Influence of stenotic lesion morphology on immediate and long-term (6 months) angiographic outcome: Comparative analysis of directional coronary atherectomy versus standard balloon angioplasty

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 543-551

  Kimball, Brian P ^a,b   Cohen, Eric A ^a   Adelman, Allan G ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b TORONTO GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATHERECTOMY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORPHOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;

EID: 0029879107     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00511-0     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bourassa MG, Alderman EL, Bertrand M, et al. Report of the joint ISFC/WHO task force on coronary angioplasty: special report. Circulation 1988;78:780-9.
2. Serruys PW, Luijten HE, Beatt KJ, et al. Incidence of restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty; a time related phenomenon: a quantitative angiographic study in 342 consecutive patients at 1, 2, 3, and 4 months. Circulation 1988;77:361-71.
3. Nobuyoshi M, Kimura T, Nosaka H, et al. Restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: serial angiographic follow-up of 229 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;12:616-23.
4. Haude M, Erbel R, Straub U, Dietz U, Meyer J. Short and long term results after intracoronary stenting in human coronary arteries: monocentre experience with the balloon expandable Palmaz-Schatz stent. Br Heart J 1991; 66:337-45.
5. Stertzer SH, Rosenblum J, Shaw RE. et al. Coronary rotational ablation: initial experience in 302 procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:287-95.
6. Bittl JA, Sanborn TA, Tcheng JE, Siegel RM, Ellis SG. Clinical success, complications and restenosis rates with excimer laser coronary angioplasty: the Percutaneous Excimer Laser Coronary Angioplasty Registry. Am J Cardiol 1990;119:237-41.
7. Hinohara T, Selmon MR, Robertson GC, Braden L, Simpson JS. Directional atherectomy: new approaches for treatment of obstructive coronary and peripheral vascular disease. Circulation 1990;81 Suppl IV:IV-79-91.
8. Baim DS, Hinohara T, Holmes D, et al. Results of directional coronary atherectomy during multicenter preapproval testing. Am J Cardiol 1993;72 Suppl E:6E-11E.
9. Adelman AG, Cohen EA, Kimball BP, et al. A comparison of directional atherectomy with balloon angioplasty for lesions of the left anterior descending coronary artery. N Engl J Med 1993;329:228-33.
10. Topol EJ, Leya F, Pinkerton CA, et al, for the CAVEAT Study Group. A comparison of directional atherectomy with coronary angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1993;329:221-7.
11. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Gradient of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975;51:7-40.
12. Ellis SG, Rouhin GS, King SB III, et al. Angiographic and clinical predictors of acute closure after native vessel coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1988: 77:372-9.
13. Bresnahan DR, Davis JL, Holmes DR Jr, Smith HC. Angiographic occurrence and clinical correlates of intraluminal coronary artery thrombus: role of unstable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;6:285-9.
14. Lesperance J, Hudon G, White CW, Laurier J, Waters D. Comparison by quantitative angiographic assessment of coronary stenoses of one view showing the severest narrowing to two orthogonal views. Am J Cardiol 1989;64:462-5.
15. Van der Zwet PM, Pinto IM, Serruys PW, Reiber JH. A new approach for the automated definition of path lines in digitized coronary angiograms. Int J Card Imag 1990;5:75-83.
16. Di Mario C, Haase J, Den Boer A, Reiber JH, Serruys PW. Edge detection versus densitometry in the quantitative assessment of stenosis phantoms: an in vivo comparison in porcine coronary arteries. Am Heart J 1992;124: 1181-9.
17. Haase J, Di Mario C, Slager CJ, et al. In-vivo validation of on-line and off-line geometric coronary measurements using insertion of stenosis phantoms in porcine coronary arteries. Cath Cardiovasc Diagn 1992;27:16-27.
18. Safian RD, Gelbfish JS, Erny RE, Schnitt SJ, Schmidt DA, Baim DS. Coronary atherectomy: clinical, angiographic and histological findings and observations regarding potential mechanisms. Circulation 1990;82:69-79.
19. Kimball BP, Bui S, Carere RG, Cohen EA, Adelman AG. Acute outcome of directional coronary atherectomy vs standard balloon angioplasty in de novo left anterior descending stenoses. Chest 1992;102:1676-82.
20. Whitlow PL, Franco I. Indications for directional coronary atherectomy: 1993. Am J Cardiol 1993;72 Suppl E:21E-9E.
21. Cowley MJ, DiSciascio G. Experience with directional coronary atherectomy since pre-market approval. Am J Cardiol 1993;72 Suppl E:12E-20E.
22. Safian RD, Schreiber TL, Baim DS. Specific indications for directional coronary atherectomy: origin left anterior descending coronary artery and bifurcation lesions. Am J Cardiol 1993;72 Suppl E:35E-41E.
23. Hinohara T, Rowe MH, Robertson GC, et al. Effect of lesion characteristics on outcome of directional coronary atherectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;17:1112-20.
24. Popma JJ, De Cesare NB, Ellis SG, et al. Clinical, angiographic and procedural correlates of quantitatiave coronary dimensions after directional coronary atherectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;18:1183-9.
25. Kuntz RE, Safian RD. Corrozza JP, Fishman RF, Mansour M, Baim DS. The importance of acute luminal diameter in determining restenosis after coronary atherectomy or stenting. Circulation 1992;86:1827-35.