Mathematical modeling of fetal foot growth: Use of the Rossavik growth model

American Journal of Perinatology

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 155-158

  Hata, Toshiyuki ^a   Senoh, Daisaku ^a   Hata, Kohkichi ^a   Kitao, Manabu ^a  

^a SHIMANE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

fetal foot; Mathematical modeling; Rossavik growth model; ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FETUS; FETUS GROWTH; FOOT; GESTATIONAL AGE; GROWTH RATE; HUMAN; JAPAN; LIMB DEVELOPMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0029875654     PISSN: 07351631     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-994315     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Hern WN, Correlation of fetal age and measurements between 10 and 26 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol 1984;63: 26-32
2. Mercer BM, Sklar S, Shariatmadar A, et al. Fetal foot length as a predictor of gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;156:350-5
3. Platt LD, Medearis AL, DeVore GR, et al. Fetal foot length: relationship to menstrual age and fetal measurements in the second trimester. Obstet Gynecol 1988;71:526-31
4. Rossavik IK, Deter RL. Mathematical modeling of fetal growth: I. Basic principles. J Clin Ultrasound 1984;12:529-33
5. Rossavik IK, Deter RL. Mathematical modeling of fetal growth: II. Head cube (A), abdominal cube (B) and their ratio (A/B). J Clin Ultrasound 1984;12:535-45
6. Hata T, Deter RL, Aoki S, et al. Mathematical modeling of fetal splenic growth: use of the Rossavik model. J Clin Ultrasound 1992;20:321-7
7. Hata T, Deter RL, Nagata H, et al. Mathematical modeling of fetal organ growth using the Rossavik growth model: II. Adrenal gland. Am J Perinatol 1993;10:95-8
8. Manabe A, Hata T, Senoh D, et al. Mathematical modeling of fetal organ growth using Rossavik growth model. III. Cardiac ventricle. Am J Perinatol 1994;11:320-5
9. Hata T, Manabe A, Tamaru N, et al. Mathematical modeling of fetal organ growth using the Rossavik growth model: IV. Lung. Am J Perinatol 1995,12:138-42
10. Iwamoto K. Estimation of gestational age with ultrasonic measurement of the fetus in each trimester. Acta Obst Gynaec Jpn 1983;35:2330-8
11. Tsuzaki T, Iwamoto K, Maeda K. Significance in ultrasonographic measurement of fetal limb bones Acta Obst Gynaec Jpn 1982;34:315-20
12. Sato A, Akama M, Yamanobe H, et al. Intrauterine growth of live-born Japanese infants between 28 and 42 weeks of gestation. Acta Obst Gynaec Jpn 1982;34:1535-8
13. Campbell J, Henderson A, Campbell S. The fetal femur/foot length ratio: a new parameter to assess dysplastic limb reduction. Obstet Gynecol 1988;72:181-4
14. Deter RL, Harrist RB, Hadlock FP, Carpenter RJ. Fetal head and abdominal circumferences: II. A critical re-evaluation of the relationship to menstrual age. J Clin Ultrasound 1982;10:365-72
15. Moor KL. The Developing Human, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1977, pp 70-92
16. Rohatgi VK. An Introduction to Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics. New York: John Witey & Sons, 1976, pp 506-12
17. Dunn OJ, Clark VA. Applied Statistics: Analysis of Variance and Regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1974, pp 252-305
18. Bertagnoli L, Lalatta F, Gallicchio R, et al. Quantitative characterization of the growth of the kidney. J Clin Ultrasound 1983;11:349-56
19. Snedector WG, Cochran WG. Statistical Methods, 6th ed. Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1967, pp 135-197
20. Deter RL, Rossavik IK, Harrist RB, Hadlock FP. Mathematical modeling of fetal growth, development of individual growth curve standards. Obstet Gynecol 1986;68:156-61
21. Deter RL, Rossavik IK, Hill RM, et al. Longitudinal studies of femur growth in normal fetuses. J Clin Ultrasound 1987; 15:299-305