circulation 1986;74:626-636.
33. Tang AS, Wolf PD, Afework Y, et al: Three-dimensional potential gradient fields generated by intracardiac catheter and cutaneous patch electrodes. Circulation 1992;85:1857-1864.
34. Wharton JM, Wolf PD, Smith WM, et al: Cardiac potential and potential gradient fields generated by single, combined, and sequential shocks during ventricular defibrillation. Circulation 1992;85:1510-1523.
35. Tung L, Sliz N, Mulligan MR: Influence of electrical axis of the stimulation on excitation of cardiac muscle cells. Circ Res 1991;69:722-730.
36. Li HG, Jones DL, Yee R, et al: Defibrillation shocks produce different effects on Purkinje fibers and ventricular muscle: Implications for successful defibrillation, refibrillation and postshock arrhythmia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:607-614.
37. Rattes MF, Sharma AD, Klein GJ, et al: Adrenergic effects on internal cardiac defibrillation threshold. Am J Physiol 1987;253:H500-H506.
38. +concentration. J Electrocardiol 1980;13:73-78.