Quality assessment and control in the intensive care unit

Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 134-138

  Frutiger, Adrian ^a  

^a Interdisc Intensive Care Unit   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISEASE SEVERITY; INTENSIVE CARE; MORTALITY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; QUALITY OF LIFE; REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0029885561     PISSN: 09527907     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001503-199604000-00003     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Bion J: Rationing intensive care. BMJ 1995, 310:682-683.
2. Durand-Zaleski I: Estimating the cost of intensive care. Intensive Care Med 1994, 20:538-539.
3. Donabedian A: The quality of care: how can it be assessed? JAMA 1988, 260:1743-1748.
4. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT: Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet 1993, 342:1317-1322.
5. MacPherson D, Mann T: Medical audit and quality of core - a new English initiative. Qual Assur Health Care 1992, 4:89-95.
6. Booth FV: ABCs of quality assurance. Crit Care Clin 1993, 9:477-489.
7. Wedel S, Warren J, Harvey M, Biel MH, Dennis R: Guidelines for intensive care unit design. Crit Care Med 1995, 23:581-588. This publication sums up the official views of the American College of Critical Care Medicine regarding structural standards of ICUs. Unit sizes of 8-12 beds are suggested. Whereas design and equipment are described in detail, staffing is not addressed.
8. Zimmerman JE, Rousseau DM, Duffy J, Devers K, Gillies RR, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Shortell SM, Knaus WA: Intensive care at two teaching hospitals: an organizational case study. Am J Crit Care 1994, 3:129-138.
9. Rafkins HS, Hoyt JW: Objective data and quality assurance programs. Current and future trends. Crit Care Clin 1994, 10:157-177.
10. Hunninghake GW, Mark JD, Rainey TG, Fish JE: Workforce needs and training in pulmonary and/or critical care medicine. Crit Care Med 1995, 23:623-624.
11. Snyder JV, Sirio CA, Angus DC, Haravnak MT, Robert SN, Sing EH, Rudy EB: Trial of nurse practitioners in intensive care. New Horiz 1994, 2:296-304.
12. Brennan TA, Hebert LE, Laird NM, Lawtheers A, Thorpe KE, Leape LL, Localio R, Lipsitz SR, Newhouse JP, Weiler PC, Hiatt HH: Hospital characteristics associated with adverse events and substandard care. JAMA 1991, 265:3265-3269.
13. Pierpont GL, Thilgen D: Effect of computerized charting on nursing activity in intensive care. Crit Care Med 1995, 23:1067-1073. The introduction of a PDMS in a coronary care unit reduced the time nurses spent on data gathering and charting (10% reduction) but brought the new task of working at a terminal (10% increase). Computerized records cannot be expected to necessarily provide extra nursing time.
14. Kari A: Information systems for intensive care are ready - are we? Intensive Care Med 1995, 21:701-702.
15. Donchin Y, Gopher D, Oolin M, Badihi Y, Biesky M, Sprung CL, Pizov R, Cotev S: A look into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1995, 23:294-300. This important study looked at occurrence and severity of human-induced adverse events ('errors') as an indicator for process quality. Occurrence was 1.7 adverse events per patient day or two potentially detrimental incidents per day for the whole unit. Nurses and physicians contributed equally and in 37% of the events insufficient communication between the two professions was involved.
16. Bates DW, Leape LL, Petrycki S: Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events in hospitalized adults. J Gen Int Med 1993, 8:289-294.
17. Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, Lawthers AG, Localio JD, Barnes BA, Herbert L, Newhouse JP, Weiler PC, Hiatt H: The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med 1991, 324:377-384.
18. Hart GK, Baldwin I, Gutteridge G, Ford J: Adverse incident reporting in intensive care. Anaesth Intensive Care 1994, 22:556-561. The authors report 390 incidents, 106 of which were harmful. Anonymous voluntary reporting was used and reporting frequency varied considerably. Incidence monitoring as a continuous routine and closing the loop by regularly taking corrective action was applied successfully.
19. Sprung CL, Eidelman LA, Steinberg A: Is the physician's duty to the individual patient or to society? Crit Care Med 1995, 23:618-620.
20. Emanuel LL: Advance directive: do they work? J Am Coll Cardiol 1995, 25:35-38.
21. Johnson RF, Baranowski-Birkmeier T, O'Donnell JB: Advance directive in the medical intensive care unit of a community teaching hospital. Chest 1995, 107:751-756. This study looked at the impact of the Patient Self-Determination Act passed by US Congress in 1990. Only around 10% of admitted patients presented with advance directives and there was no difference before and after introduction of the new legislation. Advance directives were rarely available and had little influence on patient care and resource usage.
22. Granger CE, George C, Shelly MP: The management of bereavement on intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 1995, 21:429-436.
23. Shortell SM, Zimmerman JE, Rousseau DM, Gillies RR, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Knaus WA, Duffy J: The performance of intensive care units: does good management make a difference? Med Care 1994, 32:508-525.
24. Vincent JL, Bihari DJ, Suter PM, Bruining HA, White J, Nicolas-Chanoin MH, Wolff M, Spencer RC, Hemmer M, for the EPIC International Advisory Committee: The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe. JAMA 1995, 274:639-644. A large prevalence study of nosocomial infections with an original design. Infections importantly contribute to ICU mortality and ranged from 10 to 32% in the different countries. Infection prevention must become part of process quality in ICUs and the findings of this study should be used as reference point to monitor progress.
25. Widmer AF: Infection control and prevention strategies in the ICU. Intensive Care Med 1994, 20(suppl 4):7-11.
26. Jarvis WK: Handwashing. The Semmelweis lesson forgotten? Lancet 1994, 344:1311-1312.
27. Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Knaus WA: Improving intensive care unit discharge decision: supplementing physician judgment with predictions of next day risk for life support. Crit Care Med 1994, 22:1373-1384. The authors suggest a combination of APACHE III and TISS (Therapeutic Intervention Severity Score) to calculate the probability that a patient will need active ICU treatment on the next day. Even if the discharges were not actually performed as suggested by these calculations, such models might provide helpful additional information for ICU discharge decisions.
28. Hyzy RC: ICU scoring and clinical decision making. Chest 1995, 107:1482-1483.
29. Beards SC, Edwards JD, Nightingale P: The need for quality control in measurement of mixed venous oxygen saturation. Anaesthesia 1994, 49:886-888.
30. Omalley MK, Rhame FS, Cerra FB, Mccomb RC: Value of routine pressure monitoring system changes after 72 hours of continuous use. Crit Care Med 1994, 22:1424-1430.
31. Iberti TJ, Daily EK, Leibowitz AB, Schecter CB, Fischer EP, Silverstein JH, Albertson TE, Cerra FB, Connors AF, Halpern NA, et al.: Assessment of critical care nurses' knowledge of the pulmonary artery catheter. Crit Care Med 1994, 22:1674-1678.
32. Oakley PA: The need for standards for inter-hospital transfer. Anaesthesia 1994, 49:505-566.
33. Maguire GP, DeLorenzo LJ, Moggio RA: Unplanned extubation in the intensive care unit: a quality-of-care concern. Crit Care Nurs Q 1994, 17:40-47.
34. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F, and the International Multicenter Study Group: A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 1993, 270:2957-2963.
35. Becker RB, Zimmerman JE, Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Seneff MG, Draper EA, Higgins TL, Estafanous FG, Loop FD: The use of APACHE III to evaluate ICU length of stay, resource use, and mortality after coronary artery by-pass surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg 1995, 36:1-11.
36. Lemeshow S, Teres D, Klar J, Avrunin JS, Gehlbach SH, Rapoport J: Mortality Probability Models (MPMII) based on an international cohort of intensive care unit patients. JAMA 1993, 270:2478-2486.
37. Lemeshow S, Klar J, Teres D: Outcome prediction for individual intensive care patients: useful misused, or abused? Intensive Care Med 1995, 21:770-776. This review specifies when outcome prediction and severity scores can be used meaningfully. One field is quality assessment of ICU performance, in which either different units can be compared or single units can be followed over an extended time.
38. Wong DT, Crofts SL, Gomez M, Mcguire GP, Byrick RJ: Evaluation of predictive ability of APACHE II system and hospital outcome in Canadian intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 1995, 23:1177-1183.
39. Féry-Lemonnier E, Landais P, Loirat P, Kleinknecht D, Brivet F: Evaluation of severity scoring systems in ICUs-translation, conversion and definition ambiguities as a source of interobserver variability in Apache II, SAPS and OSF. Intensive Care Med 1995, 21:356-360. The authors raise important questions about interobserver variability in the application of physiological scores.
40. Petros AJ, Marshall JC, Vansaene HKF: Should morbidity replace mortality as an endpoint for clinical trials in intensive care? Lancet 1995, 345:369-371. ICU mortality has remained about the same over the years. The authors therefore argue that effects of new therapies should be evaluated by measuring morbidity with appropriate scores rather than always looking at mortality.
41. Karetzky M, Zubair M, Parikh J: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in intensive care unit and non-intensive care unit patients: immediate and long-term survival. Arch Intern Med 1995, 155:1277-1280.
42. Chelluri L, Grenvik A, Silverman M: Intensive care for critically ill elderly: mortality costs, and quality of life: review of the literature. Arch Intern Med 1995, 155:1012-1022.
43. Wu AW, Damiano AM, Lynn J, Alzola C, Teno J, Landefield CS, Desbiens N, Tsevat J, Mayeroakes A, Harrell FE, Knaus WA: Predicting future functional status for seriously ill hospitalized adults - the SUPPORT prognostic model. Ann Intern Med 1995, 122:342-350.
44. McDowell J, Newell C: Measuring health, a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1987.
45. Kerridge RK, Glasziou PP, Hillman KM: The use of 'quality-adjusted life years' (QALYs) to evaluate treatment in intensive care. Anaesth Intensive Care 1995, 23:322-331. This work attempts to use QALYs for assessing outcome of ICU survivors. Apart from structured chronic health scores, the patient's own perception of his or her quality of life was looked at. The authors show that quantification of outcome in ICU survivors is feasible.
46. Tian ZM, Miranda DR: Quality of life after intensive care with the sickness impact profile. Intensive Care Med 1995, 21:422-428. For the first time the Sickness Impact Profile has been used for a large number of ICU patients. It combines physical status with psychosocial elements.
47. Landefeld CS, Palmer RM, Kresevic DM, Fortinsky RH, Kowal J: A randomized trial of care in a hospital medical unit especially designed to improve the functional outcomes of acutely ill older patients. N Engl J Med 1995, 332:1338-1344.
48. Rosenthal GE, Harper DL: Cleveland health quality choice: a model for collaborative community-based outcomes assessment. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 1994, 20:425-442.
49. Lau F: A clinical decision support system prototype for cardiovascular intensive care. Int J Clin Monit Comput 1994, 11:157-169.
50. Hope AT, Plenderleith JL: The Riyadh Intensive Care Program mortality prediction algorithm assessed in 617 intensive care patients in Glasgow. Anaesthesia 1995, 50:103-107.
51. Tsevat J, Cook EF, Green ML, Matchar DB, Dawson NV, Broste SK, Wu AW, Phillips RS, Oye RK, Goldman L: Health values of the seriously ill. Ann Intern Med 1995, 122:514-520. A prospective investigation of 1438 seriously ill patients. The patients' health values varied widely, but were usually higher than their families believed.
52. Gill TM, Feinstein AR: A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. JAMA 1994, 272:619-626. The authors review a large number of quality of life scores and deplore the missing inclusion of the patients' personal perceptions. They recommend that existing instruments be replaced or at least supplemented by the patients' opinions.