On the equivalence of collectively and individually collected responses: Standard-gamble and time-tradeoff judgments of health states

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 120-132

  Krabbe, Paul F M ^a   Essink Bot, Marie Louise ^b   Bonsel, Gouke J ^b  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b NONE

Author keywords

collective judgment; EuroQol; generalizability theory; methodology; standard gamble; time tradeoff; voting system

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEALTH STATUS; INDIVIDUALIZATION; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; METHODOLOGY; TEAMWORK;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; NETHERLANDS; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); SOCIAL VALUES;

EID: 0029891993     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9601600204     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Hout B van, Bonsel G, Habbema D, van der Maas P. Heart transplantation in The Netherlands; costs, effects and scenarios. J Health Econ. 1993;12:73-93.
2. Williams A. Economics of coronary artery bypass grafting. Br Med J. 1985;291:326-9.
3. Hout BA van, Wielink G, Bonsel GJ, Rutten FFH. Effects of ACE-inhibitors on heart failure in The Netherlands. A pharmacoeconomic model. Pharmacoeconomics. 1993;3:387-97.
4. The World Bank. World Development Report 1993: Investing in Health. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 1993.
5. Loomes G, McKenzie L. The use of QALYs in health care decision making. Soc Sci Med. 1989;28:299-308.
6. Hilden J. The nonexistence of interpersonal utility scales: a missing link in medical decision theory? Med Decis Making. 1985;5:215-28.
7. The EuroQol Group. EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16:199-208.
8. Essink-Bot ML, Stouthard MEA, Bonsel GJ. Generalizability of valuation on health states collected with the EuroQol questionnaire. Health Econ. 1993;2:237-46.
9. Essink-Bot ML, Bonsel GJ, van der Maas PJ. Valuation of health states by the general public: feasibility of a standardized measurement procedure. Soc Sci Med. 1990;11:1201-6.
10. Brooks RG, Jendteg S, Lindgren B, Persson U, Björk S. EuroQol: health-related quality of life measurement. Results of the Swedish questionnaire exercise. Health Policy. 1991;18:37-48.
11. Nord E. EuroQol: health-related quality of life measurement Valuations of health states by the general public in Norway. Health Policy. 1991;18:25-36.
12. EuroQol Conference Proceedings, 1991. Björk S, ed. IHE Working Paper. Lund, Sweden: Institute for Health Economics, 1992.
13. Agt HME, Essink-Bot ML, Krabbe PFM, Bonsel, GJ. Test-retest reliability of health state valuations collected with the EuroQol questionnaire. Soc Sci Med. 1994;11:1537-44.
14. von Busschhach JJ, Hessing DJ, de Charro FTh. An empirical comparison of four measurements of quality of life: standard gamble, time trade-off, the EuroQol-visual analogue scale and the Rosser & Kind matrix. In: Sintonen H, ed. EuroQol Conference Proceedings, 1992. Helsinki, Finland: Kuopio University Publications, 1993.
15. von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1953.
16. Torrance GW, Thomas WH, Sackett DI. A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs. Health Serv Res. 1972;2:118-33.
17. Torrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal: a review. J Health Econ. 1986;5:1-30.
18. Torrance GW. Social preferences for health states: an empirical evaluation of three measurement techniques. Socio Econ Plan Sci. 1976;10:129-36.
19. Patrick DL, Starks HE, Cain KC, Uhlmann RF, Pearlman RA. Measuring preferences for health states worse than death. Med Decis Making. 1994;14:9-18.
20. Llewellyn-Thomas H, Sutherland HJ, Tibshirani R, Ciampi A, Till JE, Boyd NF. The measurement of patients' values in medicine. Med Decis Making. 1982;2:449-62.
21. Weinstein MC, Fineberg HV, Elstein AS, et al. Clinical Decision Analysis. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders, 1980.
22. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Academic Press, 1977.
23. Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures: statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials. 1991;12:142S-158S.
24. Shavelson RJ, Webb NM, Rowley GL. Generalizability theory. Am Psychol. 1989;6:922-32.
25. Crocker L, Algina J. Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston, 1986.
26. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurements scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 1989.
27. BMDP Statistical Software. BMDP Statistical Software Manual, release 7.0. Dixon WJ, ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1992.
28. Wakker P, Stiggelbout A. Explaining distortions in utility elicitation through the rank-dependent model for risky choices. Med Decis Making. 1995;15:180-6.
29. Wolfson AD, Sinclair AJ, Bombardier CB, McGeer A. Preference measurements for functional status in stroke patients: interrater and intertechnique comparisons. In: Kane RL, Kane R, eds. Values and Long-term Care. Toronto, Ont., Canada: Lexington Books, 1982.
30. Read JL, Quinn RJ, Berwick DM, Fineberg HV, Weinstein MC. Preferences for health outcomes: comparison of assessment methods. Med Decis Making. 1984;3:315-29.
31. Hornberger JC, Redelmeier DA, Petersen J. Variability among methods to assess patients' well-being and consequent effect on a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Clin Epidemiol, 1992;5:505-12.
32. Froberg DG, Kane RL. Methodology for measuring health-state preferences - II: Scaling methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;5:459-71.
33. Stevens SS. On the theory of scales of measurement. Science. 1946:103:677-80.