Aging and filtering by movement in visual search

Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 1996, Pages

  Kramer, Arthur F ^a   Martin Emerson, Robin ^a   Larish, John F ^a,c   Andersen, George J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c AT AND T LABS RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISION; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 0029895766     PISSN: 10795014     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/geronb/51B.4.P201     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Albright, T. (1992). Form-cue invariant motion processing in primate visual cortex. Science, 255, 1141-1143.
2. Ball, K., Beard, B., Roenker, D., Miller, R., & Griggs, D. (1988). Age and visual search: Expanding the useful field of view. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 5, 2210-2219.
3. Carter, J., Obler, L., Woodward, S., & Albert, M. (1983). The effect of increasing age on the latency for saccadic eye movements. Journal of Gerontology, 38, 318-320.
4. Colombo, J., Ryther, J., Frick, J., & Gifford, J. (1995). Visual pop-out in infants: Evidence for preattentive search in 3 and 4 month olds. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 266-268.
5. Czerwinski, M., Lightfoot, N., & Shiffrin, R. (1992). Automatization and training in visual search. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 271-316
6. Dehaene, S. (1989) Discriminability and dimensionality effects in visual search for featural conjunctions: A functional pop-out. Perception and Psychophysics, 46, 72-80.
7. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. (1992). Beyond the search surface: Visual search and attentional engagement. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 18, 578-588.
8. Ford, J. M., Roth, W. T., Molls, R. C., Hopkins, W. F., & Kopell, B. S. (1979) Event-related potentials recorded from young and old adults during a memory retrieval task. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 47, 450-459.
9. Gilmore, G., Tobias, T., & Royer, F. (1985). Aging and similarity grouping in visual search. Journal of Gerontology, 40, 586-592.
10. Gilmore, G., Wenk, H., Naylor, L., & Stuve, T. (1992). Motion perception and aging. Psychology and Aging, 7, 654-660.
11. Livingstone, M., & Hubel, D. (1987). Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement and depth. The Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 3416-3468.
12. Madden, D. (1987). Aging, attention, and the use of meaning in visual search. Cognitive Development, 2, 201-216.
13. McLeod, P., Driver, J., & Crisp, J. (1988). Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel. Nature, 322, 154-155.
14. McLeod, P., Driver, J., Dienes, Z., & Crisp, J. (1991). Filtering by movement in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 55-64.
15. McLeod, P., Heywood, C., Driver, J., & Zihl, J. (1989). Selective deficit of visual search in moving displays after extrastriate damage. Nature, 399, 466-467.
16. Movshon, J., & Newsome, W. (1992). Neural foundations of motion perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 35-39.
17. Muller, H., & Maxwell, J. (1994). Perceptual integration of motion and form information: Is the movement filter involved in form discrimination? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 397-420.
18. Nakayama, K., & Silverman, G. (1986). Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions. Nature, 320, 264-265.
19. Nebes, R., & Madden, D. (1983). The use of focused attention in visual search by young and old adults. Experimental Aging Research, 9, 139-143.
20. Pfefferbaum, A., Ford, J. M., Roth, W. T., & Kopell, B. S. (1980). Age differences in P3-reaction time associates. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 49, 257-265
21. Plude, D., & Hoyer, W. (1985) Attention and performance: Identifying and localizing age deficits. In N. Charness (Ed.). Aging and human performance (pp 47-99). London: Wiley.
22. Plude, D., & Hoyer, W. (1986) Aging and the selectivity of visual information processing Psychology and Aging, 1, 1-16.
23. Plude, D., & Doussard-Roosevelt, J. (1989). Aging, selective attention, and feature integration. Psychology and Aging, 4, 98-105.
24. Quinlan, P., & Humphreys, G. (1987). Visual search for targets defined by combinations of color, shape, and size: An examination of the task constraints on feature and conjunction searches. Perception and Psychophysics, 41, 455-472.
25. Rabbitt, P. (1965). An age-decrement in the ability to ignore irrelevant information Journal of Gerontology, 20, 233-236.
26. Rogers, W., & Fisk, A. (1991) Are age differences, in consistent-mapping visual search due to feature learning or attention training? Psychology and Aging, 4, 542-550.
27. Schieber, F., Hins, E., White, J., Williams, M., & Brannan, J. (1990). Assessing age-differences in motion perception using simple oscillatory displacement versus random dot cinematography. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Supplement), 31, 355.
28. Schneider, W. (1985). Toward a model of attention and the development of automatic processing. In M. Posner & O. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp 475-492). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Scialfa, C., Kline, D., & Lyman, B. (1987) Age differences in target identification as a function of retinal location and noise level: Examination of the useful field of view. Psychology and Aging, 2, 14-19.
30. Scialfa, C., Thomas, D., & Joffe, K. (1994). Age differences in the useful field of view: An eye movement analysis. Optometry and Vision Science, 71, 736-742.
31. Sekuler, R., & Ball, K. (1986). Visual localization: Age and practice. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 3, 864-867.
32. Spear, P. (1993). Neural bases of visual deficits during aging. Vision Research, 33, 2589-2609.
33. Steinman, S. (1987) Serial and parallel search in pattern vision. Perception, 16, 389-399.
34. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
35. Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48.
36. Treisman, A., & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 459-468.
37. Treisman, A., Viera, A., & Hayes, A. (1992). Automaticity and preattentive processing. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 341-362.
38. Trick, G., & Silverman, S. (1991). Visual sensitivity to motion: Age-related changes and deficits in senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neurology, 41, 1437-1440.
39. Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. Psychologische Forschung, 4, 301-350.
40. Wolfe, J. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202-238.
41. Wolfe, J., Cave, K., & Franzel, S. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419-433.
42. Zacks, J., & Zacks, R. (1993). Visual search times assessed without reaction times: A new method and an application to aging. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 798-813.