Evaluation of a conical mill for screening of direct compression formulations

Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 417-430

  Bauer Brandl, A ^a   Becker, D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b CIBA GEIGY LTD   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LACTOSE; MICROCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE;

ARTICLE; DRUG CONTROL; DRUG MANUFACTURE; INSTRUMENT; TABLET;

EID: 0029891285     PISSN: 03639045     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/03639049609069350     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. J. J. Motzi and N. R. Anderson, The quantitative evaluation of a granulation milling process. II. Effect of output screen size, mill speed and impeller shape, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 10, 713-728 (1984).
2. J. J. Motzi and N. R. Anderson, The quantitative evaluation of a granulation milling process. III. Prediction of output particle size, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 10, 915-928 (1984).
3. G. L. Fourman, D. L. Cunningham, R. L. Gerteisen, J. F. Glasscock, and R. P. Poska, Improved color uniformity in tablets made by the direct compression method: A case study, Pharm. Technol., 14, 34-44 (1990).
4. R. P. Poska, T. R. Hill, and J. W. van Schaik, The use of statistical indices to gauge the mixing efficiency of a conical screening mill, Pharm. Res., 10, 1248-1251 (1993).
5. H. Hess, M. C. R. Johnson, and W. Loewe, Mischversuche mit nieder dosierten Wirkstoffen und verschiedenen Exzipientien, Acta Pharm. Technol., 21, 245-254 (1975).
6. G. Steiner, M. Patel, and J. T. Carstensen, Effects of milling on granulation particle size distribution, J. Pharm. Sci., 63, 1395 (1974).
7. J. J. Motzi and N. R. Andersen, The quantitative evaluation of a granulation milling process. I. Algebraic method for particle size analysis, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 10, 225-239 (1984).
8. B. R. Hajratwala, Particle size reduction by a hammer mill. I. Effect of output screen size, feed particle size and mill speed, J. Pharm. Sci., 71, 188-190 (1982).