Reproducibility of a new method to determine cough-induced leak-point pressure in women with stress urinary incontinence

International Urogynecology Journal

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 13-19

  Siltberg, H ^a   Larsson, G ^a   Victor, A ^a,b  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b MEDICAL PRODUCTS AGENCY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Female; Leak point pressure; Reproducibility; Stress incontinence; Urodynamics

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL PRESSURE; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION FUNCTION; COUGHING; FEMALE; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; STRESS INCONTINENCE; TECHNIQUE; URINE INCONTINENCE; URODYNAMICS;

EID: 0029890093     PISSN: 09373462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF01895097     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Abrams P, Blaivas JG, Stanton SL, Andersen JT. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Sound J Urol Nephrol Suppl 1988;114:15-19
2. Richardson DA. Value of the cough pressure profile in the evaluation of patients with stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986;155:808-811
3. Versi E. Discriminant analysis of urethral pressure profilometry data for diagnosis of genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1990;97:251-259.
4. Scotti RJ, Myers DL. A comparison of the cough stress test and single-channel cystometry with multichannel urodynamic evaluation in genuine stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1993;81:430-433.
5. Enhörning G. Simultaneous recording of intravesical and intraurethral pressure. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 1961;276:1-68
6. Richardson DA, Ramahi A. Reproducibility of pressure transmission ratios in stress incontinent women. Neurourol Urodyn 1993;12:123-130
7. Bump RC, Fantl JA, Hurt WG. Dynamic urethral pressure profilometry pressure transmission ratio determinations after continence surgery: understanding the mechanism of success, failure, and complications. Obstet Gynecol 1988;72:870-874.
8. Rosenzweig BA, Bathia NN, Nelson AL. Dynamic urethral pressure profilometry pressure transmission ratios: what do the numbers really mean? Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:586-590.
9. Eriksen BC, Hagen B, Eik-Nes SH, Molne K, Miølnerød OK, Romslo I. Long-term effectiveness of the Burch colposuspension in female urinary stress incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1990;69:45-50
10. Herbertsson G, Iosif CS. Surgical results and urodynamic studies 10 years after retropubic colpourethrocystopexy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1993;72:298-301
11. Lose G, Rosenkilde P, Gammelgaard J, Schroeder T. Padweighing test performed with standardized bladder volume. Urology 1988;XXXII: 78-80
12. Fantl JA, Harkins SW, Wyman JF, Choi SC, Taylor JR. Fluid loss quantitation test in women with urinary incontinence: a test-retest analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1987;70:739-743
13. Thind P, Gerstenberg TC. One-hour ward test vs. 24-hour home pad weighing test in the diagnosis of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 1991;10:241-245
14. Victor A, Larsson G, Åsbrink A-S. A simple patient-administered test for objective quantification of the symptoms of urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1987;21:277-279
15. Lose G, Jørgensen L, Thunedborg P. 24-hour home pad weighing test versus 1-hour ward test in the assessment of mild stress incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1989;68:211-215
16. McGuire EJ, Woodside JR, Borden TA, Weiss RM. Prognostic value of urodynamic testing in myelodysplastic patients. J Urol 1981;126:205-209
17. Wan J, McGuire EJ, Bloom DA, Ritchey ML. The treatment of urinary incontinence in children using glutaraldehyde cross-linked collagen. J Urol 1992;148:127-130
18. McGuire EJ, Fitzpatrick CC, Wan J et al. Clinical assessment of urethral sphincter function. J Urol 1993;150:1452-1454
19. Richardson DA. Use of vaginal pressure measurements in urodynamic testing. Obstet Gynecol 1985;66:581-584
20. Plevnik S, Vrtacnik P, Janez J. Detection of fluid entry into the urethra by electric impedence measurement: electric fluid bridge test. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 1983;4:309-313
21. Mayne CJ, Hilton P. The distal urethral electrical conductance test: standardisation of method and clinical reliability. Neurourol Urodyn 1988;7:55-60
22. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;327:307-310
23. Snedecor GW. Queries. Biometrics 1952;8:85-86
24. Abraham GE, Swerdloff R, Tulchinsky D, Odell WD. Radioimmunoassay of plasma progesterone. J Clin Endocrinol 1971;32:619-624
25. Decter RM, Harpster L. Pitfalls in determination of leak point pressure. J Urol 1992;148:588-591
26. Miklos J, Sze EHM, Karram MM. A critical appraisal of the methods of measuring leak-point pressures in women with stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:349-352
27. Bump RC, Elser DM, Theofrastous JP, McClish DK. Valsalva leak point pressures in women with genuine stress incontinence: reproducibility, effect of catheter caliber, and correlations with other measures of urethral resistance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:551-557
28. Bump RC, W E Copeland J, Hurt WG, Fantl JA. Dynamic urethral pressure/profilometry pressure transmission ratio determinations in stress-incontinent and stress-continent subjects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;159:749-754
29. Hilton P, Stanton SL. Urethral pressure measurements by microtransducer: the results in symptom-free women and in those with genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1983;90:919-933
30. Swift SE, Ostergard DR. A comparison of stress leak-point pressure and maximal urethral closure pressure in patients with genuine stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:704-708
31. Song JT, Rozanski TA, Belville WD. Stress leak point pressure: a simple and reproducible method utilizing a fiberoptic microtransducer. Urology 1995;46:81-84