Measuring activities of daily living among haemophiliacs

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 217-223

  Iwata, N ^a   Hachisuka, K ^b   Tanaka, S ^b   Naka, Y ^b   Ogata, H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH   (Japan)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Activities of daily living; Haemophilia

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DETERIORATION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; HEMARTHROSIS; HEMOPHILIA; HUMAN; LEG MOVEMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0029895060     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638289609166304     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: Barthel index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 1965; 14: 61-65.
2. Granger CV, Dewis LS, Peters NC, Sherwood CC, Barrett JE. Stroke rehabilitation: analysis of repeated Barthel index measures. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1979; 60: 14-17.
3. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Pollard WE, Martin DP, Gilson BS. The sickness impact profile: validation of a health status measure. Medical Care, 1976; 14: 57-67.
4. Jette AM. Functional status instrument: reliability of a chronic disease evaluation instrument. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1980; 61: 395-401.
5. Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 1980; 23: 137-145.
6. Meenan RF, Gertman PM, Mason JH. Measuring health status in arthritis: the arthritis impact measurement scales. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 1980; 23: 146-152.
7. Hattori I, Hosokawa T, Wasai Y. The Principles and Practice of Medical Rehabilitation, 1st edn. Tokyo: Igaku-Shoin, 1974 [In Japanese].
8. Hendrickson AE, White PO. Promax: a quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1964; 17: 65-70.
9. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 1951; 16: 297-334.
10. SAS Institute. SAS User's Guide, 5th edn. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute, 1985.
11. Guttman L. Some necessary conditions for common factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1954; 18: 149-162.
12. Kaiser HF. A note on Guttman's lower bound for the number of common factors. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1961; 14: 1-2.
13. Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
14. Kline P. A Handbook of Test Construction. London: Methuen, 1986.
15. Feinstein AR, Josephy BR, Wells CK. Scientific and clinical problems in indexes of functional disability. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1986; 105: 413-420.
16. Merbitz C, Morris J, Grip JC. Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1989; 70: 308-312.
17. Kaufert JM. Functional ability indices: measurement problems in assessing their validity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1983; 64: 260-267.
18. Law M, Letts L. A critical review of scales of activities of daily living. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1989; 43: 522-528.
19. Affleck JW, Aitken RCB, Hunter JAA, McGuire RJ, Roy CW. Rehabilitation status: a measure of medicosocial dysfunction. Lancet, 1988; i: 230-233.
20. Millard RW. The functional assessment screening questionnaire: application for evaluating pain-related disability. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1989; 70: 303-307.
21. Mangione CM, Phillips RS, Seddon JM, et al. Development of the 'activities of daily vision scale': a measure of visual functional status. Medical Care, 1992; 30: 1111-1126.
22. Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Roach KE. The foot function index: a measure of foot pain and disability. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991; 44: 561-570.
23. Logan FA, Maclean A, Howie CA, Gibson B, Hann IM, Parry-Jones WL. Psychological disturbance in children with haemophilia. British Medical Journal, 1990; 301: 1253-1256.