-
4
-
-
0026361992
-
-
Singh, H.; Jindal, D. P.; Yadav, M. R.; Kumar, M. Prog. Med. Chem. 1991, 28, 233.
-
(1991)
Prog. Med. Chem.
, vol.28
, pp. 233
-
-
Singh, H.1
Jindal, D.P.2
Yadav, M.R.3
Kumar, M.4
-
5
-
-
0028075873
-
-
Bakshi, R. K.; Patel, G. F.; Rasmusson, G. H.; Baginsky, W. F.; Cimis, G.; Ellsworth, K.; Chang, B.; Bull, H.; Tolman, R. L.; Harris, G. S. J. Med Chem. 1994, 37, 3871.
-
(1994)
J. Med Chem.
, vol.37
, pp. 3871
-
-
Bakshi, R.K.1
Patel, G.F.2
Rasmusson, G.H.3
Baginsky, W.F.4
Cimis, G.5
Ellsworth, K.6
Chang, B.7
Bull, H.8
Tolman, R.L.9
Harris, G.S.10
-
9
-
-
85030191580
-
-
note
-
All new compounds exhibited spectroscopic (IR, NMR and MS) and analytical (combustion analysis or high resolution mass spectrum) data in accord with the assigned structure.
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
85030190957
-
-
note
-
13C-NMR, δ 169.5, 150.9, 123.8; m/z 430 (42%), 413 (28%), 398 (38%), 395 (100), 383 (21%).
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
85030191555
-
-
note
-
7α-H 4.65 ppm). These values are most consistent with axial-equatorial and diaxial coupling, respectively. This assignment is corroborated by the down-field shift of C-19 protons in the 7β-OH epimer (δ 1.36 versus 1.30 in the 7α-OH epimer).
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
85030194347
-
-
note
-
13C-NMR, δ 169.8, 154.4, 127.1; m/z 446 (21%), 428 (100), 414 (14%), 411 (21%).
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
85030195395
-
-
note
-
13C-NMR, δ 169.5, 149.9, 135.6; m/z 460 (28%), 443 (30%), 414 (100%).
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
85030192378
-
-
note
-
13C-NMR, δ 205.4, 173.0, 85.1; m/z 417 (1%), 399 (29%), 384 (12%), 262 (64%), 127 (100).
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
85030190899
-
-
note
-
13C-NMR, δ 208.2, 171.1, 91.5; m/z 431 (<1%), 262 (5%), 141 (100%).
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
0001675375
-
-
Back, T. G.; Chau, J. H.-L.; Dyck, B. P.; Gladstone, P. L. Can. J. Chem. 1991, 69, 1482.
-
(1991)
Can. J. Chem.
, vol.69
, pp. 1482
-
-
Back, T.G.1
Chau, J.H.-L.2
Dyck, B.P.3
Gladstone, P.L.4
-
18
-
-
85030187673
-
-
note
-
13C-NMR, δ 171.9, 152.0, 123.2; m/z 430 (91%), 413 (100%), 398 (15%), 384 (46%).
-
-
-
-
19
-
-
85030190665
-
-
note
-
13C-NMR, δ 198.3, 169.5, 168.5, 97.9; m/z 461 (11%), 416 (29%), 399 (100%), 372 (99%).
-
-
-
-
20
-
-
85030197311
-
-
note
-
13C-NMR, δ 170.6, 157.6, 139.1, 124.2, 118.7; m/z 473 (100%), 458 (5%), 443 (7%), 427 (6%).
-
-
-
-
21
-
-
85030192393
-
-
note
-
13C-NMR, δ 169.6, 166.8, 149.8, 125.9, 113.8; m/z 577 (1%), 545 (1.5%), 503 (23%), 500 (28%), 487 (100%), 458 (36%).
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
85030190016
-
-
Molecular modeling was performed with HyperChem ™ Release 3 from Hypercube, Inc. Minimizations employed the MM+ force field and the Polak-Ribiere (conjugate gradient) algorithm.
-
Molecular modeling was performed with HyperChem ™ Release 3 from Hypercube, Inc. Minimizations employed the MM+ force field and the Polak-Ribiere (conjugate gradient) algorithm.
-
-
-
|