Reliability and changes in validity of self-reported cardiovascular disease risk factors using dual response: The behavioral risk factor survey

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 511-517

  Bowlin, Steven J ^a   Morrill, Barbara D ^b   Nafziger, Anne N ^b   Lewis, Carol ^b   Pearson, Thomas A ^b,c  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b BASSETT MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiovascular disease; Reliability; Risk factors; Survey methods; Telephone; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CIGARETTE SMOKING; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA; HYPERTENSION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LABORATORY TEST; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OBESITY; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PREVALENCE; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; RISK FACTOR; SELF REPORT; TECHNIQUE; TELEPHONE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0029886345     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(96)00010-8     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Remington PL, Smith MY, Williamson DF, et al. Design, characteristics, and usefulness of state-based behavioral risk factor surveillance; 1981-87. Pub Health Rep 1988; 103: 366-375.
2. Gentry EM, Kalsbeek WD, Hogelin GC, et al. The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveys. II. Design, methods and estimates from combined state data. Am J Prev Med 1985; 1: 9-14.
3. Bowlin SJ, Morrill BD, Nafziger AN, et al. Validity of cardiovascular disease risk factors assessed by telephone survey: The Behavioral Risk Factor Survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 561-571.
4. Lord FM, Novick MR. Statistical Theories of Mental Tests. Addison-Welsey, Reading, Massachusetts, 1968.
5. Kelsey JL, Thompson WD, Evans AS. Measurement 1: Questionnaires. In: Methods in Observational Epidemiology. Oxford University Press, New York, 1986, pp. 309-336.
6. Marshall JR, Graham S. Use of dual responses to increase validity of case-control studies. J Chron Dis 1984; 37: 125-136.
7. Farquhar J, Fortmann S, Wood P, et al. Community studies of cardiovascular disease prevention. In: Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease (Kaplan N, Stanley J, eds.). W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1983, pp. 170-181.
8. Waksberg J. Sampling methods for random digit dialing. J Am Stat Assoc 1978; 73: 40-46.
9. Jarvis MJ, Tunstall-Pedoe H, Feyerabend C, Vesey C, Saloojee Y. Comparison of tests used to distinguish smokers from nonsmokers. Am J Public Health 1987; 77: 1435-1438.
10. American Heart Association. High Blood Pressure Program Module and Training Guide. American Heart Association, New York State Affiliate, New York, 1986.
11. The fifth report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC V). Arch Intern Med 1993; 153: 154-183.
12. National Diabetes Data Group. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. Diabetes 1979; 28: 1039-1057.
13. Summary of the second report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel II). JAMA 1993; 269: 3015-3023.
14. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960; 20: 37-46.
15. Fleiss JL. The measurement of interrater agreement. In: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportion, 2nd Ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1981, pp. 211-236.
16. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420-428.
17. Kelsey JL, Thompson WD, Evans AS. Measurement error. In: Methods in Observational Epidemiology. Oxford University Press, New York, 1986, pp. 285-308.
18. Marshall JR, Graham S. Use of dual response to increase validity of case-control studies. J Chron Dis 1984; 37: 125-136.
19. Shea S, Stein AD, Lantiqua R, et al. Reliability of the behavioral risk Factor Survey in a triethnic population. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 133: 489-500.